scholarly journals Engineering of biomaterials for tumor modeling

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 100117
Author(s):  
S.R. Choi ◽  
Y. Yang ◽  
K.Y. Huang ◽  
H.J. Kong ◽  
M.J. Flick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bioprinting ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e00079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Cagri Oztan ◽  
Nashat Nawafleh ◽  
Yiqun Zhou ◽  
Piumi Y. Liyanage ◽  
Sajini D. Hettiarachchi ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (6Part27) ◽  
pp. 3356-3356
Author(s):  
B Titz ◽  
M Vanderhoek ◽  
U Simoncic ◽  
V Adhikarla ◽  
R Jeraj

Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (22) ◽  
pp. 33461-33471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Yuan Mao ◽  
Jin-Xiang Dai ◽  
Hong-Hao Zhou ◽  
Zhao-Qian Liu ◽  
Wei-Lin Jin

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl 3) ◽  
pp. iii142.2-iii142
Author(s):  
Marc Zuckermann ◽  
Volker Hovestadt ◽  
Christiane B. Knobbe-Thomsen ◽  
Marc Zapatka ◽  
Paul A. Northcott ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12651-e12651
Author(s):  
John A Cole ◽  
Joseph R Peterson ◽  
Tyler M Earnest ◽  
Micahel J Hallock ◽  
John R Pfeiffer ◽  
...  

e12651 Background: Nutrient and drug penetration into any solid tumor are critical determinants of the tumor's response to treatment. They depend on both the density of microvasculature within the tumor microenvironment, as well as the exchange rates of nutrients between the microvasculature and the extracellular space. But these parameters are heterogenous, varying considerably from location to location within the tumor and surrounding tissues. The Toft's model and its analogues date back to the early 1990s, and have been used to estimate vascular density, exchange rates, and extracellular-extravascular volume in a spatially-resolved manner using dynamic contrast enhaced (DCE) MRI's. Unfortunately, accurately extracting kinetic parameters from a DCE time-series requires the images to have a time-resolution of just a few seconds, which is rarely done in clinical practice. Methods: We employ a custom designed parallel algorithm to fit DCE MRI data to an exactly-solved ODE model of tissue perfusion kinetics. Results: Here we describe a simplified model of tissue perfusion that can be fit to DCE time traces with temporal resolutions of 90 seconds or more. We show that for many breast tumors, the vascular density and tissue-vascular exchange rate are such that they give rise to a halo of fast-perfusing tissue on the tumor periphery, and slower-perfusing tissue inside. We then use this model as part of a more comprehensive tumor simulation methodology to predict how different patients will respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We find that the incorporation of our microvascular model gives rise to significantly more accurate predictions of post-treatment tumor volume. Conclusions: Performing perfusion kinetics analyses on clinical MRIs is both challenging, but critical for accurately predicting how a patient will respond to treatment. Our model, which relaxes the requirement for fine DCE temporal resolution, allows for these analyses to be performed on a larger swath of patients without the need for small volumes of interest, or ultra-fast MRI techniques. Moreover, when used within a broader tumor-modeling framework, our model increases the accuracy of predictions of tumor response to NACT.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Oldrini ◽  
Álvaro Curiel-García ◽  
Carolina Marques ◽  
Veronica Matia ◽  
Özge Uluçkan ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. CIN.S11583 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Johnson ◽  
Steve McKeever ◽  
Georgios Stamatakos ◽  
Dimitra Dionysiou ◽  
Norbert Graf ◽  
...  

This paper discusses the need for interconnecting computational cancer models from different sources and scales within clinically relevant scenarios to increase the accuracy of the models and speed up their clinical adaptation, validation, and eventual translation. We briefly review current interoperability efforts drawing upon our experiences with the development of in silico models for predictive oncology within a number of European Commission Virtual Physiological Human initiative projects on cancer. A clinically relevant scenario, addressing brain tumor modeling that illustrates the need for coupling models from different sources and levels of complexity, is described. General approaches to enabling interoperability using XML-based markup languages for biological modeling are reviewed, concluding with a discussion on efforts towards developing cancer-specific XML markup to couple multiple component models for predictive in silico oncology.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 130-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Kurtz ◽  
Florian Scherer ◽  
Aaron M. Newman ◽  
Alexander F. Lovejoy ◽  
Daniel M. Klass ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The prognosis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who fail initial therapy remains poor. Current prognostic methods to identify patients destined for failure employ baseline molecular profiles or imaging data at fixed milestones, thus sub-optimally capturing functional response dynamics. Noninvasive detection of tumor-specific DNA sequences in the plasma, or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), provides a window of opportunity to observe these changes early during therapy. We sought to relate early ctDNA kinetics during therapy to tumor volume, therapeutic responses, and ultimate clinical outcomes. Methods: Using CAPP-Seq, a next-generation sequencing platform for detection of ctDNA (Newman Nature Medicine 2014), we prospectively profiled patients with DLBCL receiving combination immunochemotherapy at Stanford University. Tumor samples were used to define tumor specific somatic alterations, which were then monitored in plasma. We examined two methods of assessing ctDNA change over time: a simple heuristic model (assessing the change in ctDNA concentration from cycle 1 to cycle 2), and a biologically based mathematical model of ctDNA dynamics to predict tumor volume and patient outcomes. Results: We sequenced tumor and plasma samples (n=135) from ten patients receiving Rituximab-containing regimens. Plasma samples were collected prior to, during, and immediately after chemotherapy, with a median of 7 samples per patient during the first therapy cycle. Across patients, ctDNA concentrations varied over a 6-log range (Figure 1). The change in ctDNA concentration between cycle 1 and cycle 2 generally tracked with FDG PET/CT response - patients achieving a PR or CR had an average decrease of 2.9±0.8 logs in ctDNA concentration, compared to an increase of 0.3±0.8 logs for those with SD or PD (p<0.001). However, this metric failed to capture some patients who ultimately relapsed after radiographic remission. We therefore developed a multi-compartmental ordinary-differential equation (ODE) model of tumor dynamics capturing tumor volume, ctDNA, and the effect of chemotherapy. We performed nonlinear regression to fit data to this model using serial ctDNA measurements from individual patients, thereby creating continuous, patient-specific models of both ctDNA and tumor volume (Figure 1a-b). This mathematical model significantly fit ctDNA measurements and predicted tumor volumes across patients and samples (Figure 1c). Using ctDNA measurements from the first 2 cycles of therapy, this model accurately predicted clinical outcomes for all ten patients, including relapse after radiographic remission. An additional cohort of patients will be presented at this meeting. Conclusions: Given its high specificity and large dynamic range, ctDNA provides an opportunity to monitor the dynamics of therapeutic response in patients with DLBCL. Methods capturing these dynamics correlate with radiographic response. Given the complexity of tumor dynamics, heuristic models of ctDNA may less faithfully capture ultimate clinical outcomes. Personalized mathematical models of ctDNA can potentially reflect tumor dynamics and predict clinical outcomes for individual patients. Figure 1. Personalized tumor modeling from ctDNA tumor dynamics. a) An example of a model of ctDNA fit to observed data for a single patient (DLBCL010). b) The corresponding tumor volume prediction over time for patient DLBCL010. c) Summary of the mathematical model across ten patients, demonstrating the fit between measured data and the model. Figure 1. Personalized tumor modeling from ctDNA tumor dynamics. a) An example of a model of ctDNA fit to observed data for a single patient (DLBCL010). b) The corresponding tumor volume prediction over time for patient DLBCL010. c) Summary of the mathematical model across ten patients, demonstrating the fit between measured data and the model. Disclosures Newman: Roche: Consultancy. Klass:Roche: Employment. Gambhir:CellSight: Consultancy. Diehn:Roche: Consultancy. Alizadeh:Genentech: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Happawana Gemunu ◽  
Premasiri Amaranath ◽  
Rosen Arye

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document