Salt-structural styles and kinematic evolution of the Jequitinhonha deepwater fold belt, central Brazil passive margin

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Adam ◽  
Zhiyuan Ge ◽  
Marianela Sanchez
Author(s):  
Alexandre Uhlein ◽  
Marco Antônio Fonseca ◽  
Hildor José Seer ◽  
Marcel Auguste Dardenne

A Faixa neoproterozóica de dobramentos e empurrões Brasília é uma das unidades tectônicas do Brasil Central. Uma análiseestrutural e tectônica da Faixa Brasília é aqui apresentada, com dois domínios estruturais: (1) interno, com unidades alóctones, foliação Spsubhorizontal ou suavemente dobrada e médio a alto grau de metamorfismo. (2) domínio externo, com estrutura de dobras e empurrões,predomínio de foliação Sp e médio a baixo grau de metamorfismo. A leste da Faixa Brasília ocorre o domínio cratônico (Craton do São Francisco), com unidades autóctones, suavemente dobradas. A vergência das dobras e empurrões é, geralmente, para o Cráton do SãoFrancisco. O encurtamento na cobertura é balanceado por zonas de cisalhamento, amplas dobras, falhas de empurrão e inversas e falhastranscorrentes. O estilo da deformação varia com o nível crustal. Assim, no domínio externo da faixa, predomina um estilo thin-skinned,enquanto que no domínio interno, aparecem zonas de deformação dúcteis mais intensas e largas, com metamorfismo mais alto (estilothick-skinned). O segmento sul da Faixa Brasília está mais deformado e provavelmente representa o resultado de uma colisão diacrônica,mais antiga, em relação ao setor setentrional. A mega inflexão dos Pirineus e a zona de superposição pode ser o resultado da interferênciaentre duas faixas neoproterozóicas distintas, com transporte tectônico local de Norte para o Sul.Palavras chave: Faixa móvel neoproterozóica Brasília; estilo nstrutural; evolução geodinâmica. ABSTRACTTECTONICS OF THE BRASÍLIA FOLD BELT: THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN PARTS - The Neoproterozoic (ca. 650-580) Ma Brasíliafold-and-thrust-belt is a major tectonic unit in Central Brazil and can be divided into two structural domains (internal and external). In theinternal domain, most surface rocks consist of allochthonous units in a higher metamorphic grade displaying low dipping cleavage,asymmetrical folds and thrusts with significant stratigraphic repetition. The external domain is a typical foreland fold-and-thrust belt wheremedium to low grade metamorphic rocks prevail and present steeply dipping cleavage Sp. Towards the cratonic area (cratonic domain),most lithostratigraphic units are authoctonous with vertical open folds and slaty cleavage. The general vergence of folds and thrust faults inboth domains is towards the east (São Francisco Craton). Shortening of cover across the fold belt is almost always balanced by coverbasementdetachments, fold-and-thrust structures and also by NE or NW trending wrench faults. The style of deformation variesconsiderably across strike due to crustal level. Typical thin-skinned fault-fold morphology in external domain gives rise downwards to morepervasive wide zones of ductile deformation at high metamorphic grades (thick-skinned structures) in the internal domain. The Southernpart of the Brasilia belt has a more complex deformational history than the northern one. This is probably due to structural overprintcaused by a diachronic collision. The Pirineus Inflection, where local vergence is towards the South, may represent the interference zonebetween the the two parts.Keywords: Neoproterozoic Brasília fold-and-thrust belt; structural style; Geodinamic evolution.


2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 67-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio Martins Pimentel

ABSTRACT: The Brasília Belt is one of the most complete Neoproterozoic orogens in western Gondwana. Rapid progress on the understanding of the tectonic evolution of the belt was achieved due to new U-Pb data, combined with Sm-Nd and Lu-Hf analyses. The evolution of the Brasília orogen happened over a long period of time (900 - 600 Ma) involving subduction, magmatism and terrain accretion, as a result of the consumption of the Goiás oceanic lithosphere. Provenance studies, based on U-Pb zircon data, indicate that the sedimentary rock units record different tectonic settings and stages of the evolution of the orogen. The Paranoá and Canastra groups represent passive margin sequences derived from the erosion of the São Francisco Craton. The Araxá and Ibiá groups, however, have dominant Neoproterozoic detrital zircon populations, as young as 650 Ma, suggesting derivation from the Goiás Magmatic Arc. The Goiás Magmatic Arc represents a composite arc terrain, formed by the accretion of older (ca. 0.9 - 0.8 Ga) intraoceanic island arc(s), followed by more evolved continental arcs. It extends for several thousand kilometers, from SW Goiás, through NE Brazil and into Africa. Metamorphism took place between 650 - 630 Ma reflecting final closure of the Goiás Ocean and continental collision.


2002 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. SAALMANN ◽  
F. THIEDIG

The Tertiary fold-and-thrust belt on Brøggerhalvøya is characterized by a NE-vergent pile of nine thrust sheets. The sole thrust of the pile is located in Precambrian phyllites and climbs up-section to the northeast. Four lower thrust sheets consisting predominantly of Upper Palaeozoic sediments are overlain by two thrust sheets in the central part of the stack which contain a kilometre-scale syncline and anticline. The fold is cut by juxtaposed thrusts giving rise to the formation of three structurally higher basement-dominated thrust sheets. A multiple-stage kinematic model is proposed including (1) in-sequence foreland-propagating formation of the lower thrust sheets in response to N–S subhorizontal bedding-parallel movements, (2) a change in tectonic transport to ENE and out-of-sequence thrusting and formation of the kilometre-scale fold-structure followed by (3) truncation of the kilometre-scale fold and stacking of the highest basement-dominated thrust sheets by hind-ward-propagating out-of-sequence thrusting. The strain of the thrust sheets is predominantly compressive with the exception of the structurally highest thrust sheets, reflecting a temporal change to a more transpressive regime. Thrusting was followed by (4) N–S extension and (5) W–E extension. Comparison of the structural geometry and kinematic evolution of Brøggerhalvøya with the data reported for the fold belt further south allows us to assume a coeval evolution with the fold belt. A latest Paleocene/Early Eocene age for the main phase of thrusting is suggested for the West Spitsbergen Fold-and-Thrust Belt; the main phases therefore pre-date the separation of Svalbard and Greenland due to right-lateral movements along the Hornsund Fault Zone. The fold belt's temporal evolution followed by the formation of the Forlandsundet Graben can be linked with the plate-kinematic framework in the span between latest Paleocene and Middle Eocene times.


2007 ◽  
Vol 178 (5) ◽  
pp. 343-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youssef Raddi ◽  
Lahssen Baidder ◽  
Mohamed Tahiri ◽  
André Michard

Abstract North of the Saharan cratonic domain, the Anti-Atlas mountains correspond to the foreland, external fold belt of the Variscan orogen which extends in the Meseta block to the north, and Mauritanides to the southwest. The Anti-Atlas was uplifted during the Mesozoic-Cenozoic, and display several basement culminations (“boutonnières”) amidst the folded Palaeozoic cover. Recent studies in western Anti-Atlas emphasized the basement implication in the shortening process (thick skinned structure). Hereafter we investigate the cover-basement relations in eastern Anti-Atlas south of the Ougnat culmination, based on mapping at scale 1:50,000. The Palaeozoic sequence is much thinner than in the west, and the décollement levels are less important. Flexural slip folds are concentrated along the faults (en échelon folds) and within some rhombic domains crushed between major faults (e.g. Angal-Gherghiz Lozenge), whereas other areas are monoclinal. The main shortening direction deduced from the fold axes trend is directed ~N045°E as in the Ougarta range further to SE. At a regional scale, this shortening direction interferes with a N-S trending one. A sketch map of the top of the basement makes visible a mosaic of S- to SE-ward tilted blocks. The faults between these blocks are inherited from paleofaults which formed during extensional events during the Cambrian, late Ordovician, and (mainly) Middle-Late Devonian. The paleofault array is indicative of a proximal passive margin setting at the northern border of the metacratonic domain. The fault inversion and their dominant strike-slip throw occurred during a late Variscan (Stephanian-Permian) compression event, postdating the NNW-SSE collision of the Meseta block.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Peace ◽  
Christian Schiffer ◽  
Scott Jess ◽  
Jordan Phethean

<p>The inversion of rift-related faults on passive margins through kinematic reactivation is documented globally. Such structures form an integral part in petroleum systems, provide essential constraints on the kinematic and structural evolution of rifts and passive margins, and can be used as global markers for far-field stresses. Despite the importance of inverted normal faults, the controls on their kinematic evolution, as well as existence and interactions within fault populations are often poorly constrained. Here, we present new structural interpretation and kinematic modelling of an inverted relay ramp structure located offshore Nova Scotia, Canada. This structure is imaged on the Penobscot 3D seismic reflection survey down to ~3.5 s TWTT, and is constrained by two exploration wells. We map two major normal faults that display evidence for inversion in their lower portions (reverse faulting and low-amplitude folding), below ~2.5 s TWTT, though retain a normal offset in upper sections. The wider fault population is dominated by ~ENE-WSW striking normal faults that dip both north and south, while both of the two major faults dip approximately south and are associated with antithetic and synthetic faults. This kinematic dichotomy along the major faults is important as inversion such as this may go unrecognised if seismic data does not image the full depth of a structure. To accommodate such depth-dependent inversion, if both horizons co-existed during inversion, a reduction in volume of the sedimentary package is required between the normal and reverse segments of the fault. In this study, we explore possible kinematic mechanisms to explain inversion structure and the mechanisms accommodating the volumetric changes/ or mass movements required using fault restoration and strain modelling. Our results favour a poly-phase deformation history that can be reconciled with other inversion structures on related passive-margin segments, suggesting these could be widespread processes.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document