scholarly journals Distinguishing the precision of spatial recollection from its success: Evidence from healthy aging and unilateral mesial temporal lobe resection

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 101-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aneesha S. Nilakantan ◽  
Donna J. Bridge ◽  
Stephen VanHaerents ◽  
Joel L. Voss
Data in Brief ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 104991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foteini Christidi ◽  
Efstratios Karavasilis ◽  
Michail Rentzos ◽  
Georgios Velonakis ◽  
Vasiliki Zouvelou ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 1668-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lasse Dührsen ◽  
Thomas Sauvigny ◽  
Patrick M. House ◽  
Stefan Stodieck ◽  
Brigitte Holst ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVETemporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common type of pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy, for which anterior mesial temporal lobe resection (AMTLR) is a treatment option. Focal cortical dysplasia Type IIIa (FCD IIIa), a developmental lesion resulting from defects in neuronal formation and migration into the temporal pole (FCD I) combined with hippocampal sclerosis (HS), can be a neuropathological finding. In this study, the authors investigate the impact of FCD IIIa on seizure outcome in patients with TLE who underwent AMTLR.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with TLE who underwent AMTLR at their institution between June 2011 and April 2014. Histopathological analysis was used to determine whether patients had HS together with FCD I (FCD IIIa) or HS alone. The groups were compared with regard to age, sex, years of epilepsy, and seizure outcome using the Engel classification.RESULTSA total of 51 patients with TLE underwent AMTLR at the authors’ institution. FCD IIIa was diagnosed in 13 cases. The patients experienced seizures for a mean duration of 31.1 years. The mean length of follow-up after the procedure was 18 months. All patients with FCD IIIa had a favorable seizure outcome (Engel Class I or II) compared with 71% of the patients with no pathological findings in the temporal pole (p < 0.01).CONCLUSIONSPatients with histopathologically proven FCD IIIa had a significantly better seizure outcome after AMTLR than patients with HS alone. Further effort should be made during presurgical evaluation to detect FCD IIIa so that the most suitable resection technique can be chosen and postoperative seizure outcome can be predicted for patient counseling.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. E2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando L. Vale ◽  
Stephen Reintjes ◽  
Hermes G. Garcia

Object The purpose of this study was to identify the complications associated with the inferior temporal gyrus approach to anterior mesial temporal lobe resection for temporal lobe epilepsy. Methods This retrospective study examined complications experienced by 483 patients during the 3 months after surgery. All surgeries were performed during 1998–2012 by the senior author (F.L.V.). Results A total of 13 complications (2.7%) were reported. Complications were 8 delayed subdural hematomas (1.6%), 2 superficial wound infections (0.4%), 1 delayed intracranial hemorrhage (0.2%), 1 small lacunar stroke (0.2%), and 1 transient frontalis nerve palsy (0.2%). Three patients with subdural hematoma (0.6%) required readmission and surgical intervention. One patient (0.2%) with delayed intracranial hemorrhage required readmission to the neuroscience intensive care unit for observation. No deaths or severe neurological impairments were reported. Among the 8 patients with subdural hematoma, 7 were older than 40 years (87.5%); however, this finding was not statistically significant (p = 0.198). Conclusions The inferior temporal gyrus approach to mesial temporal lobe resection is a safe and effective method for treating temporal lobe epilepsy. Morbidity and mortality rates associated with this procedure are lower than those associated with other neurosurgical procedures. The finding that surgical complications seem to be more common among older patients emphasizes the need for early surgical referral of patients with medically refractory epilepsy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kajol Marathe ◽  
Ali Alim-Marvasti ◽  
Karan Dahele ◽  
Fenglai Xiao ◽  
Sarah Buck ◽  
...  

Objectives: One-third of individuals with focal epilepsy do not achieve seizure freedom despite best medical therapy. Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) is the most common form of drug resistant focal epilepsy. Surgery may lead to long-term seizure remission if the epileptogenic zone can be defined and safely removed or disconnected. We compare published outcomes following open surgical techniques, radiosurgery (SRS), laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and radiofrequency ablation (RF-TC).Methods: PRISMA systematic review was performed through structured searches of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies of MTLE reporting seizure-free outcomes in ≥10 patients with ≥12 months follow-up. Due to variability in open surgical approaches, only comparative studies were included to minimize the risk of bias. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate effects sizes and a pooled estimate of the probability of seizure freedom per person-year. A mixed effects linear regression model was performed to compare effect sizes between interventions.Results: From 1,801 screened articles, 41 articles were included in the quantitative analysis. Open surgery included anterior temporal lobe resection as well as transcortical and trans-sylvian selective amygdalohippocampectomy. The pooled seizure-free rate per person-year was 0.72 (95% CI 0.66–0.79) with trans-sylvian selective amygdalohippocampectomy, 0.59 (95% CI 0.53–0.65) with LITT, 0.70 (95% CI 0.64–0.77) with anterior temporal lobe resection, 0.60 (95% CI 0.49–0.73) with transcortical selective amygdalohippocampectomy, 0.38 (95% CI 0.14–1.00) with RF-TC and 0.50 (95% CI 0.34–0.73) with SRS. Follow up duration and study sizes were limited with LITT and RF-TC. A mixed-effects linear regression model suggests significant differences between interventions, with LITT, ATLR and SAH demonstrating the largest effects estimates and RF-TC the lowest.Conclusions: Overall, novel “minimally invasive” approaches are still comparatively less efficacious than open surgery. LITT shows promising seizure effectiveness, however follow-up durations are shorter for minimally invasive approaches so the durability of the outcomes cannot yet be assessed. Secondary outcome measures such as Neurological complications, neuropsychological outcome and interventional morbidity are poorly reported but are important considerations when deciding on first-line treatments.


Author(s):  
Gavin J.B. Elias ◽  
Jürgen Germann ◽  
Clemens Neudorfer ◽  
Andrew A. Namasivayam ◽  
Aaron Loh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document