Good property of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for diagnosing and classifying malnutrition in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy

Nutrition ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 111420
Author(s):  
Peiyu Wang ◽  
Xiankai Chen ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
Xianben Liu ◽  
Yin Li
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peiyu Wang ◽  
Yin Li ◽  
Xianben Liu

Abstract   In 2019, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) established global malnutrition diagnostic criteria and classification methods. This study aimed to investigate the application of GLIM criteria in nutrition assessment and perioperative management in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. Methods A prospective institutional database of 212 esophageal cancer patients was reviewed. The property of the GLIM criteria in diagnosing malnutrition and predicting adverse therapeutic outcomes were evaluated. The two-step approach of initially screening malnutrition risk with conventional tools and then establishing diagnosis and classification with the GLIM criteria was investigated. The candidate malnutrition screening tools include the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, the Short-Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment, and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index. Results Among the included 192 patients, the proportions of moderate and severe malnutrition diagnosed by the GLIM criteria were 42.7% and 30.2% before surgery. In multivariable analyses, severe malnutrition was predictive of perioperative overall complications and major complications (both P < 0.001). Among the four candidates, malnutrition screened by the MUST showed highest sensitivity (90.7%), specificity (92.3%) and diagnosis consistency with the GLIM criteria. The two-step approach of MUST-GLIM showed comparable performance with pure GLIM criteria in predicting perioperative morbidities and survival outcomes, better than the conjunction of other three malnutrition screening tools with the GLIM criteria. Conclusion The GLIM criteria should be highlighted in perioperative management of esophageal cancer patients. The MUST is the recommended initial malnutrition screening tool in implementing the GLIM criteria.


2001 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Hideo Shimada ◽  
Osamu Chino ◽  
Takayuki Nishi ◽  
Hikaru Tanaka ◽  
Yoshifumi Kise ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. ix78
Author(s):  
A.U. Rehman ◽  
M.A. Iqbal ◽  
S. Saikia ◽  
P.K. Mishra ◽  
S.S. Saluja ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
M.R. Boekhoff ◽  
I.L. Defize ◽  
A.S. Borggreve ◽  
R. van Hillegersberg ◽  
A.N.T.J. Kotte ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nakimuli Esther ◽  
Ssentongo Julius ◽  
Mwaka Amos Deogratius

Abstract Background In the low- and middle-income countries, most patients with esophageal cancer present with advanced stage disease and experience poor survival. There is inadequate understanding of the factors that influence decisions to and actual health-seeking, and adherence to treatment regimens among esophageal cancer patients in Uganda, yet this knowledge is critical in informing interventions to promote prompt health-seeking, diagnosis at early stage and access to appropriate cancer therapy to improve survival. We explored health-seeking experiences and adherence to treatment among esophageal cancer patients attending the Uganda Cancer Institute. Methods We conducted an interview based qualitative study at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI). Participants included patients with established histology diagnosis of esophageal cancer and healthcare professionals involved in the care of these patients. We used purposive sampling approach to select study participants. In-depth and key informant interviews were used in data collection. Data collection was conducted till point of data saturation was reached. Thematic content analysis approach was used in data analyses and interpretations. Themes and subthemes were identified deductively. Results Sixteen patients and 17 healthcare professionals were included in the study. Delayed health-seeking and poor adherence to treatment were related to (i) emotional and psychosocial factors including stress of cancer diagnosis, stigma related to esophageal cancer symptoms, and fear of loss of jobs and livelihood, (ii) limited knowledge and recognition of esophageal cancer symptoms by both patients and primary healthcare professionals, and (iii) limited access to specialized cancer care, mainly because of long distance to the facility and associated high transport cost. Patients were generally enthused with patient – provider relationships at the UCI. While inadequate communication and some degree of incivility were reported, majority of patients thought the healthcare professionals were empathetic and supportive. Conclusion Health system and individual patient factors influence health-seeking for symptoms of esophageal cancer and adherence to treatment schedule for the disease. Interventions to improve access to and acceptability of esophageal cancer services, as well as increase public awareness of esophageal cancer risk factors and symptoms could lead to earlier diagnosis and potentially better survival from the disease in Uganda.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110246
Author(s):  
Seokmo Lee ◽  
Yunseon Choi ◽  
Geumju Park ◽  
Sunmi Jo ◽  
Sun Seong Lee ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: This study evaluated the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) performed before and after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in esophageal cancer. Methods: We analyzed the prognosis of 50 non-metastatic squamous cell esophageal cancer (T1-4N0-2) patients who underwent CCRT with curative intent at Inje University Busan Paik Hospital and Haeundae Paik Hospital from 2009 to 2019. Median total radiation dose was 54 Gy (range 34-66 Gy). Our aim was to investigate the relationship between PET/CT values and prognosis. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The median follow-up period was 9.9 months (range 1.7-85.7). Median baseline maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was 14.2 (range 3.2-27.7). After treatment, 29 patients (58%) showed disease progression. The 3-year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 24.2% and 54.5%, respectively. PFS was significantly lower ( P = 0.015) when SUVmax of initial PET/CT exceeded 10 (n = 22). However, OS did not reach a significant difference based on maximum SUV ( P = 0.282). Small metabolic tumor volume (≤14.1) was related with good PFS ( P = 0.002) and OS ( P = 0.001). Small total lesion of glycolysis (≤107.3) also had a significant good prognostic effect on PFS ( P = 0.009) and OS ( P = 0.025). In a subgroup analysis of 18 patients with follow-up PET/CT, the patients with SUV max ≤3.5 in follow-up PET/CT showed longer PFS ( P = 0.028) than those with a maximum SUV >3.5. Conclusion: Maximum SUV of PET/CT is useful in predicting prognosis of esophageal cancer patients treated with CCRT. Efforts to find more effective treatments for patients at high risk of progression are still warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document