The impact of chronic Aflatoxin B1 exposure and p53 genotype on base excision repair in mouse lung and liver

Author(s):  
Jeanne E. Mulder ◽  
Genevieve S. Bondy ◽  
Rekha Mehta ◽  
Thomas E. Massey
NAR Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron M Fleming ◽  
Cynthia J Burrows

Abstract Many cancer-associated genes are regulated by guanine (G)-rich sequences that are capable of refolding from the canonical duplex structure to an intrastrand G-quadruplex. These same sequences are sensitive to oxidative damage that is repaired by the base excision repair glycosylases OGG1 and NEIL1–3. We describe studies indicating that oxidation of a guanosine base in a gene promoter G-quadruplex can lead to up- and downregulation of gene expression that is location dependent and involves the base excision repair pathway in which the first intermediate, an apurinic (AP) site, plays a key role mediated by AP endonuclease 1 (APE1/REF1). The nuclease activity of APE1 is paused at a G-quadruplex, while the REF1 capacity of this protein engages activating transcription factors such as HIF-1α, AP-1 and p53. The mechanism has been probed by in vitro biophysical studies, whole-genome approaches and reporter plasmids in cellulo. Replacement of promoter elements by a G-quadruplex sequence usually led to upregulation, but depending on the strand and precise location, examples of downregulation were also found. The impact of oxidative stress-mediated lesions in the G-rich sequence enhanced the effect, whether it was positive or negative.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 725
Author(s):  
Karolina Boguszewska ◽  
Michał Szewczuk ◽  
Julia Kaźmierczak-Barańska ◽  
Bolesław T. Karwowski

The clustered DNA lesions (CDLs) are a characteristic feature of ionizing radiation’s impact on the human genetic material. CDLs impair the efficiency of cellular repair machinery, especially base excision repair (BER). When CDLs contain a lesion repaired by BER (e.g., apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites) and a bulkier 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxypurine (cdPu), which is not a substrate for BER, the repair efficiency of the first one may be affected. The cdPus’ influence on the efficiency of nuclear BER in xrs5 cells have been investigated using synthetic oligonucleotides with bi-stranded CDL (containing (5′S) 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyadenosine (ScdA), (5′R) 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyadenosine (RcdA), (5′S) 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyguanosine (ScdG) or (5′R) 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyguanosine (RcdG) in one strand and an AP site in the other strand at different interlesion distances). Here, for the first time, the impact of ScdG and RcdG was experimentally tested in the context of nuclear BER. This study shows that the presence of RcdA inhibits BER more than ScdA; however, ScdG decreases repair level more than RcdG. Moreover, AP sites located ≤10 base pairs to the cdPu on its 5′-end side were repaired less efficiently than AP sites located ≤10 base pairs on the 3′-end side of cdPu. The strand with an AP site placed opposite cdPu or one base in the 5′-end direction was not reconstituted for cdA nor cdG. CdPus affect the repair of the other lesion within the CDL. It may translate to a prolonged lifetime of unrepaired lesions leading to mutations and impaired cellular processes. Therefore, future research should focus on exploring this subject in more detail.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (10) ◽  
pp. 2604-2609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron M. Fleming ◽  
Yun Ding ◽  
Cynthia J. Burrows

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have emerged as important cellular-signaling agents for cellular survival. Herein, we demonstrate that ROS-mediated oxidation of DNA to yield 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (OG) in gene promoters is a signaling agent for gene activation. Enhanced gene expression occurs when OG is formed in guanine-rich, potential G-quadruplex–forming sequences (PQS) in promoter-coding strands, initiating base excision repair (BER) by 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1), yielding an abasic site (AP). The AP enables melting of the duplex to unmask the PQS, adopting a G-quadruplex fold in which apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) binds, but inefficiently cleaves, the AP for activation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or endonuclease III-like protein 1 (NTHL1) genes. These details were mapped via synthesis of OG and AP analogs at single-nucleotide precision within the promoter of a luciferase reporter system. The reporters were analyzed in human and mouse cells while selectively knocking out or down critical BER proteins to identify the impact on luciferase expression. Identification of the oxidatively modified DNA base OG to guide BER activity in a gene promoter and impact cellular phenotype ascribes an epigenetic role to OG.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 27-28
Author(s):  
Chengcheng Liao ◽  
Srikanth Talluri ◽  
Subodh Kumar ◽  
Leutz Buon ◽  
Jiangning Zhao ◽  
...  

Multiple myeloma (MM) cells demonstrate significant genomic instability with acquisition of new genomic events over time. In an effort to decipher the pathways utilized by MM cells to genomically evolve and to acquire proliferative advantage as well as develop drug resistance, we have investigated role of various pathway intermediates. Based on our prior results showing elevated homologous recombination (HR) contributing to genomic instability and development of drug resistance, we have further studied RAD51, the key HR gene. Also based on the dysfunctional base excision repair (BER) that can increase DNA damage and dysregulate genome stability, we have investigated apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (APEX)1/2 in MM. We first observed that both APEX1 and APEX2 interact with multiple HR genes in MM. APEX1 interacts with P73, a known transcriptional regulator of RAD51 at RAD51 promoter, and contributes to its transcriptional upregulation and increase in HR activity. To further extend these observations, we conducted sequential chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-reChIP) assays, using MM.1S cells. For the first ChIP, anti-APEX1 and for the reChIP anti-p73 antibody was used. DNA recovered was used for real-time Q-PCR assays, using promoter-specific primers. Colocalization of APEX1 and p73 was thus confirmed on the promoters of three HR related genes (RAD51, BRCA1 and BLM), whereas interaction was not observed for CDK2 promoter. These data suggested that APEX1 may be involved in the overall regulation of HR machinery. To investigate the role of APEX1 in genomewide transcriptional regulation in the context of HR, we cultured MM (H929 and MM.1S) cells in the presence or absence of camptothecin (CPT; a topoisomerase I inhibitor that induces DSBs which are mainly repaired by HR), and conducted ChIP assays using anti-APEX1 antibody followed by DNA sequencing. We have confirmed the interaction of APEX1 with RAD51 promoter and the impact of CPT, using Q-PCR and observe that the occupancy of RAD51 promoter by APEX1 increases following treatment with CPT. The sequencing data to be presented will identify genomic regions occupied by APEX1 under spontaneous as well as modulated HR conditions. We have further confirmed interrelationship between these two key pathway intermediates in MM. We observe that overexpression of APEX1 increases abasic sites in MM as well as another cancer (esophageal adenocarcinoma) cells, while RAD51-knockdown in these cells prevents the increase in abasic sites by APEX1. Similarly, APEX1-overexpression increased HR activity which was prevented by RAD51 inhibition, indicating that APEX-induced RAD51 contributes to dysregulation of both the HR and base excision repair.We also demonstrated thatAPEX-overexpression in normal hematopoietic cells increased HR and genomic instability (as assessed by micronuclei), which was reversed by RAD51 inhibitor. The treatment of control plasmid transfected CD138+ normal plasma cells with RAD51 inhibitor reduced micronuclei by 53.5%. Importantly, APEX1-overexpression in these cells increased micronuclei by 34.7%, whereas treatment of these cells with RAD51 inhibitor completely reversed this increase. Similarly, the treatment of bone marrow/stromal (HS5) cells with RAD51 inhibitor reduced micronuclei in APEX1-overexpressing cells by 55%. This unique functional interaction between APEX nuclease and RAD51 also provides rationale for combining APEX inhibitors with chemotherapeutic agents. Consistently, we observe thatAPEX inhibition synergistically increases the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents in MM cells. We also investigated the impact of simultaneous suppression of APEX1 and RAD51. Cancer cells (FLO-1) were transduced with control shRNAs or those targeting APEX1, RAD51 or both, and following puromycin selection evaluated for HR and evidence of apoptosis. Combined RAD51/APEX1 knockdown led to a significantly increased apoptosis (P=0.0003), relative to RAD51 or APEX1 inhibition alone. In summary, we report an interesting interaction/crosstalk between 2 major DNA repair pathway intermediates, APEX1 and RAD51 recombinase, driving genomic evolution in MM. These results provide insight into processes driving genomic progression and suggest possible avenues to control evolution of the disease and its clinical consequences in MM. Disclosures Munshi: Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; C4: Current equity holder in private company; AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (32) ◽  
pp. 4758-4772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattia Poletto ◽  
Arnaud J. Legrand ◽  
Grigory L. Dianov

Our current understanding of cancer suggests that every tumour has individual features. Approaches to cancer treatment require thorough comprehension of the mechanisms triggering genomic instability and protecting cancer cells from therapeutic treatments. Base excision repair (BER) is a frontline DNA repair system that is responsible for maintaining genome integrity. The BER pathway prevents the occurrence of disease, including cancer, by constantly repairing DNA base lesions and DNA single strand breaks caused by endogenous and exogenous mutagens. BER is an important DNA repair system for cancer cell survival, as it can affect both chemoand radio-resistance of tumours. Variations in BER capacity are likely responsible for a number of cases of sporadic cancer and may also modulate cancer sensitivity and resistance to therapeutic treatments. For these reasons, it is broadly accepted that targeting BER enzymes might be a promising approach to personalised anti-cancer therapy. However, recent advances in both treatment strategies and the comprehension of cancer development call for a better understanding of the consequences of BER inhibition. Indeed, the impact on both the tumour microenvironment and healthy tissues is still unclear. This review will summarise the current status of the approaches exploiting BER targeting, describing the most promising small molecule inhibitors and synthetic lethality strategies, as well as potential limitations of these approaches.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 1426-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel J. Carter ◽  
Jason L. Parsons

Base excision repair (BER) is an essential DNA repair pathway involved in the maintenance of genome stability and thus in the prevention of human diseases, such as premature aging, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer. Protein posttranslational modifications (PTMs), including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, SUMOylation, and ubiquitylation, have emerged as important contributors in controlling cellular BER protein levels, enzymatic activities, protein-protein interactions, and protein cellular localization. These PTMs therefore play key roles in regulating the BER pathway and are consequently crucial for coordinating an efficient cellular DNA damage response. In this review, we summarize the presently available data on characterized PTMs of key BER proteins, the functional consequences of these modifications at the protein level, and also the impact on BERin vitroandin vivo.


2002 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine J. Kim ◽  
Indraneel Chakrabarty ◽  
Guang-Zhi Li ◽  
Sabine Grösch ◽  
Bernd Kaina ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richarda de Voer ◽  
Paul W Doetsch ◽  
Roland Kuiper ◽  
Barbara Rivera

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document