Review of flue gas acid dew-point and related low temperature corrosion

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 1666-1677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wujun Zuo ◽  
Xiaoyu Zhang ◽  
Yuzhong Li
Keyword(s):  
Flue Gas ◽  
Oil Shale ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
T PIHU ◽  
H ARRO ◽  
A PRIKK ◽  
R ROOTAMM ◽  
A KONIST

Author(s):  
John M. Preston ◽  
W. Reid Watson ◽  
Charles B. Jones

Modern combustion steam-electric plants are designed to recover as much heat as economically feasible from the combustion products. As a part of the continuing effort by utilities to increase plant efficiency, extracting low quality heat from the flue gas stream prior to discharge through the stack to the environment has become economically attractive. “Economic feasibility” is strongly dependent on the cost of the fuel as well as quality of the heat recovered. The economic feasibility of deploying low-temperature economizers to cool flue gas from coal-fired steam-electric plants to a temperature well below the sulfuric acid mist dew point is not commonly practiced but could have a number of salutary effects on unit operations including reduction in fuel use, reduction in water, reduction in fly ash resistivity upstream of cold-side electrostatic precipitators and enhanced mercury oxidation/capture. Using a theoretical 600 MW (nominal) coal fired facility an additional 30.8 MW of electrical output is available with the installation of a Low Temperature Economizer. This represents a 1% improvement in the plant heat rate with an attractive payback period. The components required for this heat recovery sub-system are readily available and the technology has matured to a point where uncertainties are minimized. In addition to improving the operation of the plant, Low Temperature Economizer can reduce emissions of SOx, NOx, Hg, PM and CO2. In a difficult regulatory environment reducing emissions while increasing plant performance is extremely beneficial. Furthermore Low Temperature Economizer lowers the volume of scrubber water required. Cooling the flue gas leaving the air heater below the acid mist dew point is not commonly practiced. The corrosion potential of the condensed sulfuric acid is a major materials selection/maintenance challenge as is the potential for gas-side fouling of the heat exchange surface with fly ash.


Author(s):  
Lin Guo ◽  
Jianjiang Lu ◽  
Yonggang Zhao ◽  
Chengzhi Wang ◽  
Cheng Zhang ◽  
...  

Efficient, environment-friendly, and energy-saving low-temperature denitration (DeNOx) catalysts, applicable in practical flue gas, has a widespread market for use in small-scale boilers. A novel Ce-based low-temperature honeycomb catalyst was tested...


Fuel ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 876-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaokang Wu ◽  
Hailong Li ◽  
Liqing Li ◽  
Chang-Yu Wu ◽  
Junying Zhang ◽  
...  

Fuel ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 73 (7) ◽  
pp. 1144-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel Svoboda ◽  
Weigang Lin ◽  
Jens Hannes ◽  
Rob Korbee ◽  
Cor.M. van den Bleek

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 04005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ding Yang ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
XingLian Ye ◽  
WeiXiang Chen ◽  
Jun Guo ◽  
...  

SO3 is one of the main precursors of atmospheric PM2.5, and its emission has attracted more and more attention in the industry. This paper briefly analyzes the harm of SO3 and the method of controlled condensation to test SO3. The effect of cooperative removal of SO3 by ultra-low emission technology in some coal-fired power plants has been tested by using the method of controlled condensation. The results show that the cooperative removal of SO3 by ultra-low emission technology in coal-fired power plants is effective. The removal rate of SO3 by low-low temperature electrostatic precipitators and electrostatic-fabric integrated precipitators can be exceeded 80%, while the removal rate of SO3 by wet flue gas desulfurization equipment displays lower than the above two facilities, and the wet electrostatic precipitator shows a better removal effect on SO3. With the use of ultra-low emission technology in coal-fired power plants, the SO3 emission concentration of the tail chimney reaches less than 1 mg / Nm3.


2021 ◽  
pp. 897-909
Author(s):  
Yu Yan ◽  
Jiahao Jiang ◽  
Jin Guo ◽  
Yuesheng Li ◽  
Lei Deng ◽  
...  

1953 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 397-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Appleman

Studies carried out in Alaska and Canada have shown that fog is a relatively rare phenomenon at temperatures between 0° and − 30°F, with a minimum frequency between − 20° and −30°. At still lower temperatures, however, the frequency of fog increases rapidly. This effect is noted only in the immediate vicinity of inhabited areas, such as towns and airfields. The reason for the sudden increase in fog frequency at these temperatures, and the rarity or lack of fog at the higher temperatures, has not been heretofore explained. In a recent study on aircraft condensation trails, it was shown that if the temperature is sufficiently low (between − 20 and − 40°F, depending on the relative humidity), the burning of hydrocarbon fuels, such as would occur in towns and at airfields, easily results in supersaturation of the air and a “surface contrail” or ice fog. At higher temperatures, on the other hand, combustion actually reduces the relative humidity of the atmosphere, hindering the formation of fog. In this paper it is shown that low-temperature (ice) fogs form as a result of the combustion process, and curves are presented showing the temperature-dew-point relationship necessary for the formation of such fogs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document