scholarly journals Palliative Care in a Pandemic: A Retrospective Chart Review of the Impact of Early Palliative Care Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Acute Care Setting (QI705)

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 656-657
Author(s):  
Rachel Sabolish ◽  
Jennifer Wilson ◽  
Hollie Caldwell
Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4103-4103
Author(s):  
Geoffrey McInturf ◽  
Kimberly Younger ◽  
Courtney Sanchez ◽  
Charles Walde ◽  
Al-Ola Abdallah ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Despite dramatic treatment advances , multiple myeloma (MM) remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality with 13,000 deaths expected annually in the United States. We characterized patterns of mortality, palliative care involvement, and disease course at the end of life for patients with MM over the last decade. Methods: We assessed all consecutive deceased patients with a diagnosis of MM who received health care at a single health care institution from January 2010 to December 2020. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to data review. Descriptive statistics were employed, and chi square was used to compare categorical variables. Results: A total of 456 patients were identified. Patient characteristics and outcomes are listed in Table 1. In the year prior to death, the prevalence of depression was 45.8% (209 patients), whereas 75.4% of patients were on opiates as an outpatient (344 patients). The mean number of lines of treatment received from diagnosis to death was 3 (range 0-12). Two-hundred eleven (46.3%) patients required red blood cell transfusions in the year prior to death. Palliative care physicians saw 207 (45.4%) patients, of which 97 (46.9%) were seen as outpatient (including those who saw both outpatient and inpatient), and 110 (53.1%) exclusively as an inpatient. The median time from first palliative care consultation to death was 10 days for inpatient palliative care (range 0-389 days), and 107 days for outpatient palliative care (range 2-2028 days). Only 42 (9.2%) patients saw palliative care ≥6 months prior to death. Compared to those patients who did not see palliative care, those that saw palliative care ≥6 months prior to death were more likely to be female (61.9 versus 42.2%, p=0.05), younger (median age at diagnosis 66 versus 71, p=0.03), and have a longer survival (46 months versus 35 months, p=0.006) (Table 1 and Figure 1). Amongst the patients for whom place of death was clearly reported (351, 77%), 117 patients (33.3%) died in the acute care setting, 110 (31.3%) died in a hospice facility, and 124 (35.3%) died at home. Outpatient palliative care consultation did not correlate with a statistically significant difference in deaths in an acute care setting (22/81, 27.2% seeing outpatient palliative care versus 57/174, 32.8% for those who did not, p=0.36), or in chemotherapy (any active treatment other than just steroids) utilization in last month of life (30.9% versus 29.7%, p=0.83). Conclusion: In our analysis of the entire trajectory of the MM patient experience from diagnosis to death, we found a substantial proportion of patients with MM report depression, need opiates for pain control, require blood transfusions and are repeatedly hospitalized in the year prior to their death. A fifth of all deaths occur within a year of diagnosis. With a median of three lines of therapy from diagnosis to death, patients may not live to experience therapies reserved for later lines of treatment. A minority of these patients see a palliative care physician during their treatment journey with the median time from palliative care consultation to death only a month. Palliative care referral at this health system is physician-initiated and not based on standard criteria, which may impact these findings. While there is no clear correlation that palliative care consultation impacted the rate of acute care deaths or decreased utilization of MM treatment in the last month of life, (two common but complicated proxies for quality of end-of-life care), further prospective research on optimal utilization of specialist palliative care is required. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sborov: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkylineDx: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy.


Author(s):  
Heather Carmichael ◽  
Hareklia Brackett ◽  
Maurice C Scott ◽  
Margaret M Dines ◽  
Sarah E Mather ◽  
...  

Abstract Despite significant morbidity and mortality for major burns, palliative care consultation (PCC) is underutilized in this population. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of a protocol using recommended “triggers” for PCC at a single academic burn center. This is a retrospective review of patient deaths over a four-year period. Use of life-sustaining treatments, comfort care (de-escalation of one or more life-sustaining treatments) and do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) orders were determined. Use of PCC was compared during periods before and after a protocol establishing recommended triggers for early (<72 hrs of admission) PCC was instituted in 2019. A total of 33 patient deaths were reviewed. Most patients were male (n=28, 85%) and median age was 62 years [IQR 42-72]. Median revised Baux score was 112 [IQR 81-133]. Many patients had life-sustaining interventions such as intubation, dialysis, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, often prior to admission. Amongst patients who survived >24 hrs, 67% (n=14/21) had PCC. Frequency of PCC increased after protocol development, with 100% vs. 36% of these patients having PCC before death (p=0.004). However, even during the later period, less than half of patients had early PCC despite meeting criteria at admission. In conclusion, initiation of life-sustaining measures in severely injured burn patients occurs prior to or early during hospitalization. Thus, value-based early goals of care discussions are valuable to prevent interventions that do not align with patient values and assist with de-escalation of life-sustaining treatment. In this small sample, we found that while there was increasing use of PCC overall after developing a protocol of recommended triggers for consultation, many patients who met criteria at admission did not receive early PCC. Further research is needed to elucidate reasons why providers may be resistant to PCC.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (7-8) ◽  
pp. e1429-e1441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhonda L Babine ◽  
Kristiina E Hyrkäs ◽  
Sarah Hallen ◽  
Heidi R Wierman ◽  
Deborah A Bachand ◽  
...  

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S73-S73
Author(s):  
R. Soegtrop ◽  
K. Van Aarsen ◽  
M. Columbus ◽  
A. Dong

Introduction: Patients who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with a drug overdose often require long periods of monitoring. After their initial assessment and stabilization, they spend a significant amount of time in a high cost acute care bed in the ED for monitoring until they are medically cleared for psychiatric care or to be discharged. The shift length at this ED is a maximum of 8 hours; meaning any patients staying over 8 hours must be handed over between physicians, increasing the chance of medical errors. The objective of this study is to examine the total ED length of stay (LOS) of this patient group after physician initial assessment (PIA) to determine if there is there justification for the creation of a toxicology observation or short-stay unit for these patients. Methods: A single-centre, blinded retrospective chart review was conducted examining all adult patients presenting to the ED at an urban academic tertiary care centre with a drug overdose in 2018. Variables examined include: Disposition (home, admitted to acute care setting, admitted to non-acute care setting), time from PIA to disposition and total length of stay from PIA to discharge home or admission to hospital. The primary outcome is total length of stay in the ED after PIA.M Results: A total of 1006 patients presenting with an overdose were included. A total of 388 patients were admitted with 44% (172) having an ED LOS greater than 8 hours and 36% (138) staying 8 hours after PIA. The median [IQR] LOS in the ED for all patients was 343 minutes [191-565] while the median [IQR] time to PIA was 37 minutes [15-97]. The majority of these patients (54%) were discharged with no consulting services involved, 23% received a consult to psychiatry, 22% were consulted to internal medicine and 5% of patients were consulted to Critical Care Medicine. Conclusion: This demonstrates patients presenting to the ED with an overdose are seen in the ED by a physician quickly, however many stay in the department over 5 hours from their initial assessment in a monitored setting. While a majority of these patients are able to go home, 44% of admitted patients wait greater than 8 hours in the ED on monitors. The creation of a toxicology observation unit would be helpful for this population to increase patient safety and ease ED bed congestion.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S69-S70
Author(s):  
Heather Carmichael ◽  
Sarah E Mather ◽  
Tyler M Smith ◽  
Patrick S Duffy ◽  
Arek J Wiktor ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Despite significant morbidity and mortality for major burns, palliative care consultation (PCC) is underutilized in this population. While use of PCC is increasing, a prior study showed that less than 2% of patients with major burns had PCC during admission. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of a protocol using recommended “triggers” for PCC at a single academic burn center. Methods This is a retrospective review of patient deaths over a four-year period (9/2016–8/2020). Use of life-sustaining treatments, comfort care (de-escalation of one or more life-sustaining treatments) and do not resuscitate (DNR) orders were determined. Use of PCC was compared during periods before and after a protocol establishing recommended “triggers” for early (< 48 hrs of admission) PCC was instituted in 2019. Triggers included Baux score > 100 and/or complex decisions about treatment including need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)/renal replacement therapy (RRT)/vasopressors, or at least two of the following: age > 70, major comorbidities, disagreement amongst family/patient/providers about best course of treatment, or no longer meeting expected milestones. Results A total of 33 patient deaths were reviewed. Most patients were male (n=28, 85%) and median age was 62 years [IQR 42–72]. Median Baux score was 112 [IQR 81–133]. Eleven patients (33%) had major comorbidities. Many patients had life-sustaining interventions such as intubation, RRT, or CPR, often prior to admission. Amongst patients who survived >24 hrs, 67% (n=14/21) had PCC. Frequency of PCC increased after protocol development, with 100% vs. 36% of patients having PCC before death (p=0.004). However, even during the later period, only half of patients had early PCC despite meeting criteria at admission. Conclusions Frequently, initiation of life-sustaining measures in severely injured burn patients occurs prior to or early during hospitalization. Thus, early goals of care discussions are valuable to prevent interventions that do not align with patient values and assist with de-escalation of life-sustaining treatment. In this small sample, we found that while there was increasing use of PCC overall after developing a protocol of recommended “triggers” for consultation, many patients who met criteria at admission did not receive early PCC.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Smith ◽  
Kathleen Bledsoe ◽  
Thomas Madden ◽  
Jamie Artale ◽  
Ted Sindlinger

Introduction: The utility of pharmacist-managed collaborative practice agreements (CPA) in the management of hypertension is well established in the outpatient setting. There has been little evaluation of the use of CPAs in the inpatient acute care setting, and none described specifically in the vascular neurology population. Treatment of hypertension is a critical intervention for the secondary prevention of acute ischemic stroke. This quality improvement project evaluated the implementation of a CPA for the inpatient acute care management of hypertension in vascular neurology patients at University of Virginia Health. Methods: A CPA was developed between the neurosciences clinical pharmacist group and the inpatient vascular neurology service, legally vetted, and implemented in June 2019. All vascular neurology patient charts in which an electronic CPA referral was placed from June 2019 through June 2020 were reviewed. Patients were excluded if they were discharged within 24 hours of the referral being placed. The primary objective was to describe and evaluate the implementation of a pharmacist-driven hypertension management practice in the inpatient acute care setting. All patient demographic and clinical data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Secondary safety outcomes included documented hypotensive events (SBP <90) and acute kidney injury (AKI, increase in SCr by 0.3 mg/dl within 48 hours). Results: During the study period, 26 referrals were placed, and 19 patients were included for review. On average, patients were on 2 anti-hypertensive medications prior to admission. From the time of referral to discharge (mean 6 days), systolic blood pressure (SBP) was reduced on average by 36 mmHg (mean percentage reduction 20%) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 12 mmHg (mean percentage reduction 7%). Ten patients (53%) met the goal of SBP < 140 at discharge. There were 5 hypotensive events and 4 instances of AKI, all of which were mild and recovered prior to discharge. Conclusion: A pharmacist-managed hypertension CPA was successfully implemented in vascular neurology patients in the inpatient acute care setting. The practice demonstrated improved blood pressure control and minimal adverse outcomes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 489-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia L. Cummings

Moral distress and professional stress affect the lives of acute care nurses everyday. The impact of these stressors may be causing nurses to leave the acute care setting. This paper will outline the findings from a descriptive study of acute care nurses in Northeast Florida. The research was conducted in an effort to highlight some of the critical factors that impact nurses in the acute care setting and affect their intent to stay at an institution. The concepts of moral distress and professional stress in relation to nursing retention are highlighted and some strategies for lessening of these stressors are proposed. The study was correlational and conducted among 234 nurses in an institutional setting. The study included an online survey based on established Moral Distress and Professional Stress tools. In addition, a qualitative section was included to explore the nurses’ experiences of stressful inpatient situations. The results of this study demonstrated that when combined, both professional stress and moral distress items were predictive of the nurses’ intent to stay at the institution ( p <.001).


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 203
Author(s):  
Randol Kennedy ◽  
Nabilah Abdullah ◽  
Rhajarshi Bhadra ◽  
NanaOsei Bonsu ◽  
Mojtaba Fayezizadeh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document