scholarly journals An opportunity to incentivize innovation to increase vaccine safety in the United States by improving vaccine delivery using vaccine patches

Vaccine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (25) ◽  
pp. 4060-4065
Author(s):  
Kimberly M. Thompson ◽  
Walter A. Orenstein ◽  
Alan R. Hinman
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1406-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julianne Gee ◽  
Cindy Weinbaum ◽  
Lakshmi Sukumaran ◽  
Lauri E. Markowitz

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 765-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Chen ◽  
J. W. Glasser ◽  
P. H. Rhodes ◽  
R. L. Davis ◽  
W. E. Barlow ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. e2124502
Author(s):  
Kalyani Sonawane ◽  
Yueh-Yun Lin ◽  
Haluk Damgacioglu ◽  
Yenan Zhu ◽  
Maria E. Fernandez ◽  
...  

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1138
Author(s):  
Rachael Piltch-Loeb ◽  
Nigel Walsh Harriman ◽  
Julia Healey ◽  
Marco Bonetti ◽  
Veronica Toffolutti ◽  
...  

Despite the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine, global vaccination distribution efforts have thus far had varying levels of success. Vaccine hesitancy remains a threat to vaccine uptake. This study has four objectives: (1) describe and compare vaccine hesitancy proportions by country; (2) categorize vaccine-related concerns; (3) rank vaccine-related concerns; and (4) compare vaccine-related concerns by country and hesitancy status in four countries—the United States, Canada, Sweden, and Italy. Using the Pollfish survey platform, we sampled 1000 respondents in Canada, Sweden, and Italy and 750 respondents in the United States between 21–28 May 2021. Results showed vaccine-related concerns varied across three topical areas—vaccine safety and government control, vaccine effectiveness and population control, and freedom. For each thematic area, the top concern was statistically significantly different in each country and among the hesitant and non-hesitant subsamples within each county. Concerns related to freedom were the most universal. Understanding the specific concerns among individuals when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccine can help to inform public communications and identify which, if any, salient narratives are global.


2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 726-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank DeStefano ◽  
Heather Monk Bodenstab ◽  
Paul A Offit

Abstract Concerns about vaccine safety can lead to decreased acceptance of vaccines and resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases. We summarize the key evidence on some of the main current vaccine safety controversies in the United States, including (1) measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and autism; (2) thimerosal, a mercury-based vaccine preservative and the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders; (3) vaccine-induced Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS); (4) vaccine-induced autoimmune diseases; (5) safety of human papillomavirus vaccine; (6) aluminum adjuvant-induced autoimmune diseases and other disorders; and (7) too many vaccines given early in life predisposing children to health and developmental problems. A possible small increased risk of GBS following influenza vaccination has been identified, but the magnitude of the increase is less than the risk of GBS following influenza infection. Otherwise, the biological and epidemiologic evidence does not support any of the reviewed vaccine safety concerns.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth H. Johnson

Abstract The national vaccination effort for novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is among the greatest operational challenges America has ever faced, the success of which depends upon reaching communities across the United States. In this Commentary, the Executive Dean of Ohio University’s Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine (OUHCOM) describes the logistics and processes of vaccine delivery at OUHCOM, both on campus and beyond. Among those logistical considerations is a partnership with the local health department and hospital system, as well as student involvement in vaccination efforts.


Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 901
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Kreps ◽  
Jillian L. Goldfarb ◽  
John S. Brownstein ◽  
Douglas L. Kriner

While mass vaccination has blunted the pandemic in the United States, pockets of vaccine hesitancy remain. Through a nationally representative survey of 1027 adult Americans conducted in February 2021, this study examined individual misconceptions about COVID-19 vaccine safety; the demographic factors associated with these misconceptions; and the relationship between misconceptions and willingness to vaccinate. Misconceptions about vaccine safety were widespread. A sizeable minority (40%) believed that vaccine side effects are commonly severe or somewhat severe; 85% significantly underestimated the size and scale of the clinical trials; and a sizeable share believed either that the vaccines contain live coronavirus (10%) or were unsure (38%), a proxy for fears that vaccination itself may cause infection. These misconceptions were particularly acute among Republicans, Blacks, individuals with lower levels of educational attainment, and unvaccinated individuals. Perceived side effect severity and underestimating the size of the clinical trials were both significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document