scholarly journals P24.06 Real World use of Cisplatin and Carboplatin Based Therapy in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM)

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. S379-S380
Author(s):  
S. Cedres ◽  
J.D. Assaf ◽  
P. Iranzo ◽  
A. Callejo ◽  
N. Pardo ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v752
Author(s):  
S. Cedres ◽  
J.D. Assaf ◽  
P. Iranzo ◽  
A. Callejo ◽  
N. Pardo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Roger Y. Kim ◽  
Nandita Mitra ◽  
Stephen J. Bagley ◽  
Melina E. Marmarelis ◽  
Andrew R. Haas ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8554-8554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie Glass Zauderer ◽  
Anne S. Tsao ◽  
Dean A Fennell ◽  
William Bruce Wong ◽  
Thirupathi Pattipaka ◽  
...  

8554 Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but aggressive cancer, which may be challenging to diagnose. The standard of care for MPM is cisplatin plus pemetrexed. In the recent phase III MAPS trial, addition of bevacizumab provided a significant survival benefit. There is limited data on real-world MPM treatment patterns to provide context to trial results. Consequently, the present study was conducted to evaluate treatment and referral patterns, co-morbidities and resource use in patients with MPM in the U.S. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with a diagnosis of MPM between Jan 2004 and September 2015 were identified from the MarketScan claims database. Patients were required to have data for 12 months prior, and at least 3 months post, the diagnosis index date. Patients with other (non-MPM) cancers, malignant mesothelioma of non-pleural origin and those enrolled in clinical trials were excluded from the analysis. Treatment and resource utilization were identified by their corresponding HCPCS and DRG codes. Referral patterns were estimated starting from the first lung-related visit during the year preceding MPM diagnosis. Results: In the cohort of 1,869 patients, the median age was 71 years (range 61–79) and 65% were male. 4.1% of patients underwent radical surgery and of the remaining 96%, 15.6% had first-line chemotherapy, 33.2% had first-line chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, 11.7% received radiotherapy, and 39.5% received no chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The most common diagnosis on the first lung-related visit was pleural effusion (16.5%), followed by chest pain (10.7%), shortness of breath (9.6%) and cough (8.5%). The median time from first lung-related visit to MPM diagnosis was 77 days (mean 134 days, IQR 23–258). Conclusions: This real-world analysis showed that only a small proportion of MPM patients (~4%) received radical surgery and a large number of patients did not receive any treatment at all, indicating a large unmet need for effective treatments in this disease area. Additionally, the pathway to MPM diagnosis may be challenging in this population with a poor prognosis, often involving multiple healthcare contacts over an extended period of time.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20562-e20562
Author(s):  
Abdullah Nasser ◽  
Andrew Baird ◽  
Mathieu D. Saint-Pierre ◽  
Scott A. Laurie ◽  
Paul Wheatley-Price

e20562 Background: Two mesothelioma prognostic models have been suggested: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Cancer and Leukaemia Group B (CALGB) models. Both were based on clinical trial patients enrolled in the mid-1980s to early-1990s. Several changes to mesothelioma management have been adopted since publication of these models, including improved surgical and palliative interventions and changes to systemic therapy. Methods: With ethics approval, we collected and analyzed the health data of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis treated at our institution between January 1991 and March 2019. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Univariate analysis was used to identify significant predictors of survival, which were then used to construct a multivariate survival tree with complete case-analysis and bootstrapping. Patients were then stratified into three prognostic groups based on their median OS. Results: 337 patients were included in the study; 309 (91.7%) were dead at last follow-up. The median OS was 9.4 (8.1-11.5) months for the entire population. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), histology, white blood count, platelets, International Mesothelioma Interest Group stage, age and hemoglobin were independent predictors of survival. The final pruned survival tree was based on 285 patients and incorporated the first five predictors. Good, intermediate and poor prognostic groups had median OS of > 12 months, 6-12 months, and < 6 months, respectively. Factors associated with the prognostic groups were: good prognosis: ECOG 0-1, normal platelets, stage 1, 2 and epithelioid histology; intermediate prognosis: ECOG 0-1 with either stage 3, 4 and/or sarcomatoid or biphasic histology; poor prognosis: ECOG 2-4 regardless of other factors. Conclusions: In contrast to EORTC/CALGB, real world evidence generates these prognostic groups with face validity but will need independent validation. Our data does not account for recent advances including immunotherapy, and thus patients with non-epithelioid histology may have better survival than predicted.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document