Corrigendum to “U–Pb, Re–Os and Ar–Ar dating of the Linghou polymetallic deposit, Southeastern China: Implications for metallogenesis of the Qingzhou–Hangzhou metallogenic belt” [J. Asian Earth Sci. 137 (2017) 163–179]

2021 ◽  
pp. 104719
Author(s):  
Yanwen Tang ◽  
Yuling Xie ◽  
Liang Liu ◽  
Tingguan Lan ◽  
Jianling Yang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaozhuang Xi ◽  
Minghong Zheng ◽  
Ling He ◽  
Haodong Xia

AbstractThe Abra deposit, a large lead-silver-copper–gold polymetallic deposit in Western Australia, is located at the eastern of the metallogenic belt of the Jillawarra basin in the Bangemall basin. The 4th to the 6th rock section of the Irrigully Group of Edmund Series are the principal ore-host strata, composed mainly of sandstone and fine sandstone. The orebody in Abra can be classified into two types as upper layer-like lead-silver and lower veins or netvein copper–gold. The metal minerals are mainly galena, chalcopyrite, and pyrite, while the gangue minerals are mainly quartz, dolomite, and barite. Both Re-Os isotopic age of the pyrite (1329.5 ± 98 Ma) with the initial (187Os/188Os) = 5.0 ± 3.8 and Pb isotopic compositions (206Pb/204Pb = 15.914–15.967, 207Pb/204Pb = 15.425–15.454, 208Pb/204Pb = 35.584–35.667) suggests that the metal minerals were sourced from the wall-rocks. δDV-SMOW values of quartz range from -35‰ to -17‰ whereas δ18OV-SMOW value range from 12‰ to 16‰ which indicates that the ore-forming fluids of Abra were medium–low temperature and medium–low salinity, and were mainly metamorphic water and secondary atmospheric precipitation. When the medium–low temperature ore-forming fluids are mixed with oxidizing reducing fluids carrying a large number of metal substances, a large number of ore-forming substances will be precipitated when the physical and chemical conditions change, thus it can be considered that the Abra deposit is a medium–low temperature hydrothermal polymetallic deposit.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 475-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Zhang ◽  
Jing-Gui Sun ◽  
Shu-Wen Xing ◽  
Zeng-Jie Zhang

The Lesser Xing’an Range is located in the eastern segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. It hosts an important polymetallic metallogenic belt that contains more than 20 large- to small-scale porphyry Mo, epithermal Au, and skarn Fe-polymetallic deposits. The Cuihongshan Fe-polymetallic deposit is one of the largest polymetallic deposits in northeastern China. To better understand the formation of the Cuihongshan Fe-polymetallic deposit, we investigated the geological characteristics of the Cuihongshan deposit and applied geochemistry and geochronology to constrain the timing of the mineralization, and characteristics of the magmas. Zircon U–Pb dating of the alkali-feldspar granite and monzogranite yielded weighted mean 206Pb/238U ages of 495 ± 1.6 and 203 ± 1 Ma, respectively. Re–Os dating on molybdenite yielded an isochron age of 203.2 ± 1.4 Ma, and 40Ar/39Ar dating on phlogopite yielded an age of 203.4 ± 1.3 Ma. These data suggest that mineralization occurred during the Late Triassic, and is closely related with the monzogranite emplacement. These rocks belong to the high-K calc-alkaline and subalkaline series, are enriched in Rb, U, and Th, are depleted in Nb, Ta, and Ti, and show strong Eu anomalies, implying that they are A-type post-orogenic rocks. The Cuihongshan Fe-polymetallic formation is possibly related to an extensional environment resulting from the final closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 609
Author(s):  
Wenbao Zheng ◽  
Yiyun Wang

Jiama is a super-large porphyry copper–polymetallic deposit located in the Gangdese metallogenic belt of southern Tibet. The deposit consists of a combination of a polymetallic skarn, Cu–Mo mineralization at the contact between the Jiama Porphyry and hornfels, and distal Au mineralization in fault. The current metal reserves are 7.4 Mt Cu, 0.6 Mt Mo, 1.8 Mt Pb–Zn, 6.65 Moz Au, and 360.32 Moz Ag, with a skarn to porphyry–hornfels host-rock ratio of ~3:1. Based on detailed field and laboratory investigations, this paper indicates that: (i) the skarn and porphyry–hornfels orebodies are almost entirely preserved; (ii) the emplacement age of the Cu-bearing plutonic rocks is earlier than the plutons containing elevated Mo assays; (iii) the permeability of the wall rocks gradually decreases in an upward direction; (iv) the fluid temperature during the precipitation of Cu was higher than that of the Mo mineralization; (v) the lithospheric pressure during the precipitation of Cu and Mo was the same; (vi) the laser Raman spectroscopy shows that the fluid carrying the Cu was rich in magnetite, hematite, and anhydrite, and the fluid carrying Mo was rich in pyrite, CO2, and CH4; and (vii) the SR–XRF mapping shows that the concentration of Cu in the mineralizing fluid was high and that of Mo was low when Cu was deposited. Conversely, the concentration of Cu was relatively low and the concentration of Mo was relatively high during deposition of the Mo. This study also shows that the temporal and spatial separation of Cu and Mo in the porphyry copper–polymetallic deposit at Jiama was associated with the emplacement of the Jiama Porphyry. Transportation of mineralized fluid was controlled by the permeability of the wall rocks, and deposition of the metals related to changes along a redox front and pressure releases during hydrothermal brecciation at the roof of the Jiama Porphyry.


Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Zhongping Tao ◽  
Bingli Liu ◽  
Ke Guo ◽  
Na Guo ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
...  

The identification of primary geochemical haloes can be used to predict mineral resources in deep-seated orebodies through the delineation of element distributions. The Jiama deposits a typical skarn–porphyry Cu–polymetallic deposit in the Gangdese metallogenic belt of Tibet. The Cu–polymetallic skarn, Cu–Mo hornfels, and Mo ± Cu porphyry mineralization there exhibit superimposed geochemical haloes at depth. Three-dimensional (3D) primary geochemical halo modeling was undertaken for the deposit with the aim of providing geochemical data to describe element distributions in 3D space. An overall geochemical zonation of Zn(Pb) → Au → Cu(Ag) → Mo gained from geochemical cross-sections, together with dip-direction skarn zonation Pb–Zn(Cu) → Cu(Au–Ag–Mo) → Mo(Cu) → Cu–Mo(Au–Ag) and vertical zonation Cu–(Pb–Zn) → Mo–(Cu) → Mo–Cu–(Ag–Au–Pb–Zn) → Mo in the #24 exploration profile, indicates potential mineralization at depth. Integrated geochemical anomalies were extracted by kernel principal component analysis, which has the advantage of accommodating nonlinear data. A maximum-entropy model was constructed for deep mineral resources of uncertainty prediction. Three potential deep mineral targets are proposed on the basis of the obtained geochemical information and background.


Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Rui-Chun Duan ◽  
Shao-Yong Jiang

Qinzhou-Hangzhou metallogenic belt is an important polymetallic (Cu, Mo, W, Sn, Pb, Zn, Au, and Ag) belt in South China. The Xinmin polymetallic deposit is located in the southwestern segment of this belt, which ore bodies hosted in the contact zone of granite and Lower Devonian sedimentary strata and in the structure fractured zone within the strata. Three hydrothermal stages can be distinguished: quartz+tourmaline+pyrite (early stage), tourmaline+pyrite+galena+bismuthinite+sphalerite+chalcopyrite+pyrrhotite (main stage), and quartz+calcite+dolomite (late stage). The mineralizing fluid system can be described as aqueous with medium-high salinity (2.7-50.7 wt.‰ NaCl equiv. in the main stage and 0.18-8.81 wt.‰ NaCl equiv. in the late stage) and medium-high temperature of 485°C to 205°C (main stage) and 300°C to 116°C (late stage). The trapping pressures varied from 2 MPa to 30 MPa (main stage) and 0.4 MPa to 9 MPa (late stage). The δ 18 O values of quartz range from 6.7‰ to 8.5‰, and the δ D values for fluid inclusions in quartz range from -45‰ to -52‰. The calcite has C-isotopes ranging from -5.8‰ to +0.7‰ and O-isotopes from +12.7‰ to 21.4‰. H-O-C isotope data are consistent with a hydrothermal fluid derived from the Cretaceous granitoid magma. The δ 34 S values of sulfides are -3.3‰ to +1.9‰. Sulfides have 206Pb/204Pb ratios of 18.377 to 18.473, 207Pb/204Pb ratios of 15.606 to 16.684, and 208Pb/204Pb ratios of 38.613 to 38.902. The S-Pb isotope data suggest derivation of S and Pb mainly from the Cretaceous granitic magma. It is concluded that the Xinmin deposit is a medium-high temperature, medium-high salinity hydrothermal polymetallic deposit, related to the granitic magmatism and strictly controlled by the fault and shattered zones.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document