Bigger may be better in soil N cycling: Does rapid acquisition of small l-peptides by soil microbes dominate fluxes of protein-derived N in soil?

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 106-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul W. Hill ◽  
Mark Farrell ◽  
Davey L. Jones
2021 ◽  
Vol 770 ◽  
pp. 144730
Author(s):  
Lili Rong ◽  
Xiaohu Wu ◽  
Jun Xu ◽  
Fengshou Dong ◽  
Xingang Liu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina B. Nogueira ◽  
Esther Menéndez ◽  
Martha Helena Ramírez-Bahena ◽  
Encarna Velázquez ◽  
Álvaro Peix ◽  
...  

SOIL ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. van Groenigen ◽  
D. Huygens ◽  
P. Boeckx ◽  
Th. W. Kuyper ◽  
I. M. Lubbers ◽  
...  

Abstract. The study of soil N cycling processes has been, is, and will be at the centre of attention in soil science research. The importance of N as a nutrient for all biota; the ever-increasing rates of its anthropogenic input in terrestrial (agro)ecosystems; its resultant losses to the environment; and the complexity of the biological, physical, and chemical factors that regulate N cycling processes all contribute to the necessity of further understanding, measuring, and altering the soil N cycle. Here, we review important insights with respect to the soil N cycle that have been made over the last decade, and present a personal view on the key challenges of future research. We identify three key challenges with respect to basic N cycling processes producing gaseous emissions: 1. quantifying the importance of nitrifier denitrification and its main controlling factors; 2. characterizing the greenhouse gas mitigation potential and microbiological basis for N2O consumption; 3. characterizing hotspots and hot moments of denitrification Furthermore, we identified a key challenge with respect to modelling: 1. disentangling gross N transformation rates using advanced 15N / 18O tracing models Finally, we propose four key challenges related to how ecological interactions control N cycling processes: 1. linking functional diversity of soil fauna to N cycling processes beyond mineralization; 2. determining the functional relationship between root traits and soil N cycling; 3. characterizing the control that different types of mycorrhizal symbioses exert on N cycling; 4. quantifying the contribution of non-symbiotic pathways to total N fixation fluxes in natural systems We postulate that addressing these challenges will constitute a comprehensive research agenda with respect to the N cycle for the next decade. Such an agenda would help us to meet future challenges on food and energy security, biodiversity conservation, water and air quality, and climate stability.


2020 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 103355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kshitipati Padhan ◽  
Sudeshna Bhattacharjya ◽  
Asha Sahu ◽  
M.C. Manna ◽  
M.P. Sharma ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2247-2256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feike A. Dijkstra ◽  
Gordon L. Hutchinson ◽  
Jean D. Reeder ◽  
Daniel R. LeCain ◽  
Jack A. Morgan

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1027
Author(s):  
Dandan Qi ◽  
Fujuan Feng ◽  
Yanmei Fu ◽  
Ximei Ji ◽  
Xianfa Liu

Microbes, as important regulators of ecosystem processes, play essential roles in ecosystem recovery after disturbances. However, it is not clear how soil microbial communities and functions change and affect forest recovery after clear-cutting. Here, we used metagenome sequencing to systematically analyse the differences in soil microbial community composition, functions, and nitrogen (N) cycling pathways between primary Korean pine forests (PF) and secondary broad-leaved forests (SF) formed after clear-cutting. Our results showed that the dominant phyla of the two forest types were consistent, but the relative abundance of some phyla was significantly different. Meanwhile, at the genus level, the fold-changes of rare genera were larger than the dominant and common genera. The genes related to microbial core metabolic functions, virulence factors, stress response, and defence were significantly enriched in SF. Additionally, based on the relative abundance of functional genes, a schema was proposed to analyse the differences in the whole N cycling processes between the two forest types. In PF, the stronger ammoniation and dissimilatory nitrate reduction (DNRA) and the weaker nitrification provided a genetic explanation for PF dominated by ammonium (NH4+) rather than nitrate (NO3−). In SF, the weaker DNRA, the stronger nitrification and denitrification, the higher soil available phosphorus (AP), and the lower nitrogen to phosphorus ratio (N/P) comprehensively suggested that SF was faced with a greater degree of N limitation. These results offer insights into the potential relationship between soil microbes and forest recovery, and aid in implementing proper forestry management.


2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 749-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Jones ◽  
David Shannon ◽  
Daniel V. Murphy ◽  
John Farrar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document