Revisiting the foundations of fare evasion research

2020 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 313-324
Author(s):  
Colin Boyd
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 215336872110075
Author(s):  
TaLisa J. Carter ◽  
Lallen T. Johnson

This study demonstrates that racially disparate fare evasion citation outcomes are the product of racialized social systems that allow transit police officers to determine the belongingness of Black riders in systems of mass transit. Using citation data from the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, we test the impact of race and place attributes on transit officer decisions to allocate punishment for subway fare evasion using mixed effects logistic regression controlling for individual and contextual predictors. Although rider racial identity alone proves statistically irrelevant, Black riders suspected of fare evasion possess an elevated risk for being fined as opposed to merely being warned at stations located within predominately white neighborhoods and as stations increase in ridership. These findings demonstrate how transit police officer discretion challenges Black belongingness on systems of public transportation. Broader implications of this work include the importance of scholarship linking statistical disparities to organizational intent and integrating diverse voices in policing policy development.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Barabino ◽  
Cristian Lai ◽  
Alessandro Olivo

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 6543 ◽  
Author(s):  
González ◽  
Busco ◽  
Codocedo

A survey was conducted in July 2018 on the public bus system in Santiago, Chile, in which 457 users were asked to respond to a list of 42 statements expressing a range of attitudes on different aspects of the problem of fare evasion. The respondents were first categorized according to whether they had been observed paying or not paying the fare, and their responses were then subjected to separate cluster analyses that partitioned the respondents into groups according to their views on each survey statement. The analyses identified four distinguishable types or groups among those who did not pay the fare—radical, strategic, ambivalent, and accidental evaders—and three groups among those who did pay—proud, empathetic, and circumstantial evaders. The distinguishing factors motivating the decision to pay or not to pay the fare were found generally to reflect values and attitudes or ideologies but were also influenced by users’ perception of the social acceptability of evasion, the presence of anti-evasion measures, and how “organized” they were in taking care to have a farecard with them when planning to take a bus.


Author(s):  
Christopher Bucknell ◽  
Juan Carlos Muñoz ◽  
Alejandro Schmidt ◽  
Matías Navarro ◽  
Carolina Simonetti

2020 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 307-322
Author(s):  
Marcela A. Munizaga ◽  
Antonio Gschwender ◽  
Nestor Gallegos
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Shize Huang ◽  
Xiaowen Liu ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Guanqun Song ◽  
Zhaoxin Zhang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Cools ◽  
Yannick Fabbro ◽  
Tom Bellemans
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis F. Perrotta

Low-income groups use transit in greater numbers than others. There is little scholarship, however, about how they afford the fare. Using interviews with 25 low-income residents and 15 transportation and social service professionals, this study provides a complex description of fare affordability. It finds that low-income riders are often unable to pay for trips that fulfill daily necessities and discretionary purposes. They manage to travel by evading the fare, exploiting free transfers, forgoing goods, borrowing, and using free fare cards provided by agents of the welfare state. Professionals are largely unaware of the many ways that riders regularly compensate for low funds including the large-scale interventions made by the welfare state into public transportation. Fare evasion enforcement and pricing can pose challenges to low-income riders. By incorporating knowledge on the role that welfare plays in enabling low-income ridership, policy makers can expand access to transit for low-income riders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document