scholarly journals Critically appraised paper: In people with inoperable lung cancer, home-based rehabilitation provides no benefit over usual care in optimising functional exercise capacity [synopsis]

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Vinicius Cavalheri
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e050362
Author(s):  
Md Nazim Uzzaman ◽  
Soo Chin Chan ◽  
Ranita Hisham Shunmugam ◽  
Julia Patrick Engkasan ◽  
Dhiraj Agarwal ◽  
...  

IntroductionChronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are common and disabling conditions that can result in social isolation and economic hardship for patients and their families. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) but practical barriers to attending centre-based sessions or the need for infection control limits accessibility. Home-PR offers a potential solution that may improve access. We aim to systematically review the clinical effectiveness, completion rates and components of Home-PR for people with CRDs compared with Centre-PR or Usual care.Methods and analysisWe will search PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PeDRO and PsycInfo from January 1990 to date using a PICOS search strategy (Population: adults with CRDs; Intervention: Home-PR; Comparator: Centre-PR/Usual care; Outcomes: functional exercise capacity and HRQoL; Setting: any setting). The strategy is to search for ‘Chronic Respiratory Disease’ AND ‘Pulmonary Rehabilitation’ AND ‘Home-PR’, and identify relevant randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials. Six reviewers working in pairs will independently screen articles for eligibility and extract data from those fulfilling the inclusion criteria. We will use the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate the quality of evidence. We will perform meta-analysis or narrative synthesis as appropriate to answer our three research questions: (1) what is the effectiveness of Home-PR compared with Centre-PR or Usual care? (2) what components are used in effective Home-PR studies? and (3) what is the completion rate of Home-PR compared with Centre-PR?Ethics and disseminationResearch ethics approval is not required since the study will review only published data. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation in conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020220137.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153473542092338
Author(s):  
Masato Oikawa ◽  
Masatoshi Hanada ◽  
Hiroki Nagura ◽  
Tomoshi Tsuchiya ◽  
Keitaro Matsumoto ◽  
...  

Purpose: We investigated, in patients who underwent lung resection for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the magnitude of early limitation in functional exercise capacity and the associations with pre- and postoperative factors. Methods: Consecutive patients with preoperative clinical stage I to IIIA NSCLC who underwent lung resection were prospectively enrolled. We measured functional exercise capacity (6-minute walk distance [6MWD]) and skeletal muscle strength (handgrip [HF] and quadriceps force [QF]) within 2 days prior to surgery and on day 7 postoperatively. Results: Two hundred eighteen participants were recruited (median age 69 years) of whom 49 developed postoperative complications (POCs). 6MWD was markedly decreased (514 m vs 469 m, P < .001); HF and QF were slightly decreased following surgery. Multiple linear regression showed that preoperative vital capacity ( P < .01), QF ( P < .05), the duration of chest tube drainage ( P < .001), and presence of POCs ( P < .05) were significant predictors. However, intraoperative factors were not significantly associated with the decline in 6MWD. Conclusions: These results suggest that patients with preoperative impairments in pulmonary function and muscle strength, and those who require prolonged chest tube drainage or develop POCs are likely to have impaired exercise capacity. Therefore, individual assessment and follow-up of patients with such factors is indicated.


Author(s):  
Maria Tereza Morano ◽  
Mariana A. B. Duailibe ◽  
Amanda S. Araújo ◽  
Ingrid C. Nogueira ◽  
Cyntia Maria S. Viana ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine L. Granger ◽  
Linda Denehy ◽  
Selina M. Parry ◽  
Joel Martin ◽  
Tim Dimitriadis ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1019-1029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigrid N.W. Vorrink ◽  
Helianthe S.M. Kort ◽  
Thierry Troosters ◽  
Pieter Zanen ◽  
Jan-Willem J. Lammers

Physical inactivity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with poor health status and increased disease burden. The present study aims to test the efficacy of a previously developed mobile (m)Health intervention to improve or maintain physical activity in patients with COPD after pulmonary rehabilitation.A randomised controlled trial was performed in 32 physiotherapy practices in the Netherlands. COPD patients were randomised into intervention or usual care groups. The intervention consisted of a smartphone application for the patients and a monitoring website for the physiotherapists. Measurements were performed at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months. Physical activity, functional exercise capacity, lung function, health-related quality of life and body mass index were assessed.157 patients started the study and 121 completed it. There were no significant positive effects of the intervention on physical activity (at 0 months: intervention 5824±3418 steps per weekday, usual care 5717±2870 steps per weekday; at 12 months: intervention 4819±2526 steps per weekday, usual care 4950±2634 steps per weekday; p=0.811) or on the secondary end-points. There was a significant decrease over time in physical activity (p<0.001), lung function (p<0.001) and mastery (p=0.017), but not in functional exercise capacity (p=0.585).Although functional exercise capacity did not deteriorate, our mHealth intervention did not improve or maintain physical activity in patients with COPD after a period of pulmonary rehabilitation.


Author(s):  
Naciye Vardar Yağlı ◽  
Kübra Kılıç ◽  
Melda Saglam ◽  
Ebru Calık Kütükcü ◽  
Deniz Inal Ince ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linn T. Aalstad ◽  
Jon A. Hardie ◽  
Birgitte Espehaug ◽  
Einar Thorsen ◽  
Per S. Bakke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document