Nitrogen- and sulfur-doped zinc ferrite nanoparticles as efficient heterogeneous catalysts in advanced oxidation processes

2022 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 110398
Author(s):  
Akhil Hareendran ◽  
Elsa Dais ◽  
Denna Shinoy ◽  
S. Srikripa ◽  
Grace Maria Shibu ◽  
...  
Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 3010
Author(s):  
Eva Domingues ◽  
Maria João Silva ◽  
Telma Vaz ◽  
João Gomes ◽  
Rui C. Martins

Wastewaters from the olive oil industry are a regional environmental problem. Their phenolic content provides inherent toxicity, which reduces the treatment potential of conventional biological systems. In this study, Sulfate Radical based Advanced Oxidation Processes (SRbAOPs) are compared with advanced oxidation processes (namely Fenton’s peroxidation) as a depuration alternative. Synthetic olive mill wastewaters were submitted to homogeneous and heterogeneous SRbAOPs using iron sulfate and solid catalysts (red mud and Fe-Ce-O) as the source of iron (II). The homogenous process was optimized by testing different pH values, as well as iron and persulfate loads. At the best conditions (pH 5, 300 mg/L of iron and 600 mg/L of persulfate), it was possible to achieve 39%, 63% and 37% COD, phenolic compounds and TOC removal, respectively. The catalytic potential of a waste (red mud) and a laboratory material (Fe-Ce-O) was tested using heterogenous SRbAOPs. The best performance was achieved by Fe-Ce-O, with an optimal load of 1600 mg/L. At these conditions, 27%, 55% and 5% COD, phenolic compounds and TOC removal were obtained, respectively. Toxicity tests on A. fischeri and L. sativum showed no improvements in toxicity from the treated solutions when compared with the original one. Thus, SRbAOPs use a suitable technology for synthetic OMW.


RSC Advances ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 5197-5211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Baloyi ◽  
Thabang Ntho ◽  
John Moma

The use of pillared interlayered clays (PILCs) as heterogenous catalysts in wastewater treatment technologies, particularly advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), is gaining popularity for the treatment of refractory wastewater effluents.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (24) ◽  
pp. 12103
Author(s):  
Antía Fdez-Sanromán ◽  
Rocío Martinez-Treinta ◽  
Marta Pazos ◽  
Emilio Rosales ◽  
María Ángeles Sanromán

The hunt for efficient and environmentally friendly degradation processes has positioned the heterogeneous advanced oxidation processes as an alternative more interesting and economical rather than homogenous processes. Hence, the current study lies in investigating the efficiency of different heterogeneous catalysts using transition metals in order to prevent the generation of iron sludge and to extend the catalogue of possible catalysts to be used in advanced oxidation processes. In this study, nickel and zinc were tested and the ability for radical-generation degradation capacity of both ions as homogeneous was evaluated in the electro-Fenton-like degradation of 2-phenylphenol. In both cases, the degradation profiles followed a first-order kinetic model with the highest degradation rate for nickel (1 mM) with 2-phenylphenol removal level of 90.12% and a total organic reduction near 70% in 2 h. To synthesise the heterogeneous nickel catalyst, this transition metal was fixed on perlite by hydrothermal treatment and in a biochar or carbon nanofibers by adsorption. From the removal results using the three synthesized catalysts, it is concluded that the best catalysts were obtained by inclusion of nickel on biochar or nanofibers achieving in both with removal around 80% before 1 h. Thus, to synthetize a nickel electrocatalyst, nickel doped nanofibers were included on carbon felt. To do this, the amount of carbon black, nickel nanofibers and polytetrafluoroethylene to add on the carbon felt was optimized by Taguchi design. The obtained results revealed that under the optimised conditions, a near-complete removal was achieved after 2 h with high stability of the nickel electrocatalyst that open the applicability of this heterogeneous system to operate in flow systems.


2015 ◽  
Vol 240 ◽  
pp. 46-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailesh S. Sable ◽  
Pallavi P. Ghute ◽  
Pedro Álvarez ◽  
Fernando J. Beltrán ◽  
Francesc Medina ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document