Editorial: Challenges on end-of-life battery recycling of electric vehicles

2021 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 327-328
Author(s):  
Seung-Whee Rhee ◽  
Yong-Chul Jang ◽  
Jae Young Kim
Batteries ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Velázquez-Martínez ◽  
Valio ◽  
Santasalo-Aarnio ◽  
Reuter ◽  
Serna-Guerrero

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are currently one of the most important electrochemical energy storage devices, powering electronic mobile devices and electric vehicles alike. However, there is a remarkable difference between their rate of production and rate of recycling. At the end of their lifecycle, only a limited number of LIBs undergo any recycling treatment, with the majority go to landfills or being hoarded in households. Further losses of LIB components occur because the the state-of-the-art LIB recycling processes are limited to components with high economic value, e.g., Co, Cu, Fe, and Al. With the increasing popularity of concepts such as “circular economy” (CE), new LIB recycling systems have been proposed that target a wider spectrum of compounds, thus reducing the environmental impact associated with LIB production. This review work presents a discussion of the current practices and some of the most promising emerging technologies for recycling LIBs. While other authoritative reviews have focused on the description of recycling processes, the aim of the present was is to offer an analysis of recycling technologies from a CE perspective. Consequently, the discussion is based on the ability of each technology to recover every component in LIBs. The gathered data depicted a direct relationship between process complexity and the variety and usability of the recovered fractions. Indeed, only processes employing a combination of mechanical processing, and hydro- and pyrometallurgical steps seemed able to obtain materials suitable for LIB (re)manufacture. On the other hand, processes relying on pyrometallurgical steps are robust, but only capable of recovering metallic components.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lluc Canals Casals ◽  
Beatriz Amante García ◽  
Lázaro V. Cremades

Purpose: On pursue of economic revenue, the second life of electric vehicle batteries is closer to reality. Common electric vehicles reach the end of life when batteries loss between a 20 or 30% of its capacity. However, battery technology is evolving fast and the next generation of electric vehicles will have between 300 and 400 km range. This study will analyze different End of Life scenarios according to battery capacity and their possible second life’s opportunities. Additionally, an analysis of the electric vehicle market will define possible locations for battery repurposing or remanufacturing plants.Design/methodology/approach: Calculating the barycenter of the electric vehicle market offers an optimal location to settle the battery repurposing plant from a logistic and environmental perspective.This paper presents several possible applications and remanufacture processes of EV batteries according to the state of health after their collection, analyzing both the direct reuse of the battery and the module dismantling strategy.Findings: The study presents that Netherlands is the best location for installing a battery repurposing plant because of its closeness to EV manufacturers and the potential European EV markets, observing a strong relation between the EV market share and the income per capita.15% of the batteries may be send back to the an EV as a reposition battery, 60% will be prepared for stationary or high capacity installations such as grid services, residential use, Hybrid trucks or electric boats, and finally, the remaining 25% is to be dismantled into modules or cells for smaller applications, such as bicycles or assisting robots.Originality/value: Most of studies related to the EV battery reuse take for granted that they will all have an 80% of its capacity. This study analyzes and proposes a distribution of battery reception and presents different 2nd life alternatives according to their state of health.


2013 ◽  
Vol 664 ◽  
pp. 358-363
Author(s):  
Yang Gao ◽  
Yu Ke Li ◽  
Song Quan Wu ◽  
Yi Fang Zhu

Now, the renewable resources recycling system do not include the traction battery recycling in China, and there are also some problems in the existed recycling system. In the field of resource recycling, especially for battery recycling, the management system, laws and regulations, and technical standards have been behind of the developed countries. This paper from producers self-establish the recycling system, producers alliance self-establish the recycling system and producers recycling business commission mode to discuss the recycling model for traction battery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 104651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufeng Wu ◽  
Liuyang Yang ◽  
Xi Tian ◽  
Yanmei Li ◽  
Tieyong Zuo

2011 ◽  
Vol 196 (11) ◽  
pp. 5147-5154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Wood ◽  
Marcus Alexander ◽  
Thomas H. Bradley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document