Resting-state functional connectivity in treatment response and resistance in schizophrenia: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 10-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan K. Chan ◽  
Julia Kim ◽  
Parita Shah ◽  
Eric E. Brown ◽  
Eric Plitman ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 153-165
Author(s):  
Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta ◽  
Ferose Azeez Ibrahim ◽  
Manu S. Sharma ◽  
Ganesan Venkatasubramanian ◽  
Jagadisha Thirthalli ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 298-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina K. Syan ◽  
Mara Smith ◽  
Benicio N. Frey ◽  
Raheem Remtulla ◽  
Flavio Kapczinski ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 214 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Andreescu ◽  
Dana L. Tudorascu ◽  
Meryl A. Butters ◽  
Erica Tamburo ◽  
Meenal Patel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seoyeon Kwak ◽  
Minah Kim ◽  
Taekwan Kim ◽  
Yoobin Kwak ◽  
Sanghoon Oh ◽  
...  

Abstract Characterization of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), like other psychiatric disorders, suffers from heterogeneities in its symptoms and therapeutic responses, and identification of more homogeneous subgroups may help to resolve the heterogeneity. We aimed to identify the OCD subgroups based on resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) and to explore their differences in treatment responses via a multivariate approach. From the resting-state functional MRI data of 107 medication-free OCD patients and 110 healthy controls (HCs), we selected rsFC features, which discriminated OCD patients from HCs via support vector machine (SVM) analyses. With the selected brain features, we subdivided OCD patients into subgroups using hierarchical clustering analyses. We identified 35 rsFC features that achieved a high sensitivity (82.74%) and specificity (76.29%) in SVM analyses. The OCD patients were subdivided into two subgroups, which did not show significant differences in their demographic and clinical backgrounds. However, one of the OCD subgroups demonstrated more impaired rsFC that was involved either within the default mode network (DMN) or between DMN brain regions and other network regions. This subgroup also showed both lower improvements in symptom severity in the 16-week follow-up visit and lower responder percentage than the other subgroup. Our results highlight that not only abnormalities within the DMN but also aberrant rsFC between the DMN and other networks may contribute to the treatment response and support the importance of these neurobiological alterations in OCD patients. We suggest that abnormalities in these connectivity may play predictive biomarkers of treatment response, and aid to build more optimal treatment strategies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Taylor ◽  
Hatice Guncu Kurt ◽  
Amit Anand

There are currently no validated treatment biomarkers in psychiatry. Resting State Functional Connectivity (RSFC) is a popular method for investigating the neural correlates of mood disorders, but the breadth of the field makes it difficult to assess progress toward treatment response biomarkers. In this review, we followed general PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the evidence base for mood disorder treatment biomarkers across diagnoses, brain network models, and treatment modalities. We hypothesized that no treatment biomarker would be validated across these domains or with independent datasets. Results are organized, interpreted, and discussed in the context of four popular analytic techniques: (1) reference region (seed-based) analysis, (2) independent component analysis, (3) graph theory analysis, and (4) other methods. Cortico-limbic connectivity is implicated across studies, but there is no single biomarker that spans analyses or that has been replicated in multiple independent datasets. We discuss RSFC limitations and future directions in biomarker development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document