Geriatric and tumour factors influencing cancer treatment decision making: analysis of data from 360 older cancer patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. S81
Author(s):  
E. Castel-Kremer ◽  
T. Benet ◽  
C. Lombard-Bohas ◽  
P. Mere ◽  
G. Albrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Older Cancer Patients

Treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: A qualitative study

2020 ◽  
pp. 096973302094575
Author(s):  
Ni Gong ◽  
Qianqian Du ◽  
Hongyu Lou ◽  
Yiheng Zhang ◽  
Hengying Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Chinese Society ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
The Family ◽  
Older Cancer Patients

Background: Independent decision-making is one of the basic rights of patients. However, in clinical practice, most older cancer patients’ treatment decisions are made by family members. Objective: This study attempted to analyze the treatment decision-making process and formation mechanism for older cancer patients within the special cultural context of Chinese medical practice. Method: A qualitative study was conducted. With the sample saturation principle, data collected by in-depth interviews with 17 family members and 12 patients were subjected to thematic analysis. Ethical considerations: The study was approved by the ethics committees of Sun Yat-sen University. All participants provided verbal informed consent after being told their rights of confidentiality, anonymity, and voluntary participation. They had the right to refuse to answer questions and could withdraw at any time. Results: Three themes emerged: (1) complex process; (2) transformation of family decision-making power; and (3) individual compromise. Family members inevitably had different opinions during the long process of treatment decision-making for older cancer patients. The direction of this process could be regarded as an extension of the family power relationship. The patient usually compromised the decision to survive, which was made by family members. Conclusion: This study describes the treatment decision-making process of older cancer patients in the context of Chinese culture. The reasons underlying this process are related to the views on life and death and family values. An individual is a part of the family, which is often seen as the minimal interpersonal unit in Chinese society. It is significant that while emphasizing patient autonomy in the decision-making process, health professionals should also pay attention to the important roles of culture and family.

Primary care provider-reported participation in breast cancer treatment decision making.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
Lauren P. Wallner ◽  
Yun Li ◽  
Chandler McLeod ◽  
Archana Radhakrishnan ◽  
Sarah T. Hawley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Breast Cancer Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Treatment Decision Making

78 Background: Surgical treatment decisions for early-stage breast cancer patients are complex and often involve discussions with multiple oncology providers. However, with the increasing adoption of team-based cancer care models, it remains unknown to what extent primary care providers (PCPs) are participating in breast cancer treatment decisions and whether they feel they have enough knowledge to participate in these decisions effectively. Methods: A stratified random sample of PCPs identified by newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer patients who participated in iCanCare Study (Georgia and Los Angeles SEER registries) were surveyed about their experiences caring for cancer patients (N = 519, 58% current response rate). PCPs were asked how frequently they discussed which surgery a patient should have, how comfortable they were with these discussions, whether they had the necessary knowledge to participate in treatment decision making and their confidence in their ability to help with treatment decision making (5-item likert-type scales). The individual items were then categorized as somewhat/often/always vs. never/rarely for analyses. Results: In this preliminary sample, 62% of PCPs were not comfortable having a discussion about surgery options with a patient newly diagnosed with breast cancer, 41% did not feel that they had the necessary knowledge to participate in treatment decision-making, and 34% were not confident in the ability to help with treatment decision-making. One third (32%) of PCPs reported discussing surgical treatment options with their newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, but 22% of these PCPs also reported that they were not comfortable having these discussions and 16% reported they did not have necessary knowledge to participate in decision-making. Conclusions: A minority of PCPs participate in breast cancer treatment decision-making and there are notable gaps in their self-reported knowledge about decision-making and confidence in their ability to help with these decisions. Efforts to increase PCP knowledge about the specifics of cancer treatments may be warranted, but further research is needed to assess the impact of PCP participation on treatment decision-making outcomes.

scholarly journals Multidimensional integrative medicine applied to outpatient cancer treatment in southern Brazil: Preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl) ◽  
pp. 5-5
Author(s):  
James Freitas Fleck ◽  
Ricardo Preger ◽  
Luis Fernando Venegas ◽  
Henrique de Araujo Vianna Trasel
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Integrative Medicine ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Care Plans

5 Background: Cost-effective analysis as part of cancer treatment decision-making. Methods: We reviewed deaths of 52 metastatic cancer patients treated with multidimensional integrative medicine (MIM) approach. Patients received standard oncologic treatment plus a MIM predefined program of emotional, cognitive and social support. The method included empathy improvement, changes on physician attitude and office environment, modulation of staff behavior supporting patient’s needs and rights, promotion of belongingness, increasing on patient’s protagonism using multimedia interactive narrative and shared decision-making. Patients were categorised according to the tumor site, pathologic, molecular and IHC characteristics, clinical stage and treatment. Observed survival was defined as the time elapsed between the detection of first metastasis and death. The observed survival for each patient was compared with the median expected survival previously reported on prospective randomised trials which had accrued patients with similar prognostic factors based on a best fit model. Treatment monthly cost for each patient was converted in American dollars (USD) on a daily exchange basis. Cost of the treatment periods were compared with those analysed in four large USA commercial managed care plans. Results: Treatment of metastatic cancer patients using MIM showed a 44% increase in median survival and a 48% decrease in cost. The estimated ICER/QALY was of 32304 USD, which represented 2.0 of Brazilian PPP. Conclusions: Despite methodological limitations, this is the first study to indicate a cost-effective survival increase in metastatic cancer patients using a MIM-behavioral modulation model. [Table: see text]

Factors influencing cancer treatment decision-making by indigenous peoples: a systematic review

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rona Tranberg ◽  
Susan Alexander ◽  
Deborah Hatcher ◽  
Sandra Mackey ◽  
Shaouli Shahid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Factors Influencing

Information behaviour and decision-making in patients during their cancer journey

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 494-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-Chuan Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Information Source ◽  
Alternative Therapy ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Information Behaviour ◽  
Treatment Decision Making

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effect of cancer patients’ information behaviour on their decision-making at the diagnosis and treatment stages of their cancer journey. Patients’ information sources and their decision-making approaches were analyzed. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 participants. Findings The cancer patients sought information from various sources in choosing a hospital, physician, treatment method, diet and alternative therapy. Physicians were the primary information source. The patients’ approaches to treatment decision-making were diverse. An informed approach was adopted by nine patients, a paternalistic approach by four and a shared decision-making approach by only two. Practical implications In practice, the findings may assist hospitals and medical professionals in fostering pertinent interactions with patients. Originality/value The findings can enhance researcher understanding regarding the effect of cancer patients’ information behaviour on their decision-making.

Breast cancer patients' personality style, age, and treatment decision making

1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie D. Johnson ◽  
Cleora S. Roberts ◽  
Charles E. Cox ◽  
Douglas S. Reintgen ◽  
Judi S. Levine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Personality Style ◽  
Treatment Decision Making
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document