scholarly journals Examining the role of integration in marine spatial planning: Towards an analytical framework to understand challenges in diverse settings

2019 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Saunders ◽  
Michael Gilek ◽  
Jon Day ◽  
Björn Hassler ◽  
Jennifer McCann ◽  
...  
2022 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. 112108
Author(s):  
V. Stelzenmüller ◽  
J. Letschert ◽  
A. Gimpel ◽  
C. Kraan ◽  
W.N. Probst ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Kaisa Granqvist ◽  
Raine Mäntysalo ◽  
Hanna Mattila ◽  
Antero Hirvensalo ◽  
Satu Teerikangas ◽  
...  

This article scrutinises the role of communicative and strategic rationalities in the strategic spatial planning of a city. With an analytical framework that draws on Habermas’ theory of communicative action, the article identifies communicatively and strategically rational action orientations in competitive and collaborative settings at different scales of strategic spatial planning. The analytical feasibility of the framework is examined by analysing strategic spatial planning in the city of Turku (Finland). By providing insights on the central role of strategic rationality, the article contributes to the theoretical discourse on strategic spatial planning that has been strained by an overemphasis on communicative rationality. Regarding relevance to planning practice, the article adds to the understanding of the complex governance networks in which a city engages in its strategic spatial planning.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELENA GISSI ◽  
Juan Luis Suarez de Vivero

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) has experienced vigorous growth on the international scale in recent years, and several practices has emerged from different countries. The demand for specific training in the preparation and implementation of marine planning has therefore already shown itself to be quite relevant on a global scale. Educational initiatives related to MSP have to respond to the increased complexity of MSP, which integrates environmental and economic perspectives on marine resources and maritime sectors, considering governance framework as well as maritime affairs and legislation.This paper aims at addressing the educational and training needs for the development of both academic education and professional training in MSP. Learning skills, contents and methods of an ‘ideal’ MSP course are depicted from widely accepted operative guides on MSP and from the EU Framework Directive on MSP (2014/89/EU). They are considered for the analysis of the current educational offer around MSP, performed in a sample of countries that have already undergone a process of implementation of MSP by Law. As result, beside the great variety of courses, it emerges that MSP education seems to be often regarded from an environmental perspective – in continuity with Integrated Coastal Management education – while planning theory and experiences in MSP are the least represented contents. Results are discussed in relation to three major challenges: i) how educational offer reflects on transdisciplinarity, ii) the role of theory in MSP courses, and iii) the enforceability of Plans as major concern in MSP.


Marine Policy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Hong Liu ◽  
Chin-Cheng Wu ◽  
Hao-Tang Jhan ◽  
Ching-Hsien Ho

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Clarke ◽  
Wesley Flannery

Marine spatial planning (MSP) has become the most adopted approach for sustainablemarine governance. While MSP has transformative capacity, evaluations of itsimplementation illustrate large gaps between how it is conceptualised and how it ispracticed. We argue that these gaps arise from MSP being implemented throughpost-political processes. Although MSP has been explored through post-politicallenses, these evaluations are incomplete and do not provide sufficient detail aboutthe complex nature of the post-political condition. Drawing on seminal literature,we conceptualise the post-political as consisting of highly interconnectedmodalities of depoliticisation, including: neoliberalism; choreographed participation;path dependency; technocratic-managerialism; and the illusion of progressivechange. Using these modalities as an analytical framework, we evaluate EnglishMSP and find that it focuses on entrenching neoliberal logic through: tokenisticparticipation; wholescale adoption of path-dependent solutions; obstructionistdeployment of inactive technological solutions; and promising progressive change.We do not, however, view the post-political condition as unresolvable and wedevelop a suite of suggestions for the re-politicisation of MSP which, collectively,could form the basis for more radical forms of MSP.


2019 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 64-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niina Käyhkö ◽  
Zakaria A. Khamis ◽  
Salla Eilola ◽  
Elina Virtanen ◽  
Muhammad Juma Muhammad ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 466-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Retzlaff ◽  
Charlene LeBleu

Marine spatial planning (MSP) is a tool for managing and improving marine environments. The field is dominated by natural scientists and has not been commonly associated with planning. This research analyzes the MSP literature to explore how planners can contribute to MSP research and practice. We organize the literature into eight themes, focusing on how planners may be able to contribute to MSP research and practice: ocean zoning, defining boundaries, planning in dynamic environments, stakeholder involvement, information needs, integrating ocean and land-use management, managing multiple and conflicting uses, and transboundary institutional structures. We conclude that planners have a lot to contribute in these eight areas.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Young

The oceans hold a stunning potential for meeting our ever-growing demand for energy in a sustainable manner by converting energy stored in the form of heat, waves, currents and tides. At present the offshore renewable energy industry remains in its infancy, but given the right conditions, it could grow into a significant contributor to the global energy mix. A number of inter-related barriers, such as resource and user conflicts, regulatory complexity, and a limited understanding of environmental impacts associated with offshore renewable energy technologies, as well as the general challenges surrounding ocean governance, hamper the development of the industry. Marine spatial planning is emerging around the world as a practical tool for promoting a more rational and wise use of the oceans. It could also play a significant role in promoting the speedy and environmentally sound deployment of offshore renewable energy by assisting in overcoming the various hurdles to the development of that sector of the blue economy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document