Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Approaches on the Prediction of the Electronic Properties of Perovskites: A Case Study of ABX3 and A2BB’X6

2021 ◽  
pp. 102462
Author(s):  
Ericsson Tetteh Chenebuah ◽  
Michel Nganbe ◽  
Alain Beaudelaire Tchagang
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Electronic Properties ◽  
Learning Approaches

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Detection of Email Spam With the Aid of Machine Learning Approaches

2021 ◽  
Vol 1022 ◽  
pp. 012113
Author(s):  
Mangena Venu Madhavan ◽  
Sagar Pande ◽  
Pooja Umekar ◽  
Tushar Mahore ◽  
Dhiraj Kalyankar
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Email Spam

scholarly journals Efficient Prediction of Structural and Electronic Properties of Hybrid 2D Materials Using Complementary DFT and Machine Learning Approaches

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1800128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif Abdulkader Tawfik ◽  
Olexandr Isayev ◽  
Catherine Stampfl ◽  
Joe Shapter ◽  
David A. Winkler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Electronic Properties ◽  
2D Materials ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Structural And Electronic Properties ◽  
Efficient Prediction

scholarly journals From Characters to Time Intervals: New Paradigms for Evaluation and Neural Parsing of Time Normalizations

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 343-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Egoitz Laparra ◽  
Dongfang Xu ◽  
Steven Bethard
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Semantic Parsing ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Semantic Composition ◽  
Previous State ◽  
New Scoring

This paper presents the first model for time normalization trained on the SCATE corpus. In the SCATE schema, time expressions are annotated as a semantic composition of time entities. This novel schema favors machine learning approaches, as it can be viewed as a semantic parsing task. In this work, we propose a character level multi-output neural network that outperforms previous state-of-the-art built on the TimeML schema. To compare predictions of systems that follow both SCATE and TimeML, we present a new scoring metric for time intervals. We also apply this new metric to carry out a comparative analysis of the annotations of both schemes in the same corpus.

scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis for 2D Object Recognition: A Case Study with Tactode Puzzle-Like Tiles

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Daniel Silva ◽  
Armando Sousa ◽  
Valter Costa
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Object Recognition ◽  
Template Matching ◽  
Recognition Performance ◽  
Regions Of Interest ◽  
The Other ◽  
Classification Methods

Object recognition represents the ability of a system to identify objects, humans or animals in images. Within this domain, this work presents a comparative analysis among different classification methods aiming at Tactode tile recognition. The covered methods include: (i) machine learning with HOG and SVM; (ii) deep learning with CNNs such as VGG16, VGG19, ResNet152, MobileNetV2, SSD and YOLOv4; (iii) matching of handcrafted features with SIFT, SURF, BRISK and ORB; and (iv) template matching. A dataset was created to train learning-based methods (i and ii), and with respect to the other methods (iii and iv), a template dataset was used. To evaluate the performance of the recognition methods, two test datasets were built: tactode_small and tactode_big, which consisted of 288 and 12,000 images, holding 2784 and 96,000 regions of interest for classification, respectively. SSD and YOLOv4 were the worst methods for their domain, whereas ResNet152 and MobileNetV2 showed that they were strong recognition methods. SURF, ORB and BRISK demonstrated great recognition performance, while SIFT was the worst of this type of method. The methods based on template matching attained reasonable recognition results, falling behind most other methods. The top three methods of this study were: VGG16 with an accuracy of 99.96% and 99.95% for tactode_small and tactode_big, respectively; VGG19 with an accuracy of 99.96% and 99.68% for the same datasets; and HOG and SVM, which reached an accuracy of 99.93% for tactode_small and 99.86% for tactode_big, while at the same time presenting average execution times of 0.323 s and 0.232 s on the respective datasets, being the fastest method overall. This work demonstrated that VGG16 was the best choice for this case study, since it minimised the misclassifications for both test datasets.

scholarly journals Deep Learning for Recommender Systems: A Netflix Case Study

AI Magazine ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-18
Author(s):  
Harald Steck ◽  
Linas Baltrunas ◽  
Ehtsham Elahi ◽  
Dawen Liang ◽  
Yves Raimond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Recommender Systems ◽  
Input Data ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Recommendation Algorithms

Deep learning has profoundly impacted many areas of machine learning. However, it took a while for its impact to be felt in the field of recommender systems. In this article, we outline some of the challenges encountered and lessons learned in using deep learning for recommender systems at Netflix. We first provide an overview of the various recommendation tasks on the Netflix service. We found that different model architectures excel at different tasks. Even though many deep-learning models can be understood as extensions of existing (simple) recommendation algorithms, we initially did not observe significant improvements in performance over well-tuned non-deep-learning approaches. Only when we added numerous features of heterogeneous types to the input data, deep-learning models did start to shine in our setting. We also observed that deep-learning methods can exacerbate the problem of offline–online metric (mis-)alignment. After addressing these challenges, deep learning has ultimately resulted in large improvements to our recommendations as measured by both offline and online metrics. On the practical side, integrating deep-learning toolboxes in our system has made it faster and easier to implement and experiment with both deep-learning and non-deep-learning approaches for various recommendation tasks. We conclude this article by summarizing our take-aways that may generalize to other applications beyond Netflix.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document