Multiaxial fatigue assessment of steels with non-metallic inclusions by means of adapted critical plane criteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 102585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Vinícius Sousa Machado ◽  
Lucas Carneiro Araújo ◽  
Marcos Venicius Soares ◽  
Luis Reis ◽  
José Alexander Araújo
2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 969-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Carpinteri ◽  
Andrea Spagnoli ◽  
Sabrina Vantadori

2019 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 16005
Author(s):  
Pedro Vinícius Sousa Machado ◽  
Lucas Carneiro Araújo ◽  
Marcos Venicius Soares ◽  
José Alexander Araújo

The goal of this research is to investigate the detrimental effect of non-metallic inclusions on the fatigue strength of the AISI 4140 steel under multiaxial loading conditions. In order to do so, a multiaxial fatigue model based on the critical plane approach is coupled with Murakami’s √area model. The proposed adaptation is very easy to calibrate and can also account for the higher probability of existing a fatal small defect as the volume of stresses material increases. Experimental multiaxial fatigue data were generated and compared with the estimates provided by the adapted multiaxial fatigue model and with its original version. The errors found are not higher than 10%.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (38) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Leitner ◽  
F. Grun ◽  
Z. Tuncali ◽  
R. Steiner ◽  
W. Chen

2008 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zengliang Gao ◽  
Tianwen Zhao ◽  
Xiaogui Wang ◽  
Yanyao Jiang

Uniaxial, torsion, and axial-torsion fatigue experiments were conducted on a pressure vessel steel, 16MnR, in ambient air. The uniaxial experiments were conducted using solid cylindrical specimens. Axial-torsion experiments employed thin-walled tubular specimens subjected to proportional and nonproportional loading. The true fracture stress and strain were obtained by testing solid shafts under monotonic torsion. Experimental results reveal that the material under investigation does not display significant nonproportional hardening. The material was found to display shear cracking under pure shear loading but tensile cracking under tension-compression loading. Two critical plane multiaxial fatigue criteria, namely, the Fatemi–Socie criterion and the Jiang criterion, were evaluated based on the experimental results. The Fatemi–Socie criterion combines the maximum shear strain amplitude with a consideration of the normal stress on the critical plane. The Jiang criterion makes use of the plastic strain energy on a material plane as the major contributor to the fatigue damage. Both criteria were found to correlate well with the experiments in terms of fatigue life. The predicted cracking directions by the criteria were less satisfactory when comparing with the experimentally observed cracking behavior under different loading conditions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 1252-1264
Author(s):  
Chaoshuai Han ◽  
Kun Liu ◽  
Yongliang Ma ◽  
Peijiang Qin ◽  
Tao Zou

2014 ◽  
Vol 627 ◽  
pp. 425-428
Author(s):  
Dan Jin ◽  
Da Jiang Tian ◽  
Qi Zhou Wu ◽  
Wei Lin

A series of tests for low cycle fatigue were conducted on the tubular specimens for 304 stainless steel under variable amplitude and irregular axial-torsional loading. Rainflow cycle counting and linear damage rule are used to calculate fatigue damage and four approaches, e.g. SWT(Smith-Watson-Topper), KBM(Kandil-Brown-Miller), FS(Fatemi-Socie), and LKN(Lee-Kim-Nam) approach are employed to predict the fatigue life. The maximum shear strain plane, the maximum normal strain plane, and the maximum damage plane are considered as the critical plane, respectively. The effects of the choice of the critical plane on previous approaches are discussed. It is shown that comparing with the maximum shear/normal strain approach, the predictions are improved by using the maximum damage plane approach, part nonproportional paths for SWT, AV and part nonproportional paths for KBM, TV paths for FS. But for LKN, the prediction results are nonconservative for some paths than that of the maximum shear/normal strain approach.


2017 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 282-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Susmel ◽  
D.G. Hattingh ◽  
M.N. James ◽  
R. Tovo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document