scholarly journals Short, semi-short or long GnRH agonist treatment regimens in women ICSI candidate; which is proper in preventing premature LH surge?

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-167
Author(s):  
Popea Rezaeian ◽  
Sedighe Esmaeilzadeh ◽  
Zahra Tajali ◽  
Fateme Nadi Heidari ◽  
Masoumeh Golsorkhtabaramiri
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting-Chi Huang ◽  
Mei-Zen Huang ◽  
Kok-Min Seow ◽  
Ih-Jane Yang ◽  
Song-Po Pan ◽  
...  

AbstractUtilizing corifollitropin alfa in GnRH antagonist (GnRHant) protocol in conjunction with GnRH agonist trigger/freeze-all strategy (corifollitropin alfa/GnRHant protocol) was reported to have satisfactory outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Although lessening in gonadotropin injections, GnRHant were still needed. In addition to using corifollitropin alfa, GnRHant was replaced with an oral progestin as in progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) to further reduce the injection burden in this study. We try to investigate whether this regimen (corifollitropin alfa/PPOS protocol) could effectively reduce GnRHant injections and prevent premature LH surge in PCOS patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles. This is a retrospective cohort study recruiting 333 women with PCOS, with body weight between 50 and 70 kg, undergoing first IVF/ICSI cycle between August 2015 and July 2018. We used corifollitropin alfa/GnRHant protocol prior to Jan 2017 (n = 160), then changed to corifollitropin alfa/PPOS protocol (n = 173). All patients received corifollitropin alfa 100 μg on menstruation day 2/3 (S1). Additional rFSH was administered daily from S8. In corifollitropin alfa/GnRHant group, cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day was administered from S5 till the trigger day. In corifollitropin alfa/PPOS group, dydrogesterone 20 mg/day was given from S1 till the trigger day. GnRH agonist was used to trigger maturation of oocyte. All good quality day 5/6 embryos were frozen, and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) was performed on subsequent cycle. A comparison of clinical outcomes was made between the two protocols. The primary endpoint was the incidence of premature LH surge and none of the patients occurred. Dydrogesterone successfully replace GnRHant to block LH surge while an average of 6.8 days of GnRHant injections were needed in the corifollitropin alfa/GnRHant group. No patients suffered from ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The other clinical outcomes including additional duration/dose of daily gonadotropin administration, number of oocytes retrieved, and fertilization rate were similar between the two groups. The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate in the first FET cycle were also similar between the two groups. In women with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment, corifollitropin alfa/PPOS protocol could minimize the injections burden with comparable outcomes to corifollitropin alfa/GnRHant protocol.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Luna ◽  
T Alkon ◽  
D Cassis ◽  
C Hernandez-nieto ◽  
B Sandler

Abstract Study question Does the use of double dose of GnRH antagonists during COH in women with risk of premature LH surge alter luteinization after final oocyte maturation induction? Summary answer The use of double dose of GnRH antagonist in women with risk of premature luteinizing hormone surge dosent affect luteinization after final oocyte maturation induction. What is known already GnRH antagonists are used to prevent a premature LH surge during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. The antagonists directly inhibit gonadotrophin release within several hours through competitive binding to pituitary GnRH receptors, producing a rapid suppression of LH and FSH, with no initial flare effect. In women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) it is not uncommon that premature luteinization cannot be completely prevented using a daily dose GnRH antagonist. To date, no study has evaluated the effects of using a daily double dose of GnRH antagonists to prevent a premature LH surge and its effect on luteinization after final oocyte maturation induction. Study design, size, duration This monocentric retrospective analysis evaluated the effect on luteinization after final oocyte maturation induction in twenty women during COH who received a daily double dose of GnRH antagonists (Cetrotide 0.25 mg/mL, Merck) from January 2020 to December 2020. Participants/materials, setting, methods Women with severe DOR and history of premature luteinization during COH received a double dose of GnRH antagonist when the leading follicle reached 12–14 mm (am and pm). When two follicles reached ≥18 mm in diameter, final oocyte maturation was induced with dual trigger using Leuprolide acetate and hCG. Progesterone, estradiol, bHCG, and LH levels were measured the day after final oocyte maturation induction to assure adequate luteinization. Main results and the role of chance In total twenty women were included in the analysis. Mean age 36.8± 4.2, AMH 0.65± 0.32 ng/ml, baseline antral follicle count 4± 2.3, serum hormone levels the day of ovulation induction trigger: progesterone 0.89± 0.34 ng/ml, LH 1.6± 2.1 ng/ml, estradiol 1235 ± 1420 pg/ml. Post-surge serum hormone levels average reached adequate levels: estradiol 1645 ± 1116 pg/ml, progesterone 20.4 ±2.2 ng/ml, LH 62.66± 10.5 IU/ml and, bHCG 247±115 IU/ml. A total of 76 oocytes were retrieved (3.8± 0.8 oocytes per patient), 63.1% (48/76) MII, 22% (17/76) MI, 14% (11/76) GV. Limitations, reasons for caution The retrospective nature of the study, small sample size, and potential variability in the study center’s laboratory protocol(s) compared to other reproductive treatment centers may limit the external validity of our findings. Wider implications of the findings: The daily use of double dose of GnRH antagonists during COH offers the possibility of preventing a premature LH surge in women with DOR with high risk of early ovulation, without compromising luteinization after final oocyte maturation induction. Trial registration number NA


2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. S255
Author(s):  
M. Jinno ◽  
A. Watanabe ◽  
J. Hirohama ◽  
N. Hatakeyama ◽  
R. Hiura ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 168 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. D'Occhio ◽  
G. Sudha ◽  
D. Jillella ◽  
T. Whyte ◽  
T.E. Trigg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lh Surge ◽  

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 104-11
Author(s):  
Afsoon Zarei ◽  
Tahere Bahrami Shabahrami ◽  
Nasrin Dadras

Background: Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is among the important causes of infertility in young women. Premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge (PLS) is one of its complications. PLS can reduce the quality of oocytes and therefore decrease the success of intrauterine insemination (IUI). Letrozole, a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor, prevents LH surge. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effects of letrozole on preventing premature LH surge in clomiphene-resistant patients with PCOS undergoing IUI. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 131 patients who were developed with PCOS were selected for IUI cycle, divided into two groups randomly: control group (n=67) and letrozole group (n=64). Incidence of premature LH surge, pregnancy, abortion and ongoing pregnancy rate, endometrial thickness and number of follicles were measured in both groups. Results: No significant difference was seen between mean ages in the two groups; 11.9% of the control group and 21.9% of the letrozole group became pregnant (P =0.005); furthermore, premature LH surge was seen in 4.7% of the letrozole group and 8.9% of the control group (P =0.003). E2 and Endometrial thickness was higher in letrozole group; however, LH was significantly higher in the control group (P =0.026). Conclusion: Administration of letrozole in clomiphene-resistant patients with PCO undergoing IUI cycle can decrease the incidence of PLS. In addition, it can increase pregnancy rate significantly. Therefore, using letrozole is more reasonable in patients who have not responded to clomiphene or are hypersensitive. [GMJ.2015;4(3):104-11]


2020 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Yuya Takeshige ◽  
Tomoko Hashimoto ◽  
Koichi Kyono

Background: Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol is reported as an alternative method of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge suppression. How much dosage of chlormadinone acetate (CMA), a synthetic progestin, is appropriate treatment for this phenomenon? Methods: Retrospective case control study was performed at private assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinic in Japan. Collected data was 231 cycles in patients who underwent either PPOS protocol using 12, 6, 4, or 2 mg of CMA, groups 6C, 3C, 2C, and 1C, respectively (total, 113 cycles), or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, groups 6A, 3A, 2A, and 1A, respectively (total, 118 cycles). In the CMA group, CMA and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were administered simultaneously beginning on menstrual cycle day 3. Serum P, E2, and LH were determined on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. Occurrence of premature LH surge was compared between two groups. Pregnancy outcomes were also calculated. Results: Premature LH surge was completely suppressed in CMA groups 6C, 3C, and 2C. On the other hand, this phenomenon was detected in antagonist method groups (5.9%, 7/118). But spontaneous ovulation was not observed in any group, and clinical outcomes are equal to those of GnRH antagonist treatment. Conclusions: Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) using CMA can be an appropriate alternative progestin for PPOS protocol. Since CMA is an oral medication, this method can be easy to conduct and cost-effective compared with the antagonist method. From our observation, we suggest 4 mg/day of CMA can control the egg retrieval cycle without LH surge occurrence as in other PPOS methods.


1997 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 601-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. D'Occhio ◽  
G. Sudha ◽  
D. Jillella ◽  
T. Whyte ◽  
L.J. Maclellan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lh Surge ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document