scholarly journals Immersive simulation training: Comparing the impact on midwifery and paramedic students’ confidence to perform basic life support skills

Midwifery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 102717
Author(s):  
Rory McKelvin ◽  
Giliane McKelvin
2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 999-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samar Toubasi ◽  
Mohammed R. Alosta ◽  
Muhammad W. Darawad ◽  
Waddah Demeh

Author(s):  
Asbjørn Børch Hasselager ◽  
Torsten Lauritsen ◽  
Tim Kristensen ◽  
Cathrine Bohnstedt ◽  
Claus Sønderskov ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 230-230
Author(s):  
A. M. González ◽  
M. A. Ballesteros ◽  
F. Merino ◽  
R. Abajas ◽  
S. González ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 203 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Demet Tok ◽  
Gönül Tezcan Keles ◽  
Taner Tasyüz ◽  
Emin Alp Yentür ◽  
Verda Toprak

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 163-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Johnson ◽  
Amanda Peat ◽  
Leanne Boyd ◽  
Tanya Warren ◽  
Kathryn Eastwood ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-223
Author(s):  
Jean C Uwimana

Background: The purpose of BLS is to maintain adequate ventilation and circulation until a means can be used to reverse the underlying cause of cardiac arrest.Worse outcomes are obtained when BLS is being done by non-trained persons. Objectives: To assess the knowledge of BLS among KIBOGORA district hospital staff and the impact of BLS training on retaining BLS skills among clinical and non-clinical KIBOGORA hospital staff. Materials and Methods: This pilot study was conducted in KIBOGORA hospital. A pre training test was given to every participant and after the training, a posttest was given to all participants. Before completing the pretest questionnaire, each participant had to choose a code made of at least 2 characters and the same code had to appear on the posttest questionnaire of the same participant. A grading system was used to categorize the level of participants’ knowledge on BLS skills. Results: Among 196 trained staff, 40 completed the pre training questionnaire .82.50 % of the subjects that completed the pre training questionnaire were clinical staff whereas 17.50% were non clinical staff. 54.55% and 33.33% of the clinical staff had respectively poor and fair knowledge on Basic Life Support (BLS) and only 6.06% were good at BLS however none of clinical staff was very good or excellent on BLS. All of the non-clinical staff that participated in the study had either a poor or fair knowledge on BLS. After the training, both clinical and non-clinical staff that completed the pre-training questionnaire, completed the post training questionnaire.30.30% of clinical staff that completed the questionnaire were good on BLS.The number of participants with an average or fair knowledge on BLSwere 27.27% in each category. 6.06% and 3.03% were excellent or very good on Basic Life Support. On the other hand, 42.86% and 28.57% of non-clinical staff had respectively poor and fair knowledge on BLS. Conclusion: After the training, knowledge on BLS improved both for clinical and non-clinical staff however more refresher courses are needed to reduce the gap seen in theoretical knowledge as well as practical skills


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document