Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT quantitative parameters as prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell cancer

Author(s):  
A. Martínez ◽  
J.R. Infante ◽  
J. Quirós ◽  
J.I. Rayo ◽  
J. Serrano ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 205 (2) ◽  
pp. W150-W161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. Pasha ◽  
Charles Marcus ◽  
Carole Fakhry ◽  
Hyunseok Kang ◽  
Ana P. Kiess ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1360-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianpiero Manca ◽  
Eleonora Vanzi ◽  
Domenico Rubello ◽  
Francesco Giammarile ◽  
Gaia Grassetto ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 1108-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lale Kostakoglu ◽  
Reza Fardanesh ◽  
Marshall Posner ◽  
Peter Som ◽  
Srikar Rao ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 4977-4985 ◽  
Author(s):  
ICHIRO OGINO ◽  
SHIGENOBU WATANABE ◽  
TOSHIHIRO MISUMI ◽  
MASAHARU HATA ◽  
CHIKARA KUNISAKI

2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 1703-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.-M. Cheng ◽  
Y.-H. Dean Fang ◽  
J. Tung-Chieh Chang ◽  
C.-G. Huang ◽  
D.-L. Tsan ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 712
Author(s):  
Joohee Lee ◽  
Young Seok Cho ◽  
Jhingook Kim ◽  
Young Mog Shim ◽  
Kyung-Han Lee ◽  
...  

Background: Imaging tumor FDG avidity could complement prognostic implication in thymic epithelial tumors. We thus investigated the prognostic value of volume-based 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT parameters in thymic epithelial tumors with other clinical prognostic factors. Methods: This is a retrospective study that included 83 patients who were diagnosed with thymic epithelial tumors and underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT. PET parameters, including maximum and average standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVavg), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), were measured with a threshold of SUV 2.5. Univariate and multivariate analysis of PET parameters and clinicopathologic variables for time-to-progression was performed by using a Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: There were 21 low-risk thymomas (25.3%), 27 high-risk thymomas (32.5%), and 35 thymic carcinomas (42.2%). Recurrence or disease progression occurred in 24 patients (28.9%). On univariate analysis, Masaoka stage (p < 0.001); histologic types (p = 0.009); treatment modality (p = 0.001); and SUVmax, SUVavg, MTV, and TLG (all p < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors. SUVavg (p < 0.001) and Masaoka stage (p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: SUVavg and Masaoka stage are independent prognostic factors in thymic epithelial tumors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document