Psychometric evaluation of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) in cancer patients: Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 556-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Ashley ◽  
Adam B. Smith ◽  
Ada Keding ◽  
Helen Jones ◽  
Galina Velikova ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Mukhlid Alshammari ◽  
Jed Duff ◽  
Michelle Guilhermino

Abstract Background This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the patient-centered communication instrument. Methods A self-administered instrument was used over 4 months by 318 participants living with cancer in Saudi Arabia. The instrument contained 36 items assessing patient-centered communication (PCC-36) experiences. The PCC-36 instrument was translated into Arabic following the World Health Organization guidelines for translating instruments before undergoing psychometric evaluation. This involved confirmatory factor analysis for each of the PCC-36 functions and testing the reliability and internal consistency of the PCC-36 measures. Results The Arabic-translated PCC-36 version demonstrated a good correlation between items, with confirmatory factor analysis showing a good fit of the data (comparative fit index = 0.922, Tucker–Lewis index = 0.910, root mean square error approximation = 0.059, ${\chi ^2}$ = 1214.4, df = 579, P < 0.001). Internal consistency of the total six PCC-36 functions was confirmed by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.97. Conclusions The study proved that the PCC-36 Arabic version is a valid and reliable instrument for the measurement of patient communication experiences in cancer care in Saudi Arabia, with similar properties to the original, and that this instrument may be used in 22 different Arab countries to measure and improve cancer patients’ communication experiences.


2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leopoldo J. Cabassa ◽  
Isabel T. Lagomasino ◽  
Megan Dwight-Johnson ◽  
Marissa C. Hansen ◽  
Bin Xie

2017 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 548-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rina S. Fox ◽  
Teresa A. Lillis ◽  
James Gerhart ◽  
Michael Hoerger ◽  
Paul Duberstein

The DASS-21 is a public domain instrument that is commonly used to evaluate depression and anxiety in psychiatric and community populations; however, the factor structure of the measure has not previously been examined in oncologic settings. Given that the psychometric properties of measures of distress may be compromised in the context of symptoms related to cancer and its treatment, the present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the DASS-21 Depression and Anxiety scales in cancer patients ( n = 376) as compared to noncancer control participants ( n = 207). Cancer patients ranged in age from 21 to 84 years (mean = 58.3, standard deviation = 10.4) and noncancer control participants ranged in age from 18 to 81 years (mean = 45.0, standard deviation = 11.7). Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis supported the structural invariance of the DASS-21 Depression and Anxiety scales across groups; the factor variance/covariance invariance model was the best fit to the data. Cronbach’s coefficient alpha values demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability across the total sample as well as within subgroups of cancer patients and noncancer control participants. Expected relationships of DASS-21 Depression and Anxiety scale scores to measures of suicidal ideation, quality of life, self-rated health, and depressed mood supported construct validity. These results support the psychometric properties of the DASS-21 Depression and Anxiety scales when measuring psychological distress in cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arezoo Yari ◽  
Yadolah Zarezadeh ◽  
Abbas Rahimiforoushani ◽  
Ali Ardalan ◽  
Mohsen Soufi Boubakran ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Determination of the causes of flood-related deaths is the precondition for effective interventions aimed at the reduction of such deaths. There is a gap in the design and the development of a valid and reliable tool for measuring underlying factors of death in the flood.Methods: A complete set of causes of flood deaths was collected. After forming the pool of items, an initial questionnaire was designed and divided into two parts of objective and subjective factors. The questionnaire’s psychometric evaluation was performed for the subjective part.Results: At the design stage, the objective and subjective sections were designed. During the psychometric evaluation, the number of items was reduced. While measuring the content validity 13 questions were excluded. Finally, a 33-item questionnaire was developed in seven categories. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the KMO coefficient was higher than .05 for all constructs. The internal consistency of the instrument using Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92. Finally, in order to perform the stability test, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for all questions. This was above .05 and acceptable.Conclusions: FAFDQ can be used to make decisions, identify groups at risk of flood-related deaths, and implement flood-related death-reduction interventions. Indeed, these measures have led to the development of a comprehensive and reliable questionnaire for measuring the factors affecting flood deaths: a comprehensive set of factors that can be scientifically and accurately classified as flood-related deaths, appropriately categorizing the subjective and objective factors, psychometric assessment of the SFAFDQ, confirmatory factor analysis and questionnaire testing in a case-control Study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document