Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging in Clinical Heart Failure

Author(s):  
Edgar Argulian ◽  
Jagat Narula
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Callan Gavaghan

: Pacemaker induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is commonly defined as a reduction in left ventricular (LV) function in the setting of right ventricular (RV) pacing. This condition may be associated with the onset of clinical heart failure in those affected. Recent studies have focused on potential methods of identifying patients at risk of this condition, in addition to hypothesizing the most efficacious ways to manage these patients. Newer pacing options, such as His bundle pacing, may avoid the onset of PICM entirely.


2017 ◽  
pp. 57-60
Author(s):  
Estu Rukdityo ◽  
Amiliana M Soesanto

Pemeriksaan fungsi diastolik ventrikel kiri merupakan bagian tidak terpisahkan pada setiap pemeriksaan ekokardiografi rutin. Gangguan fungsi diastolik yang dinilai melalui pemeriksaan ekokardiografi merupakan salah satu kriteria diagnosis gagal jantung dengan fraksi ejeksi normal (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, HFpEF).1 ASE (American Society of Echocardiography) dan EACVI [European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging]) telah mengeluarkan panduan pemeriksaan ekokardiografi fungsi diastolik ventrikel kiri pada tahun 2009.2 Sayangnya panduan tersebut terlalu banyak menggunakan parameter fungsi diastolik sehingga agak sulit diaplikasikan pada pemeriksaan rutin ekokardiografi sehari-hari. Panduan tersebut juga tidak memuat konsensus yang jelas untuk menentukan derajat disfungsi diastolik bila terdapat ketidaksesuaian hasil antara berbagai parameter yang ada.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobusada FUNABASHI ◽  
Yoshio Kobayashi

Introduction: 4D cardiac CT can reveal characteristics of arrhythmogenic right ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy (ARVC) such as fat and fibrotic invasion into the RV and LV myocardium (RVM, LVM), an enlarged RV, reduced RV motion and bulging. Hypothesis: We could differentiate ARVC patients with fat and fibrotic invasion into the LVM from those without, using ECG, clinical, and other imaging characteristics. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 17 patients (11 males, 57±17 years) with suspected ARVC who underwent 4D cardiac CT. Results: 9 patients met the 2010 ARVC task force criteria. 4 had fat and fibrotic invasion into the LVM (group 1) but 5 did not (group 2). The remaining 8 did not fulfill the ARVC criteria (group 3). The proportion of males and age did not differ between groups. In groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, 3 (75%), 4 (80%), and 1 (13%) patients had epsilon waves in V1-3 (group 1>3, P=0.033, group 2>3, P=0.005). 2 (50%), one (20%) and 4 (50%) had complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB) (all P=NS). Three (75%), 3 (60%), and 1 (13%) had inverted T waves in V1-3 or beyond (group 1>3, P=0.033). One (50%), 3 (75%), and 2 (50%) had terminal activation duration of QRS ≥55 ms measured from the nadir of the S wave to the end of the QRS, including R’, in V1, V2, or V3, in the absence of CRBBB (all P=NS). One (25%), 4 (80%) and 1 (13%) had sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT; group 2>3, P=0.005). Two (50%), 1 (20%), and 3 (38%) had non-SVT (all P=NS). 4 (100%), 2 (40%), and 2 (25%) had clinical heart failure (group 1>2, P=0.019, group 1>3, P<0.001). Finally, 4 (100% and 80%) and 6 (75%) had RV enlargement on TTE (all P=NS). On 4D CT, 4 (100%), 5 (100%), and 5 (63%) of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, showed RV enlargement (all P=NS); 4 (100%), 2 (40%), and 1 (13%) showed reduced RV motion (group 1>2, P=0.019, group 1>3, P<0.001); 75, 100, and 0%, had RV fat invasion (group 1>3, P=0.002, group 2>3, P<0.001); and 25, 0, and 0% showed bulging (all P=NS). Conclusions: Most patients had RV enlargement on TTE and/or 4D CT. Presence of epsilon waves, reduced RV motion, and RV fat invasion on 4D CT may differentiate groups 1 and 2 from group 3, inverted T waves in V1-3 leads or beyond may differentiate group 1 from group 3, SVT may differentiate group 2 from group 3 but only clinical heart failure may differentiate groups 1 and 2.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1331-1340
Author(s):  
Bernard Cosyns ◽  
Kristina H Haugaa ◽  
Bernrhard Gerber ◽  
Alessia Gimelli ◽  
Leyla Elif Sade ◽  
...  

Abstract The European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging was launched in 2012 and has during these years become one of the leading multimodality cardiovascular imaging journal. The journal is now established as one of the top cardiovascular journals and is the most important cardiovascular imaging journal in Europe. The most important studies published in our Journal from 2019 will be highlighted in two reports. Part II will focus on valvular heart disease, heart failure, cardiomyopathies, and congenital heart disease. While Part I of the review has focused on studies about myocardial function and risk prediction, myocardial ischaemia, and emerging techniques in cardiovascular imaging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document