Bystander CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The role of limited English proficiency

Abstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health concern in France, given that there are 61.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants a year. The impact of bystander action, performed before the arrival of emergency medical services (EMS), on survival has never been studied in France. Purpose Determine whether bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), performed before the arrival of EMS, was correlated with an increased 30-day survival rate after an OHCA. Methods 24,885 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests witnessed in France from 1 January 2012 to 1 May 2018 were analysed to determine whether CPR, performed before the arrival of EMS, was correlated with survival. Data from the Electronic Registry of Cardiac Arrests was used. The association between the effect of CPR performed before the arrival of EMS and 30-day survival rate was studied, using propensity analysis (which included variables such as age and sex of the patient, location, cause, and year of cardiac arrest, initial cardiac rhythm, EMS response time and no-flow time). Results CPR was performed before the arrival of EMS in 14,904 cases (59.9%) and was not performed in 9,981 cases (40.1%). The 30-day survival rate was 10.2% when CRP was performed by bystanders versus 3.9% when CRP was not performed before the EMS arrival (p<0.001). CPR performed by bystanders was associated with an increased 30-day survival rate (odds ratio 1.269; 1.207 to 1.334). The effect of bystander CPR on survival Conclusion Bystander CPR performed before the arrival of EMS was associated with an increased 30-day survival rate after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in France.

Download Full-text

The Forgotten Role of Bystander CPR to Improve Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes in Oman

Oman Medical Journal ◽

10.5001/omj.2018.19 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 33 (2) ◽

pp. 95-96

Author(s):

Mahmood Al Jufaili

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Download Full-text

Diffusion of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training to Chinese Immigrants with Limited English Proficiency

Emergency Medicine International ◽

10.1155/2011/685249 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 2011 ◽

pp. 1-8 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Mei Po Yip ◽

Brandon Ong ◽

Shin Ping Tu ◽

Devora Chavez ◽

Brooke Ike ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Limited English Proficiency ◽

English Proficiency ◽

Chinese Immigrants ◽

Resuscitation Training ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Cpr Training ◽

Prehospital Cardiac Arrest ◽

Training Opportunities

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an effective intervention for prehospital cardiac arrest. Despite all available training opportunities for CPR, disparities exist in participation in CPR training, CPR knowledge, and receipt of bystander CPR for certain ethnic groups. We conducted five focus groups with Chinese immigrants who self-reported limited English proficiency (LEP). A bilingual facilitator conducted all the sessions. All discussions were taped, recorded, translated, and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed by content analysis guided by the theory of diffusion. The majority of participants did not know of CPR and did not know where to get trained. Complexity of CPR procedure, advantages of calling 9-1-1, lack of confidence, and possible liability discourage LEP individuals to learn CPR. LEP individuals welcome simplified Hands-Only CPR and are willing to perform CPR with instruction from 9-1-1 operators. Expanding the current training to include Hands-Only CPR and dispatcher-assisted CPR may motivate Chinese LEP individuals to get trained for CPR.

Download Full-text

156 Prehospital determinants of successful resuscitation after traumatic and non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Emergency Medicine Journal ◽

10.1136/emj-2020-rcemabstracts.6 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 37 (12) ◽

pp. 825.1-825

Author(s):

Ed Barnard ◽

Daniel Sandbach ◽

Tracy Nicholls ◽

Alastair Wilson ◽

Ari Ercole

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Hospital Admission ◽

Hospital Discharge ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Discharge Data ◽

Successful Resuscitation ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Number Percentage ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Aims/Objectives/BackgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is prevalent in the UK. Reported survival is lower than in countries with comparable healthcare systems; a better understanding of outcome determinants may identify areas for improvement. Aim: to compare differential determinants of survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge for traumatic (TCA) and non-traumatic cardiac arrest (NCTA).Methods/DesignAn analysis of 9109 OHCA in East of England between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2017. Univariate descriptives and multivariable analysis were used to understand the determinants of survival for NTCA and TCA. Two Utstein outcome variables were used: survival to hospital admission and hospital discharge. Data reported as number (percentage), number (percentage (95% CI)) and median (IQR) as appropriate. Continuous data have been analysed with a Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical data have been analysed with a χ2 test. Analyses were performed using the R statistical programming language.Results/ConclusionsThe incidence of OHCA was 55.1 per 100 000 population/year. The overall survival to hospital admission was 27.6% (95%CI 26.7% to 28.6%) and the overall survival to discharge was 7.9% (95%CI 7.3% to 8.5%). Survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge were both greater in the NTCA group compared with the TCA group: 27.9% vs 19.3% p=0.001, and 8.0% vs 3.8% p=0.012 respectively.Determinants of NTCA and TCA survival were different, and varied according to the outcome examined. In NTCA, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was associated with survival at discharge but not at admission, and the likelihood of bystander-CPR was dependent on geographical socioeconomic status.NTCA and TCA are clinically distinct entities with different predictors for outcome and should be reported separately. Determinants of survival to hospital admission and discharge differ in a way that likely reflects the determinants of neurological injury. Bystander CPR public engagement may be best focused in more deprived areas.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Beijing: a 5-year cross-sectional study

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041917 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (4) ◽

pp. e041917

Author(s):

Fei Shao ◽

Haibin Li ◽

Shengkui Ma ◽

Dou Li ◽

Chunsheng Li

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Urban Areas ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Term Survival ◽

Shockable Rhythm ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the trends in outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Beijing over 5 years.DesignCross-sectional study.MethodsAdult patients with OHCA of all aetiologies who were treated by the Beijing emergency medical service (EMS) between January 2013 and December 2017 were analysed. Data were collected using the Utstein Style. Cases were followed up for 1 year. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise the sample and logistic regression was performed.ResultsOverall, 5016 patients with OHCA underwent attempted resuscitation by the EMS in urban areas of Beijing during the study period. Survival to hospital discharge was 1.2% in 2013 and 1.6% in 2017 (adjusted rate ratio=1.0, p for trend=0.60). Survival to admission and neurological outcome at discharge did not significantly improve from 2013 to 2017. Patient characteristics and the aetiology and location of cardiac arrest were consistent, but there was a decrease in the initial shockable rhythm (from 6.5% to 5.6%) over the 5 years. The rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increased steadily over the years (from 10.4% to 19.4%).ConclusionSurvival after OHCA in urban areas of Beijing did not improve significantly over 5 years, with long-term survival being unchanged, although the rate of bystander CPR increased steadily, which enhanced the outcomes of patients who underwent bystander CPR.

Download Full-text

Abstract 184: AED Application in Non-Shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Does Not Reduce Survival

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.184 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Ross A Pollack ◽

Siobhan P Brown ◽

Thomas Rea ◽

Peter J Kudenchuk ◽

Myron L Weisfeldt

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Neurological Status ◽

Relative Safety ◽

Initial Rhythm ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Rhythm Analysis ◽

In Transit ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: It is well established that AEDs improve outcome in shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). An increasing proportion (now the majority) of OHCAs present with non-shockable rhythms. Survival from non-shockable OHCA depends on high-quality CPR in transit to definitive care. Studies of AED use in non-shockable in-hospital arrest (as opposed to OHCA) have shown reduced survival with AED application possibly due to CPR interruptions to apply pads and perform rhythm analysis. We sought to determine whether AED application in non-shockable public, witnessed OHCA has a significant association with survival to discharge. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of OHCA from 2010-2015 at 10 Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium centers. All adult, public, witnessed non-shockable OHCAs were included. Non-shockable arrest was defined as no shock delivered by the AED or by review of defibrillator tracings (10%). The initial rhythm on EMS arrival was used to confirm the rhythm. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurological status (modified rankin score <3). The OR was adjusted for the Utstein variables. Results: During the study period there were 1,597 non-shockable public, witnessed OHCA, 9.8% of which had an AED applied. The initial rhythm on EMS arrival was PEA or asystole in 86% of cases. Significantly more OHCA in the AED applied group had CPR performed. 6.5% of those without an AED applied survived with favorable neurologic status compared to 9% with an AED. After adjustment for the Utstein variables including bystander CPR, the aOR for survival with favorable neurologic outcome was 1.38 (95% CI:0.72-2.65). Conclusion: After adjusting for patient characteristics and bystander CPR, the application of an AED in non-shockable public witnessed OHCA had no significant association with survival or neurological outcome supporting the relative safety and potential benefit of AED application in non-shockable OHCA.

Download Full-text

Abstract 170: Challenges in Implementing an ECPR Program for Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.170 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Meshe Chonde ◽

Jeremiah Escajeda ◽

Jonathan Elmer ◽

Frank X Guyette ◽

Arthur Boujoukos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Implementation Challenges ◽

Shockable Rhythm ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Stay And Play ◽

Load And Go ◽

Mechanical Cpr ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can treat cardiac arrest refractory to conventional therapy. Many institutions are interested in developing their own ECPR program. However, there are challenges in logistics and implementation. Hypothesis: Development of an ECPR team and identification of UPMC Presbyterian as a receiving center will increase recognition of potential ECPR candidates. Methods: We developed an infrastructure of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Medic Command, and an in-hospital ECPR team. We identified inclusion criteria for patients with an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) likely to have a reversible arrest etiology and developed them into a simple checklist. These criteria were: witnessed arrest with bystander CPR, shockable rhythm, and ages 18 to 60. We trained local EMS crews to screen patients and review the checklist with a Command Physician prior to transport to our hospital. Results: From October 2015 to March 31 st 2018, there were 1165 dispatches for OHCA, of which 664 (57%) were treated and transported to the hospital and 120 to our institution. Of these, five patients underwent ECPR. Of the remaining cases, 64 (53%) had nonshockable rhythms, 48 (40%) were unwitnessed arrests, 50 (42%) were over age 60 and the remaining 20 (17%) had no documented reasons for exclusion. Prehospital CPR duration was 26 [IQR 25-40] min. Four patients (80%) underwent mechanical CPR with LUCAS device. Time from arrest to arrive on scene was 5 [IQR 4-6] min and time call MD command was 13 [IQR 7-21] min. Time to transport was 20 [IQR 19-21] min. Time from arrest to initiation of ECMO was 63 [IQR 59-69] min. Conclusions: ECPR is a relatively infrequent occurrence. Implementation challenges include prompt identification of patients with reversible OHCA causes, preferential transport to an ECPR capable facility and changing the focus of EMS in these select patients from a “stay and play” to a “load and go” mentality.

Download Full-text

Abstract P80: Short-term Outcomes of Vasopressin Administerd with Epinephrine versus Epinephrine Alone in ED for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.118.suppl_18.s_1462-c ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽

Author(s):

Tae Yun Kim ◽

Sun Woo Lee ◽

Kyuseok Kim ◽

Joong Eui Rhee ◽

Sung Koo Jung

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

National Registry ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

Emergency Medical Service System ◽

Short Term ◽

Combined Administration ◽

Before And After ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) victims are increasing, but emergency medical service system (EMSS) is not ready for them in Korea. A previous randomized, controlled clinical trial has suggested that vasopressin followed epinephrine was superior to epinephrine in patients with asystole. According to the Korean national registry of OOHCA, patients with asystole were more than two thirds of them. In Korean EMSS, no drugs are permitted to administer in the prehospital phase by law. Thereafter epinephrine or vasopressin cannot be administered until patients are transported to emergency departments (EDs). This study was to evaluate whether the combined administration of vasopressin and epinephrine in ED for OOHCA patients would increase the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival discharge. Methods: From October 2007 to May 2008, we changed the CPR protocol in adult, nontraumatic OOHCA that 40 U of vasopressin was administered as soon as possible after the first dose of epinephrine (the after group). Cardiac arrest data were collected using the Utstein template. Data from January to September 2007, when vasopressin has not been used, were also collected for comparative analysis (the before group). These two groups were compared in terms of ROSC, and survival discharge Results: There were 45 and 50 patients in the before and after groups, respectively. There was no significant differences in the initial ECG rhythm of asystole (67% vs 78%), witnessed arrest (73% vs 72%), bystander CPR (16% vs 10%), time from collapse to BLS time (6 min vs 8.5 min), and time from collapse to study drugs (23 min vs 26.5 min). The rate of sustained ROSC was similar between the before and after groups (53% vs 48%, P=0.604) as was the survival discharge (27% vs 14%, P=0.123). Conclusions: Vasopressin with administerd with epinephrine does not increase the rate of ROSC nor the survival discharge.

Download Full-text

Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

Journal of the American Heart Association ◽

10.1161/jaha.120.017930 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Richard Chocron ◽

Julia Jobe ◽

Sally Guan ◽

Madeleine Kim ◽

Mia Shigemura ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Performance Metrics ◽

Medical System ◽

Emergency Medical System ◽

Compression Rate ◽

Emergency Medical ◽

Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical intervention to improve survival following out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. We evaluated the quality of bystander CPR and whether performance varied according to the number of bystanders or provision of telecommunicator CPR (TCPR). Methods and Results We investigated non‐traumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest occurring in a large metropolitan emergency medical system during a 6‐month period. Information about bystander care was ascertained through review of the 9‐1‐1 recordings in addition to emergency medical system and hospital records to determine bystander CPR status (none versus TCPR versus unassisted), the number of bystanders on‐scene, and CPR performance metrics of compression fraction and compression rate. Of the 428 eligible out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, 76.4% received bystander CPR including 43.7% unassisted CPR and 56.3% TCPR; 35.2% had one bystander, 33.3% had 2 bystanders, and 31.5% had ≥3 bystanders. Overall compression fraction was 59% with a compression rate of 88 per minute. CPR differed according to TCPR status (fraction=52%, rate=87 per minute for TCPR versus fraction=69%, rate=102 for unassisted CPR, P <0.05 for each comparison) and the number of bystanders (fraction=55%, rate=87 per minute for 1 bystander, fraction=59%, rate=89 for 2 bystanders, fraction=65%, rate=97 for ≥3 bystanders, test for trend P <0.05 for each metric). Additional bystander actions were uncommon to include rotation of compressors (3.1%) or application of an automated external defibrillator (8.0%). Conclusions Bystander CPR quality as gauged by compression fraction and rate approached guideline goals though performance depended upon the type of CPR and number of bystanders.

Download Full-text