Distanced self-talk changes how people conceptualize the self

2020 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 103969
Author(s):  
Izzy Gainsburg ◽  
Ethan Kross
Keyword(s):  
The Self ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert J. M Hermans

For the development of a democratic self, dialogical relationships between different people and between different positions in the self are paramount. After a review of studies on self-talk, the main part of this chapter is devoted to a comparison of the works of two classic thinkers on dialogue, Mikhail Bakhtin and David Bohm. A third theoretical perspective is depicted in which central elements of the two theorists are combined. This perspective centers around the concept of “generative dialogue” that, as a learning process, has the potential of innovation in the form of new and common meanings without total unification of the different positions. Elaborating on central features of generative dialogue, a distinction is made between consonant and dissonant dialogue, the latter of which is inevitable in a time of globalization and localization in which people are increasingly interdependent and, at the same time, faced with their apparent differences.


2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-176
Author(s):  
안병환
Keyword(s):  
The Self ◽  

Psychology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 119-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Khodayarifard ◽  
Thomas M. Brinthaupt ◽  
Saeed Akbari Zardkhaneh ◽  
Golrokh Ebadi Fard Azar

2001 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 835-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney M. Gabel ◽  
Roger D. Colcord ◽  
Linda Petrosino
Keyword(s):  
The Self ◽  

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 335-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula S. Nurius ◽  
Diane Majerus
Keyword(s):  
The Self ◽  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy L. Van Raalte ◽  
Allen E. Cornelius ◽  
Elizabeth M. Mullin ◽  
Britton W. Brewer ◽  
Erika D. Van Dyke ◽  
...  

A series of studies was conducted by Senay et al. in 2010 to replicate and extend research indicating that self-posed questions have performance benefits. Studies 1–3 compared the effects of the self-posed interrogative question (“Will I?”) to declarative (“I will”) and control self-talk, and found no significant group differences in motivation, perceived exertion, or performance. In Studies 4–5, interrogative, declarative, and control self-talk primes were compared, and no outcome differences were found. In Study 6, the effects of self-talk on motivation, perceived exertion, and physical performance were assessed. The self-talk groups performed better and were more motivated than the control group, but declarative and interrogative groups did not differ from each other. Finally, meta-analyses of the six studies indicated no significant differences among conditions. These results highlight the value of replication and suggest that factors other than grammatical form of self-posed questions may drive the demonstrated relationships between self-talk and performance.


2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Brinthaupt ◽  
Michael B. Hein ◽  
Tracey E. Kramer

2001 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 309-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannis Theodorakis ◽  
Stiliani Chroni ◽  
Kostas Laparidis ◽  
Vagelis Bebetsos ◽  
Irini Douma

This study examined the effectiveness of two different types of self-talk on the performance of a basketball-shooting task. 60 physical education and sports sciences students were organized into one control and two treatment groups which used self-talk. During the experiment, the control group performed with the general instructions, whereas the self-talk groups used the cue-words “relax” and “fast,” respectively. Analysis showed that only the participants of the self-talk group who used the word “relax” improved their performance significantly as compared to the other two groups. It appears that self-talk can positively affect performance if its content is appropriate for the task performed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document