Constructions and image-schema preservation. A historical-comparative analysis of PAY in Greek and English

Lingua ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 85-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Ioannou
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Image Schema ◽  
Historical Comparative

scholarly journals Choledochal Cysts Surgical Management: Retrospective and Historical Comparative Analysis

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S937
Author(s):  
P. Pastor Peinado ◽  
J. Ocaña Jiménez ◽  
P. Muñoz ◽  
J.M. Fernández-Cebrián ◽  
J. Nuño
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Choledochal Cysts ◽  
Historical Comparative

Huligānisms vēsturiskā skatījumā

2021 ◽  
pp. 289-299
Author(s):  
Jana Zīle
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Theoretical Analysis ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Examination Method ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Public Recreation

One of the oldest and most dangerous criminal offences is hooliganism, i.e. an unlawful offence with intention to violate a public order, disrupt the peace of inhabitants or create a disorder. Disturbers of public recreation, as well as those who commit offences against other people are often referred to as hooligans in social life. Today, hooliganism is still considered as one of the most common types of criminal offences, although the number of these offences tend to decrease. Considering the legal issues related to hooliganism as important and topical, I have chosen this subject for this article. The publication will deal with the following issues: the criminal judicial understanding of the concept ‘hooliganism’; the types of hooliganism – petty hooliganism as an administrative violation, criminally punishable hooliganism; as well as the prevention of hooliganism – general and special. The methodological basis of the research is composed of a dialectic method of scientific examination, method of general theoretical analysis (analysis, synthesis, abstraction, induction, deduction) and individual scientific (special) methods such as historical, comparative analysis.

scholarly journals Soviet repressions against the clergy and believers of the Dnepropetrovsk region in 1939–1942

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Oleh Boiko
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Initial Period ◽  
Religious Groups ◽  
Soviet Leadership ◽  
Archival Documents ◽  
Long Time ◽  
History Of ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Further Development

The study is carried out in line with general problems of the history of state- church relations in the conditions of the Soviet totalitarian system. For a long time modern historiography did not pay proper attention to anti-religious politics in the USSR in 1939–1941, both at general and regional levels. Most scholars avoided themes related to repressive policy regarding worshipers in the years following the Great Terror, and some even noted the liberalization of the course of the Soviet leadership in the field of religion and church on the eve of the German-Soviet war, which began in June 1941. The purpose of the study is to highlight political repressions against the clergy and believers of various Christian denominations in Dnipropetrovsk region in 1939–1942. Research methods: problem-chronological, historical-genetic, historical-comparative, analysis, synthesis. The main results of the work. The process of preparation and further implementation of repressions of the clergy and active believers of various religious groups of Dnipropetrovsk region in 1939–1942 is highlighted. Dozens of convicted worshipers and “sectarians” are identified by name. Nature of accusations and peculiarities of imposed sentences are determined. The course of collective cases fabricated by the NKVD bodies against the Orthodox clergy is shown. Repressive measures of the authorities in the initial period of the German-Soviet war are analyzed. The continuity of the state anti-religious course and the use of terror until 1942 is proved. The originality of the work is in the use and analysis of numerous previously unknown archival documents which helped to disclose the formulated scientific problem. Practical value: despite the regional limitations of the study, the materials of the article are useful not only to local historians, but also to church historians for further development of the problems in the outlined chronological framework. Type of article: analytical.

scholarly journals Collectivist Logic in Comparative Genocide Studies and in the Battles for Memory

2020 ◽  
pp. 39-60
Author(s):  
Lech M. Nijakowski
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Animal Rights ◽  
Symbolic Capital ◽  
Collective Guilt ◽  
Politics Of Memory ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Genocide Studies ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
The Relationship

The article aims to present the mechanisms of collectivist logic as it functions in three areas: (1) in the historical comparative analysis of genocides – the basic method of genocidestudies; (2) in the activities of the organizations of victims and survivors, as well as in actions undertaken by animal rights activists; (3) in nationalist discourses and in the politics of memory. Collectivist logic is a set of operations that address human communities – groups of individuals linked together by significant social bonds and interests, and perceived as culturally distinctive – as the subject of history. As a result of the application of such logic, we may think about collective guilt and collective merit. The article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of historical comparative analysis as an essential methodological tool of genocide studies. The argument further focuses upon the use of the symbolic capital attributed to the term “genocide” in studies involving analyses comparing other crimes – as well as the industrial exploitation of animals – to genocides. Finally, the author describes the relationship between the state policy of memory, nationalist discourses, and the academic integrity of genocide scholars.

scholarly journals Remote Work of Academic Employees: Rule vs. Exception?

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 8-12
Author(s):  
Maria V. Zakharova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Quantitative Aspect ◽  
Remote Work ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
The Road ◽  
General Law ◽  
Historical Comparative

Purpose. To analyze the prospects of the introduction of remote work of academic employees into the typical employment zone. Methodology: the comparative law method will become the basic method of the presented research; it is planned to perform a comparative analysis carried out within the framework of an inter-disciplinary approach (comparison of the legal doctrine with related branches of knowledge such as sociology, economics, etc.), an inter-branch approach (a comparative analysis of approaches used in the general law theory), a trans-border approach (comparison of various national legal systems) and a chronological approach (a historical comparative analysis). Conclusions. Following the results of the research, the author has come to the following significant conclusions: 1. Remote work is a vivid manifestation of the statutory regulation with application of digital technologies. 2. Labor codes and labor laws of various countries appeared in the industrial epoch of the XX century are at the very beginning of the road towards the resolution of this problem. 3. Remote work of academic employees is more of an exception than a rule at the current stage of the development of the legal world map. 4. However, the general evolution of public relations has sped up so much in the qualitative as well as the quantitative aspect, that in the future conventional forms of classes with students may be changed, if not fully cancelled, in favor of greater digitization in its various manifestations. Scientific and practical significance. Conclusions provided in the article are of practical relevance for the development of comparative law, branch law and general theoretical legal disciplines of different countries of the world.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document