Targeting Non-homologous and Alternative End Joining Repair to Enhance Cancer Radiosensitivity

2022 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-41
Author(s):  
Wanjuan Feng ◽  
Chelsea M. Smith ◽  
Dennis A. Simpson ◽  
Gaorav P. Gupta
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suleman S. Hussain ◽  
Rahul Majumdar ◽  
Himanshi Narang ◽  
Erika S. Buechelmaier ◽  
Grace M. Moore ◽  
...  

DNA Repair ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 29-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Moscariello ◽  
Radi Wieloch ◽  
Aya Kurosawa ◽  
Fanghua Li ◽  
Noritaka Adachi ◽  
...  

DNA Repair ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 74-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas R. Pannunzio ◽  
Sicong Li ◽  
Go Watanabe ◽  
Michael R. Lieber

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrence Hanscom ◽  
Mitch McVey

Double-strand breaks are one of the most deleterious DNA lesions. Their repair via error-prone mechanisms can promote mutagenesis, loss of genetic information, and deregulation of the genome. These detrimental outcomes are significant drivers of human diseases, including many cancers. Mutagenic double-strand break repair also facilitates heritable genetic changes that drive organismal adaptation and evolution. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of various error-prone DNA double-strand break repair processes and the cellular conditions that regulate them, with a focus on alternative end joining. We provide examples that illustrate how mutagenic double-strand break repair drives genome diversity and evolution. Finally, we discuss how error-prone break repair can be crucial to the induction and progression of diseases such as cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Ferreira da Silva ◽  
Sejla Salic ◽  
Marc Wiedner ◽  
Paul Datlinger ◽  
Patrick Essletzbichler ◽  
...  

Abstract The mutagenic repair of Cas9 generated breaks is thought to predominantly rely on non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), leading to insertions and deletions within DNA that culminate in gene knock-out (KO). In this study, by taking focused as well as genome-wide approaches, we show that this pathway is dispensable for the repair of such lesions. Genetic ablation of NHEJ is fully compensated for by alternative end joining (alt-EJ), in a POLQ-dependent manner, resulting in a distinct repair signature with larger deletions that may be exploited for large-scale genome editing. Moreover, we show that cells deficient for both NHEJ and alt-EJ were still able to repair CRISPR-mediated DNA double-strand breaks, highlighting how little is yet known about the mechanisms of CRISPR-based genome editing.


Author(s):  
Qiang Pan ◽  
Corinne Petit-Frére ◽  
Aleksi Lähdesmäki ◽  
Hanna Gregorek ◽  
Krystyna H. Chrzanowska ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 2141-2146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Chayot ◽  
Benjamin Montagne ◽  
Didier Mazel ◽  
Miria Ricchetti

Bridging broken DNA ends via nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) contributes to the evolution and stability of eukaryote genomes. Although some bacteria possess a simplified NHEJ mechanism, the human commensal Escherichia coli is thought to rely exclusively on homology-directed mechanisms to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). We show here that laboratory and pathogenic E. coli strains possess a distinct end-joining activity that repairs DSBs and generates genome rearrangements. This mechanism, named alternative end-joining (A-EJ), does not rely on the key NHEJ proteins Ku and Ligase-D which are absent in E. coli. Differently from classical NHEJ, A-EJ is characterized by extensive end-resection largely due to RecBCD, by overwhelming usage of microhomology and extremely rare DNA synthesis. We also show that A-EJ is dependent on the essential Ligase-A and independent on Ligase-B. Importantly, mutagenic repair requires a functional Ligase-A. Although generally mutagenic, accurate A-EJ also occurs and is frequent in some pathogenic bacteria. Furthermore, we show the acquisition of an antibiotic-resistance gene via A-EJ, refuting the notion that bacteria gain exogenous sequences only by recombination-dependent mechanisms. This finding demonstrates that E. coli can integrate unrelated, nonhomologous exogenous sequences by end-joining and it provides an alternative strategy for horizontal gene transfer in the bacterial genome. Thus, A-EJ contributes to bacterial genome evolution and adaptation to environmental challenges. Interestingly, the key features of A-EJ also appear in A-NHEJ, an alternative end-joining mechanism implicated in chromosomal translocations associated with human malignancies, and we propose that this mutagenic repair might have originated in bacteria.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delisa E Clay ◽  
Heidi S Bretscher ◽  
Erin Jezuit ◽  
Korie Bush ◽  
Donald T Fox

Cycling cells must respond to double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Mis-segregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed that Drosophila papillar cells lack DSB checkpoints (as observed in many cancer cells). Here, we show that papillar cells still recruit early-acting repair machinery (Mre11 and RPA3) to DSBs. This machinery persists as foci on DSBs as cells enter mitosis. Repair foci are resolved in a step-wise manner during mitosis. Repair signaling kinetics at DSBs depends on both monoubiquitination of the Fanconi Anemia (FA) protein Fancd2 and the alternative end- joining protein DNA Polymerase Theta. Disruption of either or both of these factors causes micronuclei after DNA damage, which disrupts intestinal organogenesis. This study reveals a mechanism for how cells with inactive DSB checkpoints can respond to DNA damage that persists into mitosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document