Prognostic significance of low pectoralis muscle mass on preoperative chest computed tomography in localized non-small cell lung cancer after curative-intent surgery

Lung Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 71-76
Author(s):  
Changbo Sun ◽  
Masaki Anraku ◽  
Takuya Kawahara ◽  
Takahiro Karasaki ◽  
Kentaro Kitano ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Yang ◽  
Lingling Tan ◽  
Lingling Xie ◽  
Song Hu ◽  
Dan Liu ◽  
...  

BackgroundWhether muscle strength and physical performance should be components of sarcopenia remains controversial. This study evaluated the skeletal muscle index derived from computed tomography images at the 12th thoracic vertebra level (T12 SMI), handgrip strength, performance status, and their combination for predicting overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.MethodsChest computed tomography, handgrip strength measurement, and bioelectrical impedance analysis were performed. Sarcopenia was defined based on the T12 SMI alone or the T12 SMI, handgrip, and/or physical performance (i.e. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia [AWGS]-defined sarcopenia or severe sarcopenia).ResultsOverall, 639 participants were included; 488 (76.4%) died. At baseline, 160 (25.0%), 141 (22.1%), and 42 (6.6%) patients had computed tomography-defined sarcopenia, AWGS-defined sarcopenia, and AWGS-defined severe sarcopenia, respectively. Chest computed tomography-defined sarcopenia (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.43), AWGS-defined sarcopenia (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.59-2.49), and AWGS-defined severe sarcopenia (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 2.21-4.09) were more strongly associated with poor prognosis than a performance status score ≥2 (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.73).ConclusionsAdding handgrip strength and the performance status score to chest computed tomography-defined sarcopenia improved its prognostic ability. Oncological sarcopenia research should focus on muscle mass, strength, and function.


1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 1359-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
C A Griffin ◽  
C Lu ◽  
E K Fishman ◽  
N Khouri ◽  
M Markman ◽  
...  

Despite the wide application of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis and management of lung cancer, the role of this diagnostic modality in the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCC) has not yet been defined. We therefore compared information gained from routine chest radiography (CXR) and CT scans performed on 32 patients with SCC who were treated on an intensive chemotherapy-radiotherapy protocol. Seventy-nine pairs of CXRs and CT scans were retrospectively reviewed. We found that although CT delineates a greater extent of intrathoracic disease in each of nine anatomic areas evaluated than does CXR, agreement between CT and CXR was significant for all areas except the pericardium. Pericardial thickening was seen only on CT scan and is more frequent in SCC patients than has previously been appreciated, but both its etiology and prognostic significance are unclear at this time. CT also allowed interpretation of disease status in cases where radiation-induced fibrosis made interpretation of the CXR impossible. We do not recommend routine use of chest CT at time of diagnosis of SCC, but we recommend that its use be reserved for evaluation of new symptoms or suspected relapse, or when radiation fibrosis on CXR is severe.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document