The role of genetic engineering in livestock production

2008 ◽  
Vol 113 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 191-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Blasco
1995 ◽  
Vol 1995 ◽  
pp. 73-73
Author(s):  
E. R. Deaville

The term biotechnology has been defined as the application of biological organisms, systems or processes to manufacture and service industries (Anon, 1980) and is, therefore, more than the application of ‘genetic engineering’ techniques alone. The potential application of biotechnology to the agricultural livestock industry includes many wide ranging areas: animal health; breeding; livestock production; livestock nutrition and the nutritive value of feeds. The role of biotechnology in animal nutrition and feeding is of particular importance since feed costs account for a significant proportion of the total variable costs in any livestock production system (e.g. milk, meat). The potential implications of biotechnology in animal nutrition has been reviewed by Armstrong (1986) and includes references to the improvement of the nutritive value of feeds through, for example, genetic manipulation of feed sources (cereals), appropriate supplementation and the use of biological inoculants with or without enzymes as silage additives and to improvements in the ability of the animal to obtain nutrients from feeds through the addition of enzymes to feeds and modification of rumen microbes through genetic engineering.


1985 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-526
Author(s):  
JAN S. GAVORA

Several new, powerful techniques for the manipulation of living cells and their components are globally referred to as biotechnology. They have the potential to bring about dramatic improvements in livestock production. The Symposium papers that follow review the relevant advances and consider the role of biotechnology in future animal production research. Key words: Biotechnology, animal science, genetic engineering, rumen microflora, embryo manipulation


1995 ◽  
Vol 1995 ◽  
pp. 73-73
Author(s):  
E. R. Deaville

The term biotechnology has been defined as the application of biological organisms, systems or processes to manufacture and service industries (Anon, 1980) and is, therefore, more than the application of ‘genetic engineering’ techniques alone. The potential application of biotechnology to the agricultural livestock industry includes many wide ranging areas: animal health; breeding; livestock production; livestock nutrition and the nutritive value of feeds. The role of biotechnology in animal nutrition and feeding is of particular importance since feed costs account for a significant proportion of the total variable costs in any livestock production system (e.g. milk, meat). The potential implications of biotechnology in animal nutrition has been reviewed by Armstrong (1986) and includes references to the improvement of the nutritive value of feeds through, for example, genetic manipulation of feed sources (cereals), appropriate supplementation and the use of biological inoculants with or without enzymes as silage additives and to improvements in the ability of the animal to obtain nutrients from feeds through the addition of enzymes to feeds and modification of rumen microbes through genetic engineering.


2007 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 445-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dang K. Nhan ◽  
Le T. Phong ◽  
Marc J.C. Verdegem ◽  
Le T. Duong ◽  
Roel H. Bosma ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (06) ◽  
pp. A01 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrika Olausson

In recent times we have allegedly witnessed a “post-truth” turn in society. Nonetheless, surveys show that science holds a relatively strong position among lay publics, and case studies suggest that science is part of their online discussions about environmental issues on social media — an important, yet strikingly under-researched, debate forum. Guided by social representation theory, this study aims to contribute knowledge about the role of science in everyday representations of livestock production on social media. The analysis identifies two central themata, namely lay publics' contestations of (1) facts and non-facts, and (2) factual and non-factual sources.


2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (5/6) ◽  
pp. 640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula Weisenfeld ◽  
Dirk Nissen ◽  
Kathrin Gassert
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document