MP57-10 RISK FACTORS FOR MAJOR COMPLICATIONS AND PERIOPERATIVE MORTALITY FOLLOWING SURGICAL RESECTION OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA WITH UPPER LEVEL IVC THROMBUS: A CONTEMPORARY MULTI-CENTER EXPERIENCE

2014 ◽  
Vol 191 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jason Abel ◽  
R Houston Thompson ◽  
Vitaly Margulis ◽  
Jennifer E. Heckman ◽  
Megan M. Merrill ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16112-e16112
Author(s):  
I. Alex Bowman ◽  
Alana Christie ◽  
Tri Cao Le ◽  
Alisha Bent ◽  
James Brugarolas

e16112 Background: Brain metastases (BM) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have historically been associated with a poor prognosis. We have previously reported improved outcomes for RCC patients diagnosed with brain metastases prior to or during 1st line systemic therapy among patients treated with modern systemic and local therapies. Here we report outcomes in all mRCC patients regardless of the timing of BM diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective database of mRCC patients treated at our institution between 2006 and 2015 was compiled and patients with BM identified. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method from the diagnosis of metastatic RCC, according to BM status and by IMDC risk group. Results: 271 patients with mRCC were identified, including 79 (29.2 %) diagnosed with BM. Clear-cell histology was more common among BM (94.2 v 81.0%, p = 0.01), otherwise patient characteristics were similar. BM were diagnosed prior to systemic therapy (44.3%), or after one or more lines of therapy (one 26.6%, two 13.9%, three 5.1%, four 6.3%, five 3.8%). Among BM patients, 54 (68.4%) received local therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and/or surgical resection, 14 (17.7%) received WBRT alone, and 11 (13.9%) had no CNS-directed treatment. Local therapy consisted of SRS in 43 (54.4%) and surgical resection in 18 (22.8%), with some patients receiving both. Medial OS from metastatic diagnosis for those with BM was not significantly different from those without BM (26.4 v 28.7 mo, p = 0.305). This remained true when analyzed according to IMDC risk factors (see table). Conclusions: OS from the diagnosis of metastatic RCC did not significantly differ with or without BM in a cohort treated with modern systemic and CNS-directed therapies regardless of the timing of BM diagnosis or presence of IMDC risk factors. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanqing Ma ◽  
Weijun Ma ◽  
Xiren Xu ◽  
Zheng Guan ◽  
Peipei Pang

AbstractThis study aimed to construct convention-radiomics CT nomogram containing conventional CT characteristics and radiomics signature for distinguishing fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fp-AML) from clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). 29 fp-AML and 110 ccRCC patients were enrolled and underwent CT examinations in this study. The radiomics-only logistic model was constructed with selected radiomics features by the analysis of variance (ANOVA)/Mann–Whitney (MW), correlation analysis, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and the radiomics score (rad-score) was computed. The convention-radiomics logistic model based on independent conventional CT risk factors and rad-score was constructed for differentiating. Then the relevant nomogram was developed. Receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to quantify the accuracy for distinguishing. The rad-score of ccRCC was smaller than that of fp-AML. The convention-radioimics logistic model was constructed containing variables of enhancement pattern, VUP, and rad-score. To the entire cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) of convention-radiomics model (0.968 [95% CI 0.923–0.990]) was higher than that of radiomics-only model (0.958 [95% CI 0.910–0.985]). Our study indicated that convention-radiomics CT nomogram including conventional CT risk factors and radiomics signature exhibited better performance in distinguishing fp-AML from ccRCC.


Urology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 354-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichi Ito ◽  
Hayakazu Nakazawa ◽  
Ken Marumo ◽  
Seiichiro Ozono ◽  
Tatsuo Igarashi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Ahmed Nagy ◽  
Mona Kamal ◽  
Hesham El Halawani

Background: Renal cell carcinoma is a rare tumor and till recently few treatment options were available. It is poorly understood why people develop RCC since only a few etiologic factors have been clinically identified as risk factors for RCC.Purpose: To analyze our experience at Ain Shams University Clinical Oncology department in Egypt with patients presenting with advanced renal cell carcinoma to provide a correlations between clinic-pathological factors, treatment and survival outcomes.Methodology: Retrospective review of the data of 54 patients who were diagnosed as RCC and presented to Ain Shams University Clinical Oncology department in Egypt from 1 May 2013 till 1 May 2015. Descriptive and clinic-pathological data were described using simple and relative frequencies. Survival outcome for the patients will be described using Kaplan Meier curves stratified according to morphology, age group and treatment received.Results: The sample included 54 patients (53.7% were males) of whom 14.3% were less than 40 years and 3.7% were elderly (≥ 70 years old). The median age was 55.5 years (SD ± 13.6 , range 19-71). Median PFS was 6.5 months (SD ± 12.3846 Range 43) while the median OS was 13 months (SD ± 12.161 Range 46). PFS in patients aged below 55.5 years was 9 months (95% CI=6.509-11.491) compared to 4 months (95% CI=2.704-5.296) in older patients (p = .004). PFS in patients who achieved PR after sunitinb was 17 months (95% CI=6.916-27.084) compared to 5 months (95% CI=3.699-6.301) in patients who didn’t achieved PR (p < .001). OS in patients aged below 55.5 years was 15 months (95% CI=9.131-20.869) compared to 11 months (95% CI=8.947-13.053) in older patients (p = .012). Favorable pathology status was associated with prolonged OS of 14 months (95% CI= 9.403-18.597) versus 11 months (95% CI=8.363-13.637) for unfavourable pathology status (p = .11). Low grades histopathogy was associated with prolonged OS of 44 months (95% CI= 38.456-49.544) versus 12 months (95% CI=10.077-13.923) for higher grades (p = < .001).Conclusion: Multivariate analyses supported a conclusion that younger age was an independent prognostic factor for survival along with other known risk factors such as tumor grade and pathology status.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document