scholarly journals Disparities of Health Care Access Among Hispanics At Risk of Lower Extremity Amputation

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. e209
Author(s):  
Tze-Woei (Kevin) Tan ◽  
Diego Urbina ◽  
Chiu-Hsieh Hsu ◽  
David G. Armstrong ◽  
David Marrero ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine R. Butler ◽  
Margaret L. Schwarze ◽  
Ronit Katz ◽  
Susan M. Hailpern ◽  
William Kreuter ◽  
...  

BackgroundLower extremity amputation is common among patients with ESRD, and often portends a poor prognosis. However, little is known about end-of-life care among patients with ESRD who undergo amputation.MethodsWe conducted a mortality follow-back study of Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD who died in 2002 through 2014 to analyze patterns of lower extremity amputation in the last year of life compared with a parallel cohort of beneficiaries without ESRD. We also examined the relationship between amputation and end-of-life care among the patients with ESRD.ResultsOverall, 8% of 754,777 beneficiaries with ESRD underwent at least one lower extremity amputation in their last year of life compared with 1% of 958,412 beneficiaries without ESRD. Adjusted analyses of patients with ESRD showed that those who had undergone lower extremity amputation were substantially more likely than those who had not to have been admitted to—and to have had prolonged stays in—acute and subacute care settings during their final year of life. Amputation was also associated with a greater likelihood of dying in the hospital, dialysis discontinuation before death, and less time receiving hospice services.ConclusionsNearly one in ten patients with ESRD undergoes lower extremity amputation in their last year of life. These patients have prolonged stays in acute and subacute health care settings and appear to have limited access to hospice services. These findings likely signal unmet palliative care needs among seriously ill patients with ESRD who undergo amputation as well as opportunities to improve their care.


1999 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 312-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
RD Sowell ◽  
WB Mangel ◽  
CJ Kilczewski ◽  
JM Normington

The purpose of this study was to determine whether Medicare patients at risk for lower-extremity amputation due to complications from diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and/or gangrene who receive the services classified under Level II code M0101 of the Health Care Financing Administration's Common Procedure Coding System (cutting or removal of corns, calluses, and/or trimming of nails, application of skin creams and other hygienic and preventive maintenance care) have lower rates of lower-extremity amputation than those who do not receive such services. Analysis of the data suggests that those at-risk beneficiaries who received these services were nearly four times less likely to experience lower-extremity amputation than those who did not receive such services. The study has both methodologic limitations (the study considers only one variable, receipt or nonreceipt of certain types of podiatric medical care, while other variables may affect rates of lower-extremity amputation) and technological limitations (attempts to link the 2 years of per case Medicare Part B data were unsuccessful, limiting the length of the study to 1 year). Further research on this topic is encouraged.


2009 ◽  
Vol 99 (S1) ◽  
pp. S187-S192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carey V. Johnson ◽  
Matthew J. Mimiaga ◽  
Sari L. Reisner ◽  
Ashley M. Tetu ◽  
Kevin Cranston ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey H. Garrison ◽  
Besagarahally Shankara ◽  
Michael J. Mueller

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Judith Lynam ◽  
Christine Loock ◽  
Lorine Scott ◽  
Sabrina M. Wong ◽  
Valerie Munroe ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 84 (7) ◽  
pp. 322-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
LJ Sanders

Fifteen percent of individuals with diabetes will likely develop foot ulcers in their lifetime, and approximately 15% to 20% of these ulcers are estimated to result in lower extremity amputation. Techniques to prevent lower extremity amputation range from the simple but often neglected foot inspection to complicated vascular and reconstructive foot surgery. Appropriate management can prevent and heal diabetic foot ulcers, thereby greatly decreasing the amputation rate and medical care costs. Prevention is the key to treatment. The author discusses general guidelines for foot screening and identifies three specific goals for prevention of amputation: 1) identification of at risk individuals needing prevention and the specific factors placing them at risk; 2) protection of the foot against the adverse effects of external forces (pressure, friction, and shear); and 3) reduction of the incidence of diabetic foot ulcers through educational programs.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4980-4980
Author(s):  
Mohammed Abdullah Alsheef ◽  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Marco Donadini ◽  
Abdul Rehman Z. Zaidi

Patients undergoing lower extremity amputation (LEA) are at risk of developing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), but no generally accepted prevention guidelines exist. This systematic review aimed at understanding the incidence of VTE with or without thromboprophylaxis in adult patients with major lower extremity amputation (LEA). Primary outcomes were onset of DVT, PE, or mortality. Secondary outcomes were any major adverse events due to treatment. We searched English language full-text papers in multiple databases using keywords, including amputation/adverse effects, amputation/complications, venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. Twenty-eight studies providing observations for 4,841 patients were selected. The fatal PE risk was 2.6% without prophylaxis and significantly decreased to a non-zero residual risk of 0.9% with VTE prophylaxis. Above-knee amputees were at greatest risk of VTE and subsequent complications. The risk was not confined to the amputated stump and can involve the contralateral limb. The role of compression ultrasonography screening in asymptomatic patients remains controversial in various populations at risk for VTE. All patients undergoing major LEA should be considered at high risk for the development of VTE, even after discharge from hospital. We recommend prophylactic anticoagulation (if not contraindicated) and clinical surveillance in all patients undergoing LEA and further studies to determine the optimal prophylactic strategy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document