Comparison predictive factor in patients with cryptogenic stroke versus paradoxical embolism unaccompanied deep vein thrombosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 381 ◽  
pp. 409
Author(s):  
R. Doijiri ◽  
K. Takahashi ◽  
D. Obara ◽  
H. Osawa ◽  
H. Takahashi ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 16-33
Author(s):  
A. A. Kulesh ◽  
D. A. Demin ◽  
A. V. Belopasova ◽  
S. A. Mekhryakov ◽  
O. I. Vinogradov ◽  
...  

Cryptogenic stroke (CS) is defined as a subtype of stroke associated with a heterogeneous group of pathogenetic mechanisms that remained undetermined in the course of advanced diagnostic research. One third or fourth of the ischemic strokes is cryptogenic. Paradoxical embolism is considered the important cause of cryptogenic stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in young patients. It may occur via the following: patent foramen ovale (PFO), atrial septal defect (ASD), and pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM). When interviewing patients with suspected paradoxical embolism to obtain their health history, a practitioner should consider factors associated with Valsalva maneuvers, deep vein thrombosis/PE or predisposing conditions or situations, as well as symptoms of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (telangiectasia of the skin and mucous membranes, hemorrhagic syndrome) and pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) (shortness of breath, hemoptysis). If paradoxical embolism is suspected, it is necessary to conduct a stepwise diagnostic search, including transcranial Doppler ultrasound with bubble test, contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography, and CT angiopulmonography. Diagnosis of relevant clinical conditions involves a search of atrial tachyarrhythmias, deep vein thrombosis, and thrombophilia. As the pathogenetic role of ASD and PAVMs in the development of embolic cryptogenic stroke is beyond doubt, the clinical significance of PFO should be determined taking into account several factors, including the presence of deep vein thrombosis/PE, the severity of the right-left shunt, the presence of ASD, the RoPE score, and detection of thrombophilia. The secondary prevention techniques of ischemic stroke or TIA with underlying PFO should be selected on a case-by-case basis, depending on the clinical significance of the anomaly, comorbid pathology, life expectancy of the patient: endovascular occlusion, anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. The secondary prevention with underlying ASD and LAVM includes surgical techniques such as endovascular occlusion or open surgery followed by monitoring of their effectiveness.


2008 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1133-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrus Edibam ◽  
David J. Morgan ◽  
Sudhakar V. Rao ◽  
Arieh Keren ◽  
Jenny Deague

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Samuel ◽  
Thuy Nguyen ◽  
Sujan T Reddy ◽  
Kaushik N Parsha ◽  
Sean I Savitz

Introduction: Cryptogenic stroke may result from paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale (PFO). However, the association between deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and cryptogenic stroke has not been proven. The objective of our study is to compare the incidence of DVT in young and old patients who presented with acute ischemic stroke and were found to have a PFO. Method: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study from January 2014-December 2018. Patients over the age of 18 with ischemic stroke and PFO, who underwent magnetic resonance venography (MRV) of the pelvis and venous doppler ultrasonography (VDU) for assessment of DVT were included. Primary endpoint was the incidence of DVT in patients that were age ≤ 60 (young group) compared to those age > 60 (old group). We further analyzed the incidence of DVT in cryptogenic stroke vs determined origin; and based on the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (ROPE) score. Results: We included 327 patients: 200 were young (Y) and 127 were old (O). Incidence of DVT was similar for patients in Y versus those in O group (7% vs 8%). A significantly higher ROPE score ≥ 6 was seen in the Y group (71% vs 9%; p<0.001). However, there was no difference in the incidence of DVT in patients with high (9%) or low ROPE scores (8%); OR 0.75, 95% CI (0.32-1.76) p=0.517. Among cryptogenic stroke with high ROPE score and young, incidence of DVT was (7% vs 9%) in determined origin; OR 0.74, 95% CI (0.28-1.96) p=0.557. MRV pelvis detected a clot in 5% of all patients. In a multivariable regression analysis; age, gender, and presence of PFO was not associated with the incidence of DVT. Length of stay and mRS at day 7 were the same between Y and O groups. Conclusions: Detection of DVT was not associated with PFO, high ROPE scores or cryptogenic strokes. Our data indicate an over-reliance of testing for DVT, particularly MRV pelvis with contrast, in patients with PFO. Clinical studies are needed to identify other factors predictive of DVT in patients with ischemic stroke and PFO.


2020 ◽  
pp. 161-168
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Larchikova ◽  
A. D. Ehrlikh ◽  
I. N. Smetanina ◽  
N. Yu. Zheltov

Paradoxical thromboembolism due to the presence of an patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a rather rare phenomenon, especially when an embolism results in acute myocardial infarction (MI). The presented clinical case of the paradoxical embolism is interesting for several reasons: firstly, the patient's primary disease was deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary artery thromboembolism (PATE); secondly, apparently, it was due to PATE and the subsequent overload of the right side of the heart that thelatent embolism became apparent; thirdly, the paradoxical embolism was apparently caused by the fragments of alarge thrombus stuck in PFO, fourthly, the current clinical situation was ambiguous with respect to medical decisions, primarily concerning antithrombotic therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document