Influence of solvents on pore structure and methane adsorption capacity of lacustrine shales: An example from a Chang 7 shale sample in the Ordos Basin, China

2019 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 419-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Cao ◽  
Hui Han ◽  
Hou-wu Liu ◽  
Jian-chao Jia ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengyang Xiong ◽  
◽  
Zhenxue Jiang ◽  
Mohammad Amin Amooie ◽  
Mohamad Reza Soltanian ◽  
...  

Geofluids ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Run Chen ◽  
Yong Qin ◽  
Pengfei Zhang ◽  
Youyang Wang

The pore structure and gas adsorption are two key issues that affect the coal bed methane recovery process significantly. To change pore structure and gas adsorption, 5 coals with different ranks were treated by CS2 for 3 h using a Soxhlet extractor under ultrasonic oscillation conditions; the evolutions of pore structure and methane adsorption were examined using a high-pressure mercury intrusion porosimeter (MIP) with an AutoPore IV 9310 series mercury instrument. The results show that the cumulative pore volume and specific surface area (SSA) were increased after CS2 treatment, and the incremental micropore volume and SSA were increased and decreased before and after Ro,max=1.3%, respectively; the incremental big pore (greater than 10 nm in diameter) volumes were increased and SSA was decreased for all coals, and pore connectivity was improved. Methane adsorption capacity on coal before and after Ro,max=1.3% also was increased and decreased, respectively. There is a positive correlation between the changes in the micropore SSA and the Langmuir volume. It confirms that the changes in pore structure and methane adsorption capacity due to CS2 treatment are controlled by the rank, and the change in methane adsorption is impacted by the change of micropore SSA and suggests that the changes in pore structure are better for gas migration; the alteration in methane adsorption capacity is worse and better for methane recovery before and after Ro,max=1.3%. A conceptual mechanism of pore structure is proposed to explain methane adsorption capacity on CS2 treated coal around the Ro,max=1.3%.


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Li ◽  
Zhiyong Gao ◽  
Siyi Fang ◽  
Chao Ren ◽  
Kun Yang ◽  
...  

The characteristics of the nanopore structure in shale, tight sandstone and mudstone from the Ordos Basin of China were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, porosity and permeability tests and low-pressure nitrogen adsorption experiments. Fractal dimensions D1 and D2 were determined from the low relative pressure range (0 < P/P0 < 0.4) and the high relative pressure range (0.4 < P/P0 < 1) of nitrogen adsorption data, respectively, using the Frenkel–Halsey–Hill (FHH) model. Relationships between pore structure parameters, mineral compositions and fractal dimensions were investigated. According to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) isotherm classification standard, the morphologies of the nitrogen adsorption curves of these 14 samples belong to the H2 and H3 types. Relationships among average pore diameter, Brunner-Emmet-Teller (BET) specific surface area, pore volume, porosity and permeability have been discussed. The heterogeneities of shale nanopore structures were verified, and nanopore size mainly concentrates under 30 nm. The average fractal dimension D1 of all the samples is 2.1187, varying from 1.1755 to 2.6122, and the average fractal dimension D2 is 2.4645, with the range from 2.2144 to 2.7362. Compared with D1, D2 has stronger relationships with pore structure parameters, and can be used for analyzing pore structure characteristics.


Fuel ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingzhi Ma ◽  
Yan Song ◽  
Shaobo Liu ◽  
Lin Jiang ◽  
Feng Hong

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1243-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Zhong ◽  
Qirong Qin ◽  
Cunhui Fan ◽  
Dongfeng Hu

Fractals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 1940011 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEI CHEN ◽  
ZHENXUE JIANG ◽  
KEYU LIU ◽  
WEI YANG ◽  
SHU JIANG ◽  
...  

To better understand the nanopore characteristics and their effects on methane adsorption capacity of shales, we performed fractal analysis of nine shale samples collected from the fifth member of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin, southwest China. [Formula: see text] adsorption results show that shales have different adsorption characteristics at relative pressure of 0–0.5 and 0.5–1. Two fractal dimensions [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were calculated using the Frenkel–Halsey–Hill (FHH) equation. Results show that the methane adsorption capacity increases with the increase of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], of which [Formula: see text] has a more significant influence on adsorption capacity than [Formula: see text]. Further studies indicate that [Formula: see text] represents the pore surface fractal characteristics caused by the irregularity of shale surface, whereas [Formula: see text] represents the pore structure fractal characteristics, which is mainly affected by shale components (e.g. TOC, clay minerals) and pore parameters (e.g. average pore diameter, micropores content). A higher [Formula: see text] corresponds to a more irregular pore surface, which provides more space for methane adsorption. While a higher [Formula: see text] indicates a more complex pore structure and a stronger capillary condensation action on the pore surface, which in turn enhances the methane adsorption capacity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document