The development of a real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assay using TaqMan technology for the pan detection of bluetongue virus (BTV)

2017 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Mulholland ◽  
Michael J. McMenamy ◽  
Bernd Hoffmann ◽  
Bernadette Earley ◽  
Bryan Markey ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoli L. Pang ◽  
Bonita Lee ◽  
Nasim Boroumand ◽  
Barbara Leblanc ◽  
Jutta K. Preiksaitis ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott M. Reid ◽  
Katja Ebert ◽  
Katarzyna Bachanek-Bankowska ◽  
Carrie Batten ◽  
Anna Sanders ◽  
...  

Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective control of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). The present report describes the practical steps undertaken to deploy a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) to process the samples received during the outbreaks of FMD in the United Kingdom in 2007. Two independent real-time RT-PCR assays targeting different regions (5′UTR and 3D) of the FMD virus (FMDV) genome were used to confirm the presence of FMDV in clinical samples collected from the first infected premises. Once the FMDV strain responsible had been sequenced, a single real-time RT-PCR assay (3D) was selected to test a total of 3,216 samples, including material from all 8 infected premises. Using a 96-well automated system to prepare nucleic acid template, up to 84 samples could be processed within 5 hr of submission, and up to 269 samples were tested per working day. A conservative cut-off was used to designate positive samples, giving rise to an assay specificity of 99.9% or 100% for negative control material or samples collected from negative premises, respectively. For the first time, real-time RT-PCR results were used to recognize preclinical FMD in a cattle herd. Furthermore, during the later stages of the outbreaks, the real-time RT-PCR assay supported an active surveillance program within high-risk cattle herds. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first documented use of real-time RT-PCR as a principal laboratory diagnostic tool following introduction of FMD into a country that was FMD-free (without vaccination) and highlights the advantages of this assay to support control decisions during disease outbreaks.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9553-9553
Author(s):  
J. Liu ◽  
K. Qu ◽  
C. Chai ◽  
H. Li ◽  
A. Sferruzza ◽  
...  

9553 Background: Synovial sarcoma is the most common non-rhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcoma in children and adolescents. A specific translocation, t(X;18), induces fusion of the SYT gene on chromosome 18 to an SSX gene on chromosome X. The resulting fusion gene consists of at least 2 subtypes with different breakpoints: SYT-SSX1(X;18)(p11.23;q11.2) and SYT-SSX2 (X;18)(p11.21;q11.2). Because t(X;18) transcripts occur in >90% of synovial sarcoma subtypes, this marker may be useful for diagnosis. We evaluated the accuracy of a multiplex real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for detection of the primary SYT-SSX fusion transcript types in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and frozen tissues. Methods: 17 tumors (7 synovial sarcomas, 4 Ewing’s sarcomas, 5 rhabdomyosarcomas, 1 small round blue-cell tumor), 4 normal tissues, and 4 control samples were tested for SYT-SSX translocations using real-time RT-PCR. Results were compared to those obtained with gel electrophoresis detection of amplified transcripts; discrepant results were confirmed by sequencing. Results: Concordance between real time RT-PCR and gel electrophoresis was 100% (25/25) for internal control genes and SYT-SSX1, and 92% (23/25) for SYT-SSX2. Of the 2 samples with discordant SYT-SSX2 results, 1 was positive by real-time RT-PCR but not gel electrophoresis and 1 was positive by electrophoresis but not real-time RT-PCR; in both cases, DNA sequencing confirmed the real-time RT-PCR results. The minimum percentage of tumor to normal cells required for detection of SYT-SSX fusion transcripts by real-time RT-PCR was 6.25%. Conclusions: This real-time RT-PCR assay appears to provide greater accuracy than gel electrophoresis for identification of SYT-SSX translocation and fusion types. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 485-486
Author(s):  
Sabarinath B. Nair ◽  
Christodoulos Pipinikas ◽  
Roger Kirby ◽  
Nick Carter ◽  
Christiane Fenske

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Chunyang Dai ◽  
Huiyan Wang ◽  
Yong Gao ◽  
Tuantuan Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, is posing a serious threat to global public health. Reverse transcriptase real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is widely used as the gold standard for clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2. Due to technical limitations, the reported positive rates of qRT-PCR assay of throat swab samples vary from 30 to 60%. Therefore, the evaluation of alternative strategies to overcome the limitations of qRT-PCR is required. A previous study reported that one-step nested (OSN)-qRT-PCR revealed better suitability for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, information on the analytical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR is insufficient. Method In this study, we aimed to analyze OSN-qRT-PCR by comparing it with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and qRT-PCR by using a dilution series of SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviral RNA and a quality assessment panel. The clinical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR was also validated and compared with ddPCR and qRT-PCR using specimens from COVID-19 patients. Result The limit of detection (copies/ml) of qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and OSN-qRT-PCR were 520.1 (95% CI: 363.23–1145.69) for ORF1ab and 528.1 (95% CI: 347.7–1248.7) for N, 401.8 (95% CI: 284.8–938.3) for ORF1ab and 336.8 (95% CI: 244.6–792.5) for N, and 194.74 (95% CI: 139.7–430.9) for ORF1ab and 189.1 (95% CI: 130.9–433.9) for N, respectively. Of the 34 clinical samples from COVID-19 patients, the positive rates of OSN-qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and qRT-PCR were 82.35% (28/34), 67.65% (23/34), and 58.82% (20/34), respectively. Conclusion In conclusion, the highly sensitive and specific OSN-qRT-PCR assay is superior to ddPCR and qRT-PCR assays, showing great potential as a technique for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with low viral loads.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document