A Resource-based View of Strategic Alliances and Firm Value in the Electronic Marketplace

2004 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Namgyoo K. Park ◽  
John M. Mezias ◽  
Jaeyong Song
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 311-311
Author(s):  
Woo Li Ko ◽  
◽  
Sang Yong Kim ◽  
Jong-Ho Lee

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessy Malinda ◽  
Dyna Rachmawati

<p><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong><strong><em>: </em></strong><em>Value relevance is the ability of a value in explaining information about company's valuation. Company valuation has a connection with the investors and their investment decisions. Based on the Resource Based View (RBV) theory, well-managed intellectual capital can generate value added and future competitive advantage for the company. This value added and competitive ability can affect investor's decision to make an investment in the company. This investment decision means the demand for company shares are increasing and along with this increase, the company’s market share price also increases. The increase in company's stock price will increase the value of the company.</em><strong><em></em></strong><em> This quantitative research aims to examine and analyze the value relevance of intellectual capital. Intellectual capital in this study measured using the Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC<sup>TM</sup>) method, Intellectual Capital Index (ICI), and through Yahoo Finance's Internet Message Boards (IMBs). The independent variable in this study is intellectual capital, the dependent variable used is firm value, and the control variable is size of the company used in this study. This research samples was selected using purposive sampling method on the companies registered in Kompas100 for the period of July 2019. Data analysis in this study used multiple linear regression.The results of this study conclude that intellectual capital measured using VAIC<sup>TM</sup> and through Yahoo Finance IMBs has no value relevance. Whereas intellectual capital which is measured using ICI has value relevance. These results indicate that ICI is the most appropriate proxy for measuring intellectual capital.</em><em></em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em> </em><em>v</em><em>alue relevance, intellectual capital</em><em>, firm value, company size</em></p><p><strong>ABSTRAK</strong>: Relevansi nilai merupakan kemampuan suatu nilai dalam menjelaskan informasi mengenai penilaian suatu perusahaan. Penilaian suatu perusahaan memiliki kaitan dengan investor dan keputusan investasinya. Berdasarkan teori Resource Based View (RBV), modal intelektual yang dikelola dengan baik dapat menghasilkan nilai tambah dan keuntungan kompetitif di masa depan bagi perusahaan. Nilai tambah dan kemamppuan kompetitif ini dapat mempengaruhi pengambilan keputusan investor untuk memberikan investasi pada perusahaan. Adanya keputusan investasi pada perusahaan berarti permintaan atas saham perusahaan meningkat dan seiring dengan peningkatan ini, harga pasar saham perusahaan ikut meningkat. Peningkatan pada harga saham perusahaan akan memberikan kenaikan pada nilai perusahaan. Penelitian kuantitatif ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menganalisis relevansi nilai modal intelektual. Modal intelektual dalam penelitian ini diukur dengan menggunakan metode <em>Value Added Intellectual Coefficient</em> (VAIC<sup>TM</sup>), <em>Intellectual Capital Index</em> (ICI), dan melalui <em>Internet Message Boards</em> (IMBs) Yahoo Finance. Variabel independen dalam penelitian ini adalah modal intelektual, variabel dependen yang digunakan adalah nilai perusahaan, dan variabel kontrol yaitu ukuran perusahaan digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Sampel penelitian dipilih menggunakan metode purposive sampling pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Kompas100 periode Juli 2019. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa modal intelektual yang diukur menggunakan VAIC<sup>TM</sup> dan melalui IMBs Yahoo Finance tidak memiliki relevansi nilai. Sedangkan modal intelektual yang diukur menggunakan ICI memiliki relevansi nilai. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa ICI merupakan proksi yang paling tepat untuk digunakan dalam mengukur modal intelektual.</p><p><strong>Kata Kunci:</strong> relevansi nilai, modal intelektual, nilai perusahaan, ukuran perusahaan</p>


2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Das ◽  
Bing-Sheng Teng

The resource-based view of the firm has not been systematically applied to strategic alliances. By examining the role of firm resources in strategic alliances, we attempt, in this paper, to put forward a general resource-based theory of strategic alliances, synthesizing the various findings in the literature on alliances from a resource-based view. The proposed theory covers four major aspects of strategic alliances: rationale, formation, structural preferences, and performance. The resource-based view suggests that the rationale for alliances is the value-creation potential of firm resources that are pooled together. We note that certain resource characteristics, such as imperfect mobility, imitability, and substitutability, promise accentuated value-creation, and thus facilitate alliance formation. We discuss how the resource profiles of partner firms would determine their structural preferences in terms of four major categories of alliances: equity joint ventures, minority equity alliances, bilateral contract-based alliances, and unilateral contract-based alliances. As part of the theory, we propose a typology of inter-partner resource alignment based on the two dimensions of resource similarity and resource utilization, yielding four types of alignment: supplementary, surplus, complementary, and wasteful. We also discuss how partner resource alignment directly affects collective strengths and inter-firm conflicts in alliances, which in turn contribute to alliance performance. Finally, we develop a number of propositions to facilitate empirical testing of the theoretical framework, suggest ways to carry out this testing, indicate future research directions, and list some of the more significant managerial implications of the framework.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-Min Choe

Many prior studies have only investigated one or two kinds of business to business (B2B) electronic commerce (EC), and did not develop or suggest a framework for the classification of forms of B2B EC. This study focused on B2B EC with suppliers. Based on the degrees of information sharing between buyers and sellers as well as the levels of suppliers' power, we suggested a framework that is useful for classifying types of B2B EC strategies. According to this framework, four kinds of B2B EC strategies were proposed: electronic marketplace, electronic procurement, electronic partnerships and electronic distribution. With a cluster analysis, we empirically confirmed these four kinds of B2B EC strategies, and demonstrated the usefulness of a framework for the classification of types of B2B EC. The framework constructed in this study can be utilized in various ways. Specifically, when a firm wants to introduce B2B EC with suppliers, this framework can help a firm to decide and select an appropriate kind of B2B EC. This framework can also be applied to evaluate whether the proper form of B2B EC has been adopted or not.Keywords: Electronic Commerce; Information Sharing; Suppliers’ Power; Resource-Based View;Transaction Cost Theory.


2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-121
Author(s):  
George Bedinelli Rossi ◽  
Angela Cristiane Santos Póvoa ◽  
Mauro Neves Garcia ◽  
Silvio Augusto Minciotti

This article investigates the influence of scarcity of resources in entrepreneurial arrangements, known as strategic alliances. Revision of the literature suggests three theories: Resources Dependence, Resource Based View and Organizational Learning. The economic sector investigated was industrial automobile automation and the participant companies were chosen by judgment and because they had strategic alliances. Data collection took place in 2005 through in-depth interviews, which were submitted to content analysis. The results, in the light of the Resources Dependence Theory, reveal that companies form alliances for the acquisition of production technology because of the high investments demanded and owing to the seasonality of orders from automobile assembly plants.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Cristina Bettinelli ◽  
Mara Bergamaschi ◽  
Rasmi Kokash ◽  
Silvia Biffignandi

<p>We investigate whether and how process innovation of small enterprises is influenced by allying with another firm. Drawing on resource-based view of the firm and integrating findings from studies on the liabilities of age and newness, we argue: 1) for a direct association between strategic alliances and process innovation, and 2) in favor of a moderating role of firm age on this relationship. The results from a representative sample of 159 Italian small firms shed new light on the role of strategic alliances in explaining process innovation, and support this proposal. We find a significant and positive relationship between strategic alliances and process innovation, and a moderating effect of firm age on this relationship. This suggests that a younger firm benefits more than an older one from the increase in process innovation activities occurring as a result of alliances with other firms. The age of the firm appears to dictate the nature of relationship between strategic alliances and process innovation. Significant and novel theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.</p>


2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 803-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike W. Peng

The resource-based view (RBV) of the firm has become an influential theoretical perspective in recent international business (IB) research. Tracking the evolution of the RBV literature in IB, this article has three objectives. First, it documents the extent to which the RBV has diffused to IB research. Second, it explains the rationale behind such diffusion. Finally, it provides a state-of-the-art review of the substantive work through a proposed organizing framework, focusing on multinational management, strategic alliances, market entries, international entrepreneurship, and emerging markets strategies. Overall, a broad, expanding, and cumulative knowledge base is emerging to connect IB and strategy research through the RBV. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of such a development in the intellectual marketplace, with an emphasis on future research directions.


2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Duane Ireland ◽  
Michael A. Hitt ◽  
Deepa Vaidyanath

Strategic alliances are an important source of resources, learning, and thereby competitive advantage. Few firms have all of the resources needed to compete effectively in the current dynamic landscape. Thus, firms seek access to the necessary resources through alliances. We examine the management of strategic alliances using the theoretical frames of transactions cost, social network theory and the resource-based view. Alliances must be effectively managed for their benefits to be realized. Effective alliance management begins with selecting the right partner. Furthermore, alliances must be managed to build social capital and knowledge. To maximize cooperation among the partners, a trust-based relationship must be developed. Therefore, we conclude that managing alliances is crucial for firms to gain competitive advantage and create value with strategic alliances.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 30-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunchul Lee ◽  
Euije Cho ◽  
Chongcheul Cheong ◽  
Jinsu Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document