scholarly journals Palliative Care Utilization, Transfusion Burden and Symptoms for Patients with Multiple Myeloma at the End of Life

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4103-4103
Author(s):  
Geoffrey McInturf ◽  
Kimberly Younger ◽  
Courtney Sanchez ◽  
Charles Walde ◽  
Al-Ola Abdallah ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Despite dramatic treatment advances , multiple myeloma (MM) remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality with 13,000 deaths expected annually in the United States. We characterized patterns of mortality, palliative care involvement, and disease course at the end of life for patients with MM over the last decade. Methods: We assessed all consecutive deceased patients with a diagnosis of MM who received health care at a single health care institution from January 2010 to December 2020. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to data review. Descriptive statistics were employed, and chi square was used to compare categorical variables. Results: A total of 456 patients were identified. Patient characteristics and outcomes are listed in Table 1. In the year prior to death, the prevalence of depression was 45.8% (209 patients), whereas 75.4% of patients were on opiates as an outpatient (344 patients). The mean number of lines of treatment received from diagnosis to death was 3 (range 0-12). Two-hundred eleven (46.3%) patients required red blood cell transfusions in the year prior to death. Palliative care physicians saw 207 (45.4%) patients, of which 97 (46.9%) were seen as outpatient (including those who saw both outpatient and inpatient), and 110 (53.1%) exclusively as an inpatient. The median time from first palliative care consultation to death was 10 days for inpatient palliative care (range 0-389 days), and 107 days for outpatient palliative care (range 2-2028 days). Only 42 (9.2%) patients saw palliative care ≥6 months prior to death. Compared to those patients who did not see palliative care, those that saw palliative care ≥6 months prior to death were more likely to be female (61.9 versus 42.2%, p=0.05), younger (median age at diagnosis 66 versus 71, p=0.03), and have a longer survival (46 months versus 35 months, p=0.006) (Table 1 and Figure 1). Amongst the patients for whom place of death was clearly reported (351, 77%), 117 patients (33.3%) died in the acute care setting, 110 (31.3%) died in a hospice facility, and 124 (35.3%) died at home. Outpatient palliative care consultation did not correlate with a statistically significant difference in deaths in an acute care setting (22/81, 27.2% seeing outpatient palliative care versus 57/174, 32.8% for those who did not, p=0.36), or in chemotherapy (any active treatment other than just steroids) utilization in last month of life (30.9% versus 29.7%, p=0.83). Conclusion: In our analysis of the entire trajectory of the MM patient experience from diagnosis to death, we found a substantial proportion of patients with MM report depression, need opiates for pain control, require blood transfusions and are repeatedly hospitalized in the year prior to their death. A fifth of all deaths occur within a year of diagnosis. With a median of three lines of therapy from diagnosis to death, patients may not live to experience therapies reserved for later lines of treatment. A minority of these patients see a palliative care physician during their treatment journey with the median time from palliative care consultation to death only a month. Palliative care referral at this health system is physician-initiated and not based on standard criteria, which may impact these findings. While there is no clear correlation that palliative care consultation impacted the rate of acute care deaths or decreased utilization of MM treatment in the last month of life, (two common but complicated proxies for quality of end-of-life care), further prospective research on optimal utilization of specialist palliative care is required. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sborov: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkylineDx: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e760-e769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Triplett ◽  
Wendi G. LeBrett ◽  
Alex K. Bryant ◽  
Andrew R. Bruggeman ◽  
Rayna K. Matsuno ◽  
...  

Purpose: Palliative care’s role in oncology has expanded, but its effect on aggressiveness of care at the end of life has not been characterized at the population level. Methods: This matched retrospective cohort study examined the effect of an encounter with palliative care on health-care use at the end of life among 6,580 Medicare beneficiaries with advanced prostate, breast, lung, or colorectal cancer. We compared health-care use before and after palliative care consultation to a matched nonpalliative care cohort. Results: The palliative care cohort had higher rates of health-care use in the 30 days before palliative care consultation compared with the nonpalliative cohort, with higher rates of hospitalization (risk ratio [RR], 3.33; 95% CI, 2.87 to 3.85), invasive procedures (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.62 to 1.88), and chemotherapy administration (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.45 to 1.78). The opposite pattern emerged in the interval from palliative care consultation through death, where the palliative care cohort had lower rates of hospitalization (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44-0.65), invasive procedures (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.59), and chemotherapy administration (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.53). Patients with earlier palliative care consultation in their disease course had larger absolute reductions in health-care use compared with those with palliative care consultation closer to the end of life. Conclusion: This population-based study found that palliative care substantially decreased health-care use among Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer. Given the increasing number of elderly patients with advanced cancer, this study emphasizes the importance of early integration of palliative care alongside standard oncologic care.


2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donnelle Daly ◽  
Stephen Chavez Matzel

A transdisciplinary team is an essential component of palliative and end-of-life care. This article will demonstrate how to develop a transdisciplinary approach to palliative care, incorporating nursing, social work, spiritual care, and pharmacy in an acute care setting. Objectives included: identifying transdisciplinary roles contributing to care in the acute care setting; defining the palliative care model and mission; identifying patient/ family and institutional needs; and developing palliative care tools. Methods included a needs assessment and the development of assessment tools, an education program, community resources, and a patient satisfaction survey. After 1 year of implementation, the transdisciplinary palliative care team consisted of seven palliative care physicians, two social workers, two chaplains, a pharmacist, and End-of-Life Nursing Consortium (ELNEC) trained nurses. Palomar Health now has a palliative care service with a consistent process for transdisciplinary communication and intervention for adult critical care patients with advanced, chronic illness.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina R. O’Connor ◽  
Paul Junker ◽  
Scott M. Appel ◽  
Robert L. Stetson ◽  
Jeffrey Rohrbach ◽  
...  

Background: Hospitals are under increasing pressure to manage costs across multiple episodes of care. Most studies of the financial impact of palliative care have focused on costs during a single hospitalization. Objective: To compare future acute health-care costs and utilization between patients who received inpatient palliative care consultation for goals of care (Palliative Care Service [PCS]) and a propensity-matched cohort of patients who did not receive palliative care consultation (non-PCS) in a single academic medical center. Methods: Data were extracted from the hospital’s electronic records for admissions and discharges between July 2014 and October 2016. A stratified propensity score matching was used to account for nonrandom assignment and potential inherent differences between PCS and non-PCS groups using variables of theoretical interest: age, gender, race, diagnosis, risk of mortality, and prior acute care costs. Results: The analytical sample for this study included 41 363 patients (PCS = 1853; non-PCS = 39 510). Future acute care costs were significantly higher in the non-PCS group after propensity score matching (highest tier = US$15 654 vs US$8831; second highest tier = US$12 200 vs US$5496; P = .0001). The non-PCS group also had significantly higher future acute care utilization across all propensity tiers and outcomes including 30-day readmission ( P = .0001), number of future hospital days ( P = .0001), and number of future intensive care unit days ( P = .0001). Conclusion: Palliative care consultations for goals of care may decrease future health-care utilization with cost savings that persist into future hospitalizations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Lees ◽  
S. Weerasinghe ◽  
N. Lamond ◽  
T. Younis ◽  
Ravi Ramjeesingh

Background Palliative care (pc) consultation has been associated with less aggressive care at end of life in a number of malignancies, but the effect of the consultation timing has not yet been fully characterized. For patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (upcc), aggressive and resource-intensive treatment at the end of life can be costly, but not necessarily of better quality. In the present study, we investigated the association, if any, between the timing of specialist pc consultation and indicators of aggressive care at end of life in patients with upcc.Methods This retrospective cohort study examined the potential effect of the timing of specialist pc consultation on key indicators of aggressive care at end of life in all patients diagnosed with upcc in Nova Scotia between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015. Statistical analysis included univariable and multivariable logistic regression.Results In the 365 patients identified for inclusion in the study, specialist pc consultation was found to be associated with decreased odds of experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life; however, the timing of the consultation was not significant. Residency in an urban area was associated with decreased odds of experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life. We observed no association between experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life and consultation with medical oncology or radiation oncology.Conclusions Regardless of timing, specialist pc consultation was associated with decreased odds of experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life. That finding provides further evidence to support the integral role of pc in managing patients with a life-limiting malignancy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 203
Author(s):  
Randol Kennedy ◽  
Nabilah Abdullah ◽  
Rhajarshi Bhadra ◽  
NanaOsei Bonsu ◽  
Mojtaba Fayezizadeh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document