scholarly journals Selenium tolerance, accumulation, localization and speciation in a Cardamine hyperaccumulator and a non-hyperaccumulator

2020 ◽  
Vol 703 ◽  
pp. 135041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eszter Borbála Both ◽  
Gavin C. Stonehouse ◽  
Leonardo Warzea Lima ◽  
Sirine C. Fakra ◽  
Bernadette Aguirre ◽  
...  
1988 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Greenwood ◽  
K. W. Chase

When designers assign tolerances on engineering drawings, they have a significant influence on the resulting cost and producibility of manufactured products. A rational basis for assigning tolerances involves constructing mathematical models of tolerance accumulation in assemblies of parts. However, tolerance stacks in two or three-dimensional problems or other nonlinear assembly functions may distort the resultant assembly tolerances, altering the range and symmetry. An iterative method is described for adjusting the nominal dimensions of the component parts such that the specified assembly limits are not violated.


2013 ◽  
Vol 373-375 ◽  
pp. 2078-2081
Author(s):  
Chun Li Li ◽  
Jian Xin Yang ◽  
Rui Li

Tolerance analysis plays an important role at the stage of product design and has great influences on the assembly quality and manufacturing costs. For each ending point on the functional feature, the displacement transfer relationship is influenced by the clearance between the two parts and the tolerances of each part. With regard to functional tolerance accumulation for the simple assembly, the tolerance analysis of a complex mechanism with three parts is conducted based on the analysis line method. The rules for the functional tolerance analysis process will be summarized in this paper.


Chemosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 252 ◽  
pp. 126471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiquan He ◽  
Yanping Zhao ◽  
Feifei Wang ◽  
Kokyo Oh ◽  
Zhenzhen Zhao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zhengshu Shen ◽  
Gaurav Ameta ◽  
Jami J. Shah ◽  
Joseph K. Davidson

This paper reviews four major methods for tolerance analysis and compares them. The methods discussed are (1) 1D tolerance charts, (2) variational analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation, (3) vector loop (or kinematic) based analysis, and (4) ASU T-Maps© based tolerance analysis. Tolerance charts deal with tolerance analysis in one direction at a time and ignore possible contributions from the other directions. Manual charting is tedious and error-prone, hence attempts have been made for automation. Monte Carlo simulation based tolerance analysis is based on parametric solid modeling; its inherent drawback is that simulation results highly depend on the user-defined modeling scheme, and its inability to obey all Y14.5 rules. The vector loop method uses kinematic joints to model assembly constraints. It is also not fully consistent with Y14.5 standard. ASU T-Maps based tolerance analysis method can model geometric tolerances and their interaction in truly 3-dimensional context. It is completely consistent with Y14.5 standard but its use by designers may be quite challenging. T-Maps based tolerance analysis is still under development. Despite the shortcomings of each of these tolerance analysis methods, each may be used to provide reasonable results under certain circumstances. No guidelines exist for such a purpose. Through a comprehensive comparison of these methods, this paper will develop some guidelines for selecting the best method to use for a given tolerance accumulation problem.


2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (No. 10) ◽  
pp. 441-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.X. Yang ◽  
H. Deng ◽  
M.S. Li

A wide-spread subtropical tree species, <I>Schima superba (Theaceae)</I>, occurring in a Mn mine wasteland, was found to contain unusually high Mn content in the leaf tissues. A pot growth experiment with different Mn treatments was conducted to further illustrate its Mn tolerance, accumulation and relocation capacity. <I>Schima</I> saplings grew well and showed no symptoms of Mn toxicity with Mn supply below 60 mmol/l. Total plant biomass decreased with the increase of Mn supply, but Mn contents in tissues increased significantly, and peaked (62 412.3 mg/kg) in stem at 150 mmol/l treatment. Under all treatments, Mn concentrations in the aboveground tissues were constantly greater than those in roots. When the external Mn supply was over 40 mmol/l, the Mn levels in the leaves and stems all exceeded 10 000 mg/kg, the suggested value for Mn hyperaccumulation. Most of the Mn taken from the substrates were transported to the aboveground tissues, e.g. over 86% accumulated in the aboveground parts at 150 mmol/l treatment. These findings confirmed that Schima superba is a Mn hyperaccumulator.


2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (No. 2) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhu QH ◽  
Huang DY ◽  
Liu SL ◽  
Luo ZC ◽  
Rao ZX ◽  
...  

The tolerance, accumulation and subcellular distribution characteristics of cadmium (Cd) in ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud.) were investigated using a 2-year field experiment. The results indicated that ramie has a certain extent of tolerance to soil Cd (&le; 20 mg/kg) contamination with no significant decrease in shoot biomass and fibre yield relative to control conditions. Although ramie did not hyperaccumulate Cd, it accumulated considerable amount of Cd in the aboveground parts (approximately 0.19 to 1.09 kg/ha annually). The Cd contents retained in ramie tissues were found in order of roots &gt; stems &gt; leaves. Further, regarding the subcellular distribution of Cd in ramie tissues, 80% of the total Cd was bound to the cell walls of the roots and stems, whereas in leaves the proportion of Cd stored in the cell wall fraction was around 60% and a lesser amount of Cd was stored in the soluble fraction (24.1&ndash;25.5%). Our collective results indicated that ramie adapts to Cd stress via the store of a large amount of Cd in cell walls, and suggested potential usefulness of ramie in the phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated farmlands.


Pedosphere ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng-Jie HU ◽  
Yuan-Yuan GAN ◽  
Ye-Tao TANG ◽  
Quan-Fang ZHANG ◽  
Dan JIANG ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zhengshu Shen ◽  
Jami J. Shah ◽  
Joseph K. Davidson

Manual construction of tolerance charts is a popular technique for analyzing tolerance accumulation in parts and assemblies. But this technique has some limitations: (1) it only deals with the worst-case analysis, and not statistical analysis (2) it is time-consuming and errorprone (3) it considers variations in only one direction at a time, i.e. radial or linear. This paper proposes a method to automate 1-D tolerance charting, based on the ASU GD&T global model and to add statistical tolerance analysis functionality to the charting analysis. The automation of tolerance charting involves automation of stackup loop detection, automatic application of the rules for chart construction and determination of the closed form function for statistical analysis. The automated analysis considers both dimensional and geometric tolerances defined as per the ASME Y14.5 – 1994 standard at part and assembly level. The implementation of a prototype charting analysis system is described and two case studies are presented to demonstrate the approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document