Assessment of influenza vaccine effectiveness in a sentinel surveillance network 2010–13, United States

Introduction Rapid Point of Care Testing (POCT) for influenza could be used to provide information on influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) as well as influencing clinical decision-making in primary care. Methods We undertook a test negative case control study to estimate the overall and age-specific (6 months-17 years, 18–64 years, ≥65 years old) IVE against medically attended POCT-confirmed influenza. The study took place over the winter of 2019–2020 and was nested within twelve general practices that are part of the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC), the English sentinel surveillance network. Results 648 POCT were conducted. 193 (29.7%) of those who were swabbed had received the seasonal influenza vaccine. The crude unadjusted overall IVE was 46.1% (95% CI: 13.9–66.3). After adjusting for confounders the overall IVE was 26.0% (95% CI: 0–65.5). In total 211 patients were prescribed an antimicrobial after swab testing. Given a positive influenza POCT result, the odds ratio (OR) of receiving an antiviral was 21.1 (95%CI: 2.4–182.2, p = <0.01) and the OR of being prescribed an antibiotic was 0.6 (95%CI: 0.4–0.9, p = <0.01). Discussion Using influenza POCT in a primary care sentinel surveillance network to estimate IVE is feasible and provides comparable results to published IVE estimates. A further advantage is that near patient testing of influenza is associated with improvements in appropriate antiviral and antibiotic use. Larger, randomised studies are needed in primary care to see if these trends are still present and to explore their impact on outcomes.

Download Full-text

Interim estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in 2012/13 from Canada’s sentinel surveillance network, January 2013

Eurosurveillance ◽

10.2807/ese.18.05.20394-en ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 18 (5) ◽

Cited By ~ 30

Author(s):

D M Skowronski ◽

N Z Janjua ◽

G De Serres ◽

J A Dickinson ◽

A-L Winter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Influenza Vaccine ◽

Vaccine Effectiveness ◽

Sentinel Surveillance ◽

Surveillance Network ◽

Binary File

Binary file ES_Abstracts_Final_ECDC.txt matches

Download Full-text

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness and Waning Effect in Hospitalized Older Adults. Valencia Region, Spain, 2018/2019 Season

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18031129 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (3) ◽

pp. 1129

Author(s):

Ainara Mira-Iglesias ◽

F. Xavier López-Labrador ◽

Javier García-Rubio ◽

Beatriz Mengual-Chuliá ◽

Miguel Tortajada-Girbés ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Influenza Vaccine ◽

Influenza A ◽

Vaccine Effectiveness ◽

Surveillance Network ◽

Adjuvanted Vaccine ◽

Clinical Registries ◽

Populations At Risk ◽

Influenza A H1n1 ◽

Hospitalized Older Adults

Influenza vaccination is annually recommended for specific populations at risk, such as older adults. We estimated the 2018/2019 influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) overall, by influenza subtype, type of vaccine, and by time elapsed since vaccination among subjects 65 years old or over in a multicenter prospective study in the Valencia Hospital Surveillance Network for the Study of Influenza and other Respiratory Viruses (VAHNSI, Spain). Information about potential confounders was obtained from clinical registries and/or by interviewing patients and vaccination details were only ascertained by registries. A test-negative design was performed in order to estimate IVE. As a result, IVE was estimated at 46% (95% confidence interval (CI): (16%, 66%)), 41% (95% CI: (−34%, 74%)), and 45% (95% CI: (7%, 67%)) against overall influenza, A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2), respectively. An intra-seasonal not relevant waning effect was detected. The IVE for the adjuvanted vaccine in ≥75 years old was 45% (2%, 69%) and for the non-adjuvanted vaccine in 65–74 years old was 59% (−16%, 86%). Thus, our data revealed moderate vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3N2) and not significant against A(H1N1)pdm09. Significant protection was conferred by the adjuvanted vaccine to patients ≥75 years old. Moreover, an intra-seasonal not relevant waning effect was detected, and a not significant IVE decreasing trend was observed over time.

Download Full-text

Influenza vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization in the United States, 2019-2020

The Journal of Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/infdis/jiaa800 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Mark W Tenforde ◽

H Keipp Talbot ◽

Christopher H Trabue ◽

Manjusha Gaglani ◽

Tresa M McNeal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Influenza Vaccine ◽

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Respiratory Illness ◽

The United States ◽

Vaccine Effectiveness ◽

Influenza Viruses ◽

Current Season ◽

Hospital Resources ◽

Negative Controls

Abstract Background Influenza causes significant morbidity and mortality and stresses hospital resources during periods of increased circulation. We evaluated the effectiveness of the 2019-2020 influenza vaccine against influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. Methods We included adults hospitalized with acute respiratory illness at 14 hospitals and tested for influenza viruses by reserve transcription polymerase chain reaction. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated by comparing the odds of current-season influenza vaccination in test-positive influenza cases versus test-negative controls, adjusting for confounders. VE was stratified by age and major circulating influenza types along with A(H1N1)pdm09 genetic subgroups. Results 3116 participants were included, including 18% (553) influenza-positive cases. Median age was 63 years. Sixty-seven percent (2079) received vaccination. Overall adjusted VE against influenza viruses was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27-52). VE against A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses was 40% (95% CI: 24-53) and 33% against B viruses (95% CI: 0-56). Of the two major A(H1N1)pdm09 subgroups (representing 90% of sequenced H1N1 viruses), VE against one group (5A+187A,189E) was 59% (95% CI: 34-75) whereas no significant VE was observed against the other group (5A+156K) [-1%, 95% CI: -61-37]. Conclusions In a primarily older population, influenza vaccination was associated with a 41% reduction in risk of hospitalized influenza illness.

Download Full-text

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During the 2016–2017 Season

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1151 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽

pp. S451-S452

Author(s):

Brendan Flannery ◽

Jessie Chung ◽

Arnold S Monto ◽

Emily T Martin ◽

Edward Belongia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Influenza Vaccine ◽

The United States ◽

Vaccine Effectiveness

Download Full-text

Influenza vaccine effectiveness among patients with high-risk medical conditions in the United States, 2012–2016

Vaccine ◽

10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.093 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (52) ◽

pp. 8047-8053 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Mei Shang ◽

Jessie R. Chung ◽

Michael L. Jackson ◽

Lisa A. Jackson ◽

Arnold S. Monto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

High Risk ◽

Influenza Vaccine ◽

The United States ◽

Vaccine Effectiveness ◽

Medical Conditions

Download Full-text

150. Relative Effectiveness of High-Dose and Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine Against Influenza-Related Hospitalization Among Older Adults—United States, 2015–2017

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofy209.020 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽

pp. S10-S10

Author(s):

Joshua Doyle ◽

Lauren Beacham ◽

Elif Alyanak ◽

Manjusha Gaglani ◽

Emily T Martin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Older Adults ◽

Influenza Vaccine ◽

Influenza A ◽

Standard Dose ◽

Relative Effectiveness ◽

The United States ◽

Vaccine Effectiveness ◽

High Dose ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Seasonal influenza causes substantial morbidity and mortality, and older adults are disproportionately affected. Newer vaccines have been developed for use in people 65 years and older, including a trivalent inactivated vaccine with a 4-fold higher dose of antigen (IIV-HD). In recent years, the use of IIV-HD has increased sufficiently to evaluate its effectiveness compared with standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV-SD). Methods Hospitalized patients with acute respiratory illness were enrolled in an observational vaccine effectiveness study at 8 hospitals in 4 states participating in the United States Hospitalized Adult Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network during the 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 influenza seasons. Predominant influenza A virus subtypes were H1N1 and H3N2, respectively, during these seasons. All enrolled patients were tested for influenza virus with polymerase chain reaction. Receipt and type of influenza vaccine was determined from electronic records and chart review. Odds of laboratory-confirmed influenza were compared among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Relative odds of laboratory-confirmed influenza were determined for patients who received IIV-HD or IIV-SD, and adjusted for potential confounding variables via logistic regression. Results Among 1,744 enrolled patients aged ≥ 65 years, 1,105 (63%) were vaccinated; among those vaccinated, 621 (56%) received IIV-HD and 484 (44%) received IIV-SD. Overall, 315 (18%) tested positive for influenza, including 97 (6%) who received IIV-HD, 86 (5%) who received IIV-SD, and 132 (8%) who were unvaccinated. Controlling for age, race, sex, enrollment site, date of illness, index of comorbidity, and influenza season, the adjusted odds of influenza among patients vaccinated with IIV-HD vs. IIV-SD were 0.72 (P = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.01). Conclusion Comparison of high-dose vs. standard-dose vaccine effectiveness during 2 recent influenza seasons (1 H1N1 and 1 H3N2-predominant) suggested relative benefit (nonsignificant) of high-dose influenza vaccine in protecting against influenza-associated hospitalization among persons aged 65 years and older; additional years of data are needed to confirm this finding. Disclosures H. K. Talbot, sanofi pasteur: Investigator, Research grant. Gilead: Investigator, Research grant. MedImmune: Investigator, Research grant. Vaxinnate: Safety Board, none. Seqirus: Safety Board, none.

Download Full-text

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During the 2016–2017 Season

Clinical Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/cid/ciy775 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 68 (11) ◽

pp. 1798-1806 ◽

Cited By ~ 34

Author(s):

Brendan Flannery ◽

Jessie R Chung ◽

Arnold S Monto ◽

Emily T Martin ◽

Edward A Belongia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Influenza Vaccine ◽

The United States ◽

Vaccine Effectiveness

Download Full-text

2741. Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Timing in Children and Adults Hospitalized with Influenza in the United States, FluSurv-NET, 2013–2017

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2418 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. S964-S965

Author(s):

Julia C Haston ◽

Shikha Garg ◽

Angela P Campbell ◽

Jill Ferdinands ◽

Alissa O’Halloran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Influenza Vaccine ◽

Seasonal Influenza ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Risk Groups ◽

The United States ◽

Vaccine Effectiveness ◽

Chi Square ◽

Surveillance Network ◽

Seasonal Influenza Vaccine ◽

Hispanic Patients

Abstract Background Seasonal influenza vaccine may attenuate disease severity among people infected with influenza despite vaccination, but vaccine effectiveness may decrease with increasing time between vaccination and infection. Patient characteristics may play a role in the timing of vaccine receipt. Methods We used data from the Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET) and included patients ≥ 9 years hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza during October 1–April 30 of influenza seasons 2013–2014 through 2016–2017 who received seasonal influenza vaccine ≥ 14 days prior to admission. Vaccine history was obtained from vaccine registries, medical charts, and patient interviews. We defined “early vaccination” as vaccine receipt before October 15 and “late vaccination” as receipt after (date selected using typical season onset and median vaccination dates). Early and late groups were compared using Chi-square or Fisher exact tests. Results Among 21,751 vaccinated patients, 61% received vaccine before October 15, and distribution of vaccination date was similar across seasons (figure). Vaccination occurred earlier with increasing age (45% were vaccinated early among those 9–17 years but 65% in those ≥ 80 years, P < 0.01). White non-Hispanic patients were more likely to receive vaccine early compared with black non-Hispanic and Hispanic patients (63% vs. 55% and 54%; P < 0.01). Those with metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, and cancer were vaccinated earlier whereas those with HIV and liver disease were vaccinated later. Vaccine timing also varied by state (P < 0.01) but not by sex. Conclusion Among influenza-vaccinated older children and adults hospitalized with influenza, older age, white race, and certain medical conditions were associated with early receipt of influenza vaccination in unadjusted analysis. This may be due to frequent healthcare encounters and targeted public health strategies in high-risk groups. Understanding how timing of vaccine receipt varies among populations can provide insights into variables that must be controlled for in studying possible vaccine effectiveness waning and attenuation of disease among those who are infected despite vaccination. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text