scholarly journals Pre-charging the defibrillator before rhythm analysis reduces hands-off time in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm

Resuscitation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Nees Iversen ◽  
Carsten Meilandt ◽  
Ulla Væggemose ◽  
Christian Juhl Terkelsen ◽  
Hans Kirkegaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Rhythm Analysis ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Off Time

Abstract 109: Automated External Defibrillators Are Rarely Used for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Denmark

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Staerk ◽  
Kasper G Lauridsen ◽  
Kristian Krogh ◽  
Hans Kirkegaard ◽  
Bo Løfgren
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Early Defibrillation ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Initial Rhythm ◽  
Rhythm Analysis ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiac Arrest Team

Introduction: Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) are widely distributed in the pre-hospital setting and reported to reduce time to defibrillation and increase survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. During in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), AEDs may allow for early defibrillation before the cardiac arrest team arrives with a manual defibrillator. However, the effect of AEDs for IHCA remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate AED usage and contribution to defibrillation before cardiac arrest team arrival during IHCA. Methods: We obtained data on IHCAs in 2016 and 2017 from the Danish nationwide registry on IHCA (DANARREST). Data included information on initial rhythm, type of defibrillator, time to first rhythm analysis, time to arrival of the cardiac arrest team, time to first defibrillation, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Results: Of 4,496 IHCAs, AEDs were used in 421 resuscitation attempts (9%). Time registrations were excluded for 6 non-shockable IHCAs due to errors in registration. Of the 421 IHCAs, 82% (n=347) were non-shockable and 16% (n=68) were shockable (data missing for 6 IHCAs). ROSC was achieved in 46% (n=158) of patients with non-shockable rhythms and 59% (n=40) of patients with shockable rhythms. For IHCAs with a shockable rhythm and usage of an AED, rhythm analysis was performed before arrival of the cardiac arrest team in 50% (n=34) of cases and defibrillation with an AED were performed in 46% (n=27) of the cases. Patients with shockable rhythms defibrillated before arrival of the cardiac team, more often achieved ROSC compared to patients defibrillated after cardiac arrest team arrival (p=0.0024). Data regarding time registration are shown in the table. Conclusion: AEDs are used in approximately 1 of 10 resuscitation attempts in Danish hospitals and contribute to defibrillation before arrival of the cardiac arrest team in 1 of 14 cardiac arrest patients.

scholarly journals Outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Beijing: a 5-year cross-sectional study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e041917
Author(s):  
Fei Shao ◽  
Haibin Li ◽  
Shengkui Ma ◽  
Dou Li ◽  
Chunsheng Li
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the trends in outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Beijing over 5 years.DesignCross-sectional study.MethodsAdult patients with OHCA of all aetiologies who were treated by the Beijing emergency medical service (EMS) between January 2013 and December 2017 were analysed. Data were collected using the Utstein Style. Cases were followed up for 1 year. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise the sample and logistic regression was performed.ResultsOverall, 5016 patients with OHCA underwent attempted resuscitation by the EMS in urban areas of Beijing during the study period. Survival to hospital discharge was 1.2% in 2013 and 1.6% in 2017 (adjusted rate ratio=1.0, p for trend=0.60). Survival to admission and neurological outcome at discharge did not significantly improve from 2013 to 2017. Patient characteristics and the aetiology and location of cardiac arrest were consistent, but there was a decrease in the initial shockable rhythm (from 6.5% to 5.6%) over the 5 years. The rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increased steadily over the years (from 10.4% to 19.4%).ConclusionSurvival after OHCA in urban areas of Beijing did not improve significantly over 5 years, with long-term survival being unchanged, although the rate of bystander CPR increased steadily, which enhanced the outcomes of patients who underwent bystander CPR.

Abstract 184: AED Application in Non-Shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Does Not Reduce Survival

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross A Pollack ◽  
Siobhan P Brown ◽  
Thomas Rea ◽  
Peter J Kudenchuk ◽  
Myron L Weisfeldt
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Relative Safety ◽  
Initial Rhythm ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Rhythm Analysis ◽  
In Transit ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: It is well established that AEDs improve outcome in shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). An increasing proportion (now the majority) of OHCAs present with non-shockable rhythms. Survival from non-shockable OHCA depends on high-quality CPR in transit to definitive care. Studies of AED use in non-shockable in-hospital arrest (as opposed to OHCA) have shown reduced survival with AED application possibly due to CPR interruptions to apply pads and perform rhythm analysis. We sought to determine whether AED application in non-shockable public, witnessed OHCA has a significant association with survival to discharge. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of OHCA from 2010-2015 at 10 Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium centers. All adult, public, witnessed non-shockable OHCAs were included. Non-shockable arrest was defined as no shock delivered by the AED or by review of defibrillator tracings (10%). The initial rhythm on EMS arrival was used to confirm the rhythm. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurological status (modified rankin score <3). The OR was adjusted for the Utstein variables. Results: During the study period there were 1,597 non-shockable public, witnessed OHCA, 9.8% of which had an AED applied. The initial rhythm on EMS arrival was PEA or asystole in 86% of cases. Significantly more OHCA in the AED applied group had CPR performed. 6.5% of those without an AED applied survived with favorable neurologic status compared to 9% with an AED. After adjustment for the Utstein variables including bystander CPR, the aOR for survival with favorable neurologic outcome was 1.38 (95% CI:0.72-2.65). Conclusion: After adjusting for patient characteristics and bystander CPR, the application of an AED in non-shockable public witnessed OHCA had no significant association with survival or neurological outcome supporting the relative safety and potential benefit of AED application in non-shockable OHCA.

Abstract 170: Challenges in Implementing an ECPR Program for Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meshe Chonde ◽  
Jeremiah Escajeda ◽  
Jonathan Elmer ◽  
Frank X Guyette ◽  
Arthur Boujoukos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Implementation Challenges ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Stay And Play ◽  
Load And Go ◽  
Mechanical Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can treat cardiac arrest refractory to conventional therapy. Many institutions are interested in developing their own ECPR program. However, there are challenges in logistics and implementation. Hypothesis: Development of an ECPR team and identification of UPMC Presbyterian as a receiving center will increase recognition of potential ECPR candidates. Methods: We developed an infrastructure of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Medic Command, and an in-hospital ECPR team. We identified inclusion criteria for patients with an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) likely to have a reversible arrest etiology and developed them into a simple checklist. These criteria were: witnessed arrest with bystander CPR, shockable rhythm, and ages 18 to 60. We trained local EMS crews to screen patients and review the checklist with a Command Physician prior to transport to our hospital. Results: From October 2015 to March 31 st 2018, there were 1165 dispatches for OHCA, of which 664 (57%) were treated and transported to the hospital and 120 to our institution. Of these, five patients underwent ECPR. Of the remaining cases, 64 (53%) had nonshockable rhythms, 48 (40%) were unwitnessed arrests, 50 (42%) were over age 60 and the remaining 20 (17%) had no documented reasons for exclusion. Prehospital CPR duration was 26 [IQR 25-40] min. Four patients (80%) underwent mechanical CPR with LUCAS device. Time from arrest to arrive on scene was 5 [IQR 4-6] min and time call MD command was 13 [IQR 7-21] min. Time to transport was 20 [IQR 19-21] min. Time from arrest to initiation of ECMO was 63 [IQR 59-69] min. Conclusions: ECPR is a relatively infrequent occurrence. Implementation challenges include prompt identification of patients with reversible OHCA causes, preferential transport to an ECPR capable facility and changing the focus of EMS in these select patients from a “stay and play” to a “load and go” mentality.

Abstract P82: Implementation Of New Resuscitation Guidelines Takes One-and-a-half Year

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Berdowski ◽  
Andra Schmohl ◽  
Rudolph W Koster
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
World Wide ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Resuscitation Guidelines ◽  
Rhythm Analysis ◽  
New Guidelines ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective- In November 2005, updated resuscitation guidelines were introduced world-wide, and will be revised again in 2010. This study aims to determine how long it takes to implement new guidelines. Methods- This was a prospective observational study. From July 2005 to January 2008, we included all patients with a non traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ambulance paramedics sent all continuous ECG registrations with impedance signal by modem. We excluded ECGs from patients with Return Of Spontaneous Circulation at arrival, incomplete ECG registrations, ECGs with technical deficits or with continuous chest compressions. The same guidelines needed to be used in over 75% of the registration time in order to be labeled. We classified ECGs as guidelines 2000 if the c:v ratio was 15:2, shock blocks were present and there was rhythm analysis after each shock; guidelines 2005 if the c:v ratio was 30:2, a single shock protocol was used and chest compressions was immediately resumed after shock or rhythm analysis in a no shock scenario. We accepted 10% deviations in the amount of compressions (13–17 for 2000 guidelines, 27–33 for 2005). Results- Of the 1703 analyzable ECGs, we classified 827 (48.6%) as guidelines 2000 and 624 (36.6%) as guidelines 2005. In the remaining 252 ECGs (14.8%) 31 used guidelines 1992, 137 applied guidelines 2000 with c:v ratio of 30:2 and 84 did not show distinguishable guideline usage. Since the introduction in November 2005, it took 17 months to apply new guidelines in over 80% of the cases (figure 1 ). Conclusion- Guideline changes are slowly implemented by professionals. This needs to be taken in consideration when new guideline revisions are considered.

scholarly journals Emergency dispatch process and patient outcome in bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 266-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela V.C. Hiltunen ◽  
Tom O. Silfvast ◽  
T. Helena Jäntti ◽  
Markku J. Kuisma ◽  
Jouni O. Kurola
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

scholarly journals Impact of cooling method on the outcome of initial shockable or non-shockable out of hospital cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management: a nationwide multicentre cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Watanabe ◽  
Tasuku Matsuyama ◽  
Hikaru Oe ◽  
Makoto Sasaki ◽  
Yuki Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Temperature Management ◽  
Target Temperature Management ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Score Analysis ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cooling Methods

Abstract Background Little is known about the effectiveness of surface cooling (SC) and endovascular cooling (EC) on the outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients receiving target temperature management (TTM) according to their initial rhythm. Methods We retrospectively analysed data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest registry, a multicentre, prospective nationwide database in Japan. For our analysis, OHCA patients aged ≥ 18 years who were treated with TTM between June 2014 and December 2017 were included. The primary outcome was 30-day survival with favourable neurological outcome defined as a Glasgow–Pittsburgh cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2. Cooling methods were divided into the following groups: SC (ice packs, fans, air blankets, and surface gel pads) and EC (endovascular catheters and any dialysis technique). We investigated the efficacy of the two categories of cooling methods in two different patient groups divided according to their initially documented rhythm at the scene (shockable or non-shockable) using multivariable logistic regression analysis and propensity score analysis with inverse probability weighting (IPW). Results In the final analysis, 1082 patients were included. Of these, 513 (47.4%) had an initial shockable rhythm and 569 (52.6%) had an initial non-shockable rhythm. The proportion of patients with favourable neurological outcomes in SC and EC was 59.9% vs. 58.3% (264/441 vs. 42/72), and 11.8% (58/490) vs. 21.5% (17/79) in the initial shockable patients and the initial non-shockable patients, respectively. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, differences between the two cooling methods were not observed among the initial shockable patients (adjusted odd ratio [AOR] 1.51, 95% CI 0.76–3.03), while EC was associated with better neurological outcome among the initial non-shockable patients (AOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.19–4.11). This association was constant in propensity score analysis with IPW (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.83–2.36; OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.01–3.47 among the initial shockable and non-shockable patients, respectively). Conclusion We suggested that the use of EC was associated with better neurological outcomes in OHCA patients with initial non-shockable rhythm, but not in those with initial shockable rhythm. A TTM implementation strategy based on initial rhythm may be important.

Abstract 236: Regional Incidence and Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Associated with Overdose

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David D Salcido ◽  
Allison C Koller ◽  
Cesar D Torres ◽  
Aaron M Orkin ◽  
Rob H Schmicker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
North America ◽  
Prescription Drugs ◽  
Regional Variation ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Statistics Canada ◽  
Population Counts ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: The frequency of lethal overdose due to prescription and non-prescription drugs is increasing in North America. The contribution of drug overdose (OD) to regional variation in the incidence and outcome out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is unclear. Objective: To estimate overall and regional variation in incidence and outcomes of emergency medical services (EMS)-treated OD-OHCA cases across North America. Methods: The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) is a clinical research network with 10 regional clinical centers in United States (US) and Canada that uses uniform methods for surveillance of all EMS-treated OHCA in participating regions. Cases of OHCA from 2006 to 2010 were reviewed for evidence of association with or without OD. Incidence of OD-OHCA was calculated as the number of OD-OHCA in a region per 100,000 cumulative person-years, using 2000 US Census and 2006 Statistics Canada population counts. Patient and EMS characteristics as well as outcome were described. Multiple logistic regression was used to describe the association between OD status on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge, while adjusting for case characteristics and consortium center. Results: Included were 56,272 cases of OHCA. Regional incidence of OD-OHCA varied between 0.5 and 2.7 per 100,000 person years (p<0.001), and proportion of OD-OHCA among all EMS-treated OHCA ranged from 0.9% to 3.8%. Table 1 shows outcomes and characteristics stratified by OD status; OD-OHCA were younger, less likely to be witnessed, and less likely to present with a shockable rhythm. Compared to non-OD, OD-OHCA was associated with ROSC (OR: 1.55; 95%CI: 1.35-1.78) and survival (OR: 2.14; 95%CI: 1.72-2.65). Conclusions: OD-OHCA are a small proportion of all OHCA, although incidence varied up to 5-fold across regions. OD-OHCA were more likely to survive than non-OD-OHCA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document