Sharps and Needlestick Injuries Among Medical Students, Surgical Residents, Faculty, and Operating Room Staff at a Single Academic Institution

2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Y. Choi ◽  
Rosalicia Torres ◽  
Sohail Syed ◽  
Sean Boyle ◽  
Ashar Ata ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-44
Author(s):  
Gabriel Bakula ◽  
Manu Kaushik ◽  
Claudia Jarrin Tejada ◽  
Vijay Mittal

Author(s):  
Yisi D. Ji ◽  
Sophia K. McKinley ◽  
Michael Farrell ◽  
Maureen Hemingway ◽  
Motaz Qadan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110110
Author(s):  
Rahima Khatun ◽  
Banan W. Otaibi ◽  
Anna Ssentongo ◽  
Joshua P. Hazelton ◽  
AmandaB. Cooper

Background In situations of increased need, such as mass casualty incidents (MCIs) and COVID-19, donated blood products are in shortage across the United States. Medical students are a potential pool for blood donors. The aim of this study was to determine overall attitudes of medical students at a single academic institution toward blood donation during times of increased need. Methods Three anonymous REDCap surveys were administered to all medical students at a rural academic institution. Surveys 1 and 2 were administered preceding and after an institution-wide MCI drill, in September and November 2019, respectively. Survey 3 was administered following a student-organized COVID-19 blood drive in June 2020. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine if factors, ie, experience with MCI drills and emergency medical services (EMS) training, were associated with willingness to donate blood. Furthermore, barriers to donation among those not willing to donate were assessed. Results Overall response rate for MCI surveys (surveys 1 and 2) was 38% (mean age 25.2 years and 50% women). 91% (n = 210) of respondents were willing to donate blood. Previous participation in MCI drills and EMS training was not associated with higher willingness to donate blood. Response rate for survey 3 was 15.6% (59.4% women), and 30 (31.3%) respondents indicated they did not volunteer to donate blood during the COVID-19 drive. Most common reasons for not donating were “other,” medical concerns, and being out-of-town. Conclusions Majority of medical students are willing to donate blood during times of increased need and offer a possible solution to increase blood donor pool.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Tan ◽  
James Reeves Mbori Ngwayi ◽  
Zhaohan Ding ◽  
Yufa Zhou ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ten years after the introduction of the Chinese Ministry of Health (MoH) version of Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) we wished to assess the ongoing influence of the World Health Organisation (WHO) SSC by observing all three checklist components during elective surgical procedures in China, as well as survey operating room staff and surgeons more widely about the WHO SSC. Methods A questionnaire was designed to gain authentic views on the WHO SSC. We also conducted a prospective cross-sectional study at five level 3 hospitals. Local data collectors were trained to document specific item performance. Adverse events which delayed the operation were recorded as well as the individuals leading or participating in the three SSC components. Results A total of 846 operating room staff and surgeons from 138 hospitals representing every mainland province responded to the survey. There was widespread acceptance of the checklist and its value in improving patient safety. 860 operations were observed for SSC compliance. Overall compliance was 79.8%. Compliance in surgeon-dependent items of the ‘time-out’ component reduced when it was nurse-led (p < 0.0001). WHO SSC interventions which are omitted from the MoH SSC continued to be discussed over half the time. Overall adverse events rate was 2.7%. One site had near 100% compliance in association with a circulating inspection team which had power of sanction. Conclusion The WHO SSC remains a powerful tool for surgical patient safety in China. Cultural changes in nursing assertiveness and surgeon-led teamwork and checklist ownership are the key elements for improving compliance. Standardised audits are required to monitor and ensure checklist compliance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-68
Author(s):  
Yousef Marwan ◽  
Lucy Luo ◽  
Asra Toobaie ◽  
Thierry Benaroch ◽  
Linda Snell

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. e90-e91
Author(s):  
Melissa Kirkwood ◽  
Khalil Chamseddin ◽  
Gary Arbique ◽  
Jeffrey Guild ◽  
David Timaran ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-247
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Sanford ◽  
Mitchell H. Tsai ◽  
Bassam Kadry ◽  
Christopher R. Mayhew ◽  
David C. Adams

ABSTRACT  Some research has found increased incidence of medical errors in teaching hospitals at the beginning of the academic year and have termed this the “July Phenomenon.”Background  Our primary hypothesis was that the “July Phenomenon” for anesthesiology and surgical residents might manifest itself as operational inefficiency, measured by monthly total operating room (OR) minutes. Secondary measures were monthly elective overutilized minutes (OR workload minus OR allocated time, after 5:30 pm at our institution), 80th percentile number of ORs running at 7:00 pm, and mean last room end time.Objective  Data were collected retrospectively from a 525-bed academic tertiary care hospital from January 2010 to September 2014 and were deconstructed to assess for a seasonal component using local regression (Loess). Variable month length was addressed by transforming the monthly totals to average daily minutes and overutilized minutes. Linear regression quantified significance for all primary and secondary analyses.Methods  In the regressions, monthly average minutes showed no significant difference in July (P = .65) compared to the baseline month of April. There were no significant differences for any month for overutilized minutes or 80th percentile number ORs working at 7:00 pm. Only August was significant (P = .005) for mean last room end time.Results  Data from a single institution study did not show a “July Phenomenon” in the number of operating minutes, overutilized minutes, or the number of ORs working late in July.Conclusions


2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1281-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa L. Kirkwood ◽  
Khalil Chamseddin ◽  
Gary M. Arbique ◽  
Jeffrey B. Guild ◽  
David Timaran ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document