scholarly journals Meat quality of young Nellore bulls with low and high residual feed intake

Meat Science ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 593-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Zorzi ◽  
S.F.M. Bonilha ◽  
A.C. Queiroz ◽  
R.H. Branco ◽  
T.L. Sobrinho ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 632-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Frotas dos REIS ◽  
Daiane Aparecida FAUSTO ◽  
Sergio Raposo de MEDEIROS ◽  
Pedro Veiga Rodrigues PAULINO ◽  
Sebastião de Campos VALADARES FILHO ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study aimed to evaluate feed efficiency and meat quality of 31 three-crossbred beef heifers during 84 days in a feedlot system. A 60:40 concentrate and sorghum silage ration on DM basis (ME = 2.73Mcal/kg of DM, CP = 11.90% DM) was fed ad libitum. Based on residual feed intake (RFI) calculations, the heifers were ranked in three groups of feed efficiency: High RFI (average mean = 0.776; n = 9), medium RFI (average mean = -0.010; n = 11), and low RFI (average mean = - 0.624; n = 11). High RFI heifers consumed 4.56% more DM per day than low RFI heifers (P <0.05). The ADG did not differ (P> 0.05) among RFI groups (1.40kg/day). No differences (P>0.05) were detected for digestibility of the nutrients: DM (64.00%), CP (60.01%), crude fat (72.90%), NDF (54.80%) and non-fibrous carbohydrate (NFC) (78.91%). There were no differences between low and high RFI groups for slaughter weight (475.00 vs. 479.55kg), hot carcass weight (259.09 vs. 261.44kg), Longissimus dorsi (LD) area (69.02 vs. 68.11 cm2), back-fat thickness (5.74 vs. 6.26 cm), shear force (5.45 vs. 5.19kg), sensorial traits of LD muscle, LD color (intensities L=40.47 a*=24.74 and b*=16.13) or commercial cuts yield. Low RFI heifers presented similar meat quality and carcass traits as high RFI heifers, however low RFI heifers consumed less DM (kg/d).


Author(s):  
V. Ravindran ◽  
S. Elliott

SummaryThe following trial was conducted to investigate the effects of Se source (inorganic sodium selenite (SS) versus organic use Sel-Plex® (SP; Alltech Inc, Nicholasville, KY, USA)) on the performance, feathering and meat quality of 900, one-day-old male broilers over a 42 day growing period. Pens (n = 20) were randomly assigned to either: Diet A (no Se; negative control), Diet B as for diet A plus 0.3 mg/kg SS (positive control), Diet C as for diet A plus 0.2 mg/kg SP, Diet D as for diet A plus 0.3 mg/kg SP and Diet E as for diet A plus 0.4 mg/kg SP. From day 1 to 28, significant (P < 0.05) treatment effects were seen for feed intake and FCR, with values for the negative control being higher than for the diets containing Se. The best FCR was recorded for the diet containing 0.4 mg/kg SP. Breast meat yield for birds fed the negative control were lower than those fed selenite or SP supplemented diets (P < 0.05). Feather measurements on d 14, 28 and 42 of age showed that, although scores became poorer with age (4.9 at 14 d, 4.6 at 28 d and 3.6 at 42 d), they were unaffected (P > 0.05) by dietary Se inclusion. Numeric trends in favour of SP were seen in cooking losses in meat chilled for 24 hours and seven days. Cooking losses in meat frozen for seven days were significantly influenced by Se inclusion, whereby values for birds fed 0.3 and 0.4 mg/kg SP were significantly lower than values for birds fed inorganic selenite (P < 0.05). Tissue Se concentrations were highest for the SP diets. Meat oxidation from the birds fed SP was lower than for the birds fed no Se or SS. The results demonstrated that SP may be more advantageous in improving certain variables of performance and meat quality compared to inorganic sources of Se.


Meat Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.A. Fidelis ◽  
S.F.M. Bonilha ◽  
L.O. Tedeschi ◽  
R.H. Branco ◽  
J.N.S.G. Cyrillo ◽  
...  

Meat Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 265-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justyna Horodyska ◽  
Michael Oster ◽  
Henry Reyer ◽  
Anne Maria Mullen ◽  
Peadar G. Lawlor ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 192-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Smith ◽  
N. K. Gabler ◽  
J. M. Young ◽  
W. Cai ◽  
N. J. Boddicker ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 277-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Panella-Riera ◽  
A. Velarde ◽  
A. Dalmau ◽  
E. Fàbrega ◽  
M. Font i Furnols ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document