scholarly journals Patients Preferences for Long-Term Treatment After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and Analytic Hierarchy Process

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. A534
Author(s):  
A.C. Mühlbacher ◽  
S. Bethge ◽  
A. Kaczynski ◽  
C. Juhnke
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel C. Mühlbacher ◽  
Susanne Bethge ◽  
Anika Kaczynski

Background: Cardiovascular disease is one of the most common causes of death worldwide, with many individuals having experienced acute coronary syndrome (ACS). How patients with a history of ACS value aspects of their medical treatment have been evaluated rarely. The aim of this study was to determine patient priorities for long-term drug therapy after experiencing ACS.Methods: To identify patient-relevant treatment characteristics, a systematic literature review and qualitative patient interviews were conducted. A questionnaire was developed to elicit patient's priorities for different characteristics of ACS treatment using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). To evaluate the patient-relevant outcomes, the eigenvector method was applied.Results: Six-hundred twenty-three patients participated in the computer-assisted personal interviews and were included in the final analysis. Patients showed a clear priority for the attribute “reduction of mortality risk” (weight: 0.402). The second most preferred attribute was the “prevention of a new myocardial infarction” (weight: 0.272), followed by “side effect: dyspnea” (weight: 0.165) and “side effect: bleeding” (weight: 0.117). The “frequency of intake” was the least important attribute (weight: 0.044).Conclusion: In conclusion, this study shows that patients strongly value a reduction of the mortality risk in post-ACS treatment. Formal consideration of patient preferences and priorities can help to inform a patient-centered approach, clinical practice, development of future effective therapies, and health policy for decision makers that best represents the needs and goals of the patient.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. 129-141
Author(s):  
Axel C. Mühlbacher ◽  
Anika Kaczynski ◽  
Katharina Schmidt ◽  
Charalabos-Markos Dintsios

ZusammenfassungVerfahren der multikriteriellen Entscheidungsanalyse erlauben die Bewertung und Saldierung von Nutzen und Schaden unter der Berücksichtigung von Präferenzen. Im Gesundheitswesen können beispielsweise die Patienten- oder Expertenpräferenzen in Bezug auf verschiedene Nutzen-, Schaden- oder Anwendungsaspekte einer Gesundheitstechnologie im Entscheidungsprozess berücksichtigt werden. Mögliche Ansätze zur Abwägung von Nutzen und Schaden einer Gesundheitstechnologie bieten Methoden wie der Analytic Hierarchy Process oder das Discrete Choice Experiment. Diese und andere Methoden erlauben den Vergleich einzelner Alternativen auf Basis des Gesamtnutzens. Dabei werden verschiedenen Zielkriterien numerische Teilnutzenwerte zugewiesen, welche in ein Gesamtmaß des Nutzens überführt werden, um so den direkten Vergleich der unterschiedlichen Handlungsoptionen zu ermöglichen.


Angiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 547-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria E. Tsoumani ◽  
Kallirroi I. Kalantzi ◽  
Andromachi A. Dimitriou ◽  
Ioannis V. Ntalas ◽  
Ioannis A. Goudevenos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gennaro Ratti ◽  
Antonio Maglione ◽  
Emilia Biglietto ◽  
Cinzia Monda ◽  
Ciro Elettrico ◽  
...  

Long term treatment with ticagrelor 60 mg and low-dose aspirin are indicated after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We retrospectively reviewed aggregate data of 187 patients (155 M and 38 F) (mean age 63.8±9 years) in follow up after ACS with at least one high risk condition (Multivessel disease, diabetes, GFR<60 mL/min, history of prior myocardial infarction, age >65 years) treated with ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily (after 90 mg twice daily for 12 months). The results were compared with findings (characteristics of the patients at baseline, outcomes, bleeding) of PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial and Eu Label. The highrisk groups were represented as follows: multivessel disease 105 pts (82%), diabetes 63 pts (33%), GFR< 60 mL/min 27 pts (14%), history of prior MI 33 pts (17%), >65 year aged 85 pts (45%). Treatment was withdrawn in 7 patients: 3 cases showed atrial fibrillation and were placed on oral anticoagulant drugs, one developed intracranial bleeding, in three patients a temporary withdrawal was due to surgery (1 colon polyposis and 2 cases of bladder papilloma). Chest pain without myocardial infarction occurred in 16 patients (revascularization was required in 9 patients). Dyspnea was present in 15 patients, but was not a cause for discontinuation of therapy. Long term treatment with ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg/day showed a favourable benefit/risk profile after ACS.  In this study all patients had been given ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily for 12 months and the 60 mg twice daily dosage was started immediately thereafter, unlike PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial in which it was prescribed within a period ranging from 1 day to 1 year after discontinuation of the 90 mg dose. This makes our results more consistent with current clinical practice. However, a careful outpatient follow-up and constant counseling are mandatory to check out compliance to therapy and adverse side effects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Soo-Kyung Shin ◽  
Young-Hoon Bae ◽  
Jun-Ho Choi

Long-term care hospitals for the elderly are places for the elderly and patients with impaired mobility to live in, but these places face a high risk of great damage in the event of a fire. The standards for fire safety at long-term care hospitals for the elderly are limited to inspection of firefighting facilities and training plans, with no index to evaluate the evacuation plans, facilities for evacuation in case of fire, and the fire response manuals of long-term care hospitals for the elderly. Therefore, this study tries to carry out a basic analysis and establish fire safety evaluation indices for long-term care hospitals for the elderly. To that end, the study derives the importance and priorities of the indices related to fire safety in long-term care hospitals for the elderly through an analytic hierarchy process questionnaire surveying 44 firefighting experts. Finally, considering the importance and priorities of the indices, this study presents fire safety evaluation standards (drafts) for long-term care hospitals for the elderly.


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Mega Suryandari ◽  
Achmad Wisakcono ◽  
Imma Widyawati Agustin

The purpose of this research is to know the implementation of park and ride at BekasiStation. The method of analysis in this research is the assessment of parking performance based onstandards and parking user perception with Kano-model, and the Analytic-Hierarchy-Process(AHP) to analyze the implementation of park and ride at Bekasi Station. The results show thatparking performance doesn’t meet the standard. The problem of parking performance at BekasiStation are view from two perspectives, namely: the peak accumulation which is more than itscapacity and parking index which is more than 1 (one). Improved performance based on userperception parking with Kano Model, the main priority is obvious parking lines and the parkingstandard. The priority of implemention of park and ride at Bekasi Station is provideparking28.48%. From the results of this research, the writter recommends to build a parking in conformitywith the parking user’s perception for short term solution and the implementation of park and ridefor the long term solution.


2020 ◽  
pp. 14-25
Author(s):  
N.V. Litvinyuk ◽  
◽  
G.V. Matyushin ◽  
A.V. Protopopov ◽  
E.V. Samohvalov ◽  
...  

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the gold standard of treating patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The results of major clinical trials on ACS patients’ treatment are reflected in modern guidelines, where PPCI is of high evidence level and is superior to conservative therapy in long-term treatment results. Treatment of elderly patients over 75 years old is carried due to modern clinical guidelines, even though few patients of this age group are included in the studies. The increase in population average life expectancy causes the increase in number of elderly ACS patients with comorbid pathology. In its turn, it affects both the choice of treatment tactics and PPCI volume. Therefore, a study of this age group is required. The present review reflects the main clinical studies and analysis of elderly patients’ treatment


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document