The Denial of Abortion Care Information, Referrals, and Services Undermines Quality Care for U.S. Women

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy A. Weitz ◽  
Susan Berke Fogel
2021 ◽  
pp. 0044118X2110110
Author(s):  
Laura E. Jacobson ◽  
Ana Maria Ramirez ◽  
Chiara Bercu ◽  
Anna Katz ◽  
Caitlin Gerdts ◽  
...  

Young people face social and structural barriers when accessing abortions. High-quality, sexual and reproductive healthcare is needed; however, literature on youth-informed abortion services is limited. This study assesses accounts of youth who obtained an abortion in Argentina, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Nigeria and provides recommendations to improve person-centered aspects of abortion quality. We analyzed 48 semi-structured interviews with clients recruited from clinics, safe abortion hotlines, and patent and proprietary medicine vendors. We coded transcripts and conducted a thematic analysis. The mean age was 21 years (range 16–24), and the majority had a first trimester, medication abortion. Prominent themes included access to information; privacy; stigma associated with age or marital status; the decision-making process; and comfort and rapport with providers. Youth-centered abortion care should anticipate the distinct needs of younger clients. Supportive providers have an important role in offering a non-judgmental service that makes young clients feel comfortable and prepared.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey E. Barnett ◽  
Jeffrey Zimmerman

Documentation and record keeping are not known as the most enjoyable aspects of being a mental health clinician. Yet, as this chapter explains, they play a vital and important role in meeting one’s ethical and legal obligations. Further, it is explained how timely, thorough, effective documentation can help mental health practitioners to fulfill their obligation to provide the highest possible quality of care. Information is also provided on how clinical records may be needed in the future, and the risks associated with minimal or absent documentation. The role of documentation as a risk management strategy, to meet legal requirements, and to assist in providing high-quality care are each addressed. Specific guidance is provided on the needed components of effective documentation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew R Voisin ◽  
Kathy Oliver ◽  
Stuart Farrimond ◽  
Tess Chee ◽  
Jean Arzbaecher ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, thousands of medical procedures and appointments have been canceled or delayed. The long-term effects of these drastic measures on brain tumor patients and caregivers are unknown. The purpose of this study is to better understand how COVID-19 has affected this vulnerable population on a global scale. Methods An online 79-question survey was developed by the International Brain Tumour Alliance, in conjunction with the SNO COVID-19 Task Force. The survey was sent to more than 120 brain tumor charities and not-for-profits worldwide and disseminated to pediatric and adult brain tumor patients and caregivers. Responses were collected from April to May 2020 and subdivided by patient versus caregiver and by geographical region. Results In total, 1989 participants completed the survey from 33 countries, including 1459 patients and 530 caregivers. There were no significant differences in COVID-19 testing rates (P = .662) or positive cases for brain tumor patients between regions (P = .1068). Caregivers were significantly more anxious than patients (P ≤ .0001). Patients from the Americas were most likely to have lost their jobs due to the pandemic, practiced self-isolation, and received telehealth services (P ≤ .0001). Patients from Europe experienced the most treatment delays (P = .0031). Healthcare providers, brain tumor charities, and not-for-profits were ranked as the most trusted sources of information. Conclusions As a result of COVID-19, brain tumor patients and caregivers have experienced significant stress and anxiety. We must continue to provide accessible high-quality care, information, and support in the age of COVID-19.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Whitehouse ◽  
Rebecca Blaylock ◽  
Shelly Makleff ◽  
Patricia Lohr

Background: Quality of care (QOC) is increasingly identified as an important contributor to healthcare outcomes, however little agreement exists on what constitutes quality in abortion care or the recommended indicators from the service-user perspective. Our study aimed to explore perceptions and experiences of abortion QOC in England and Wales.Methods: We performed in-depth interviews (via phone or in-person) with participants who had an abortion at a nationwide independent sector provider in the previous 6 months. We explored their experiences of the abortion service at each point in the care pathway, their perspectives on what contributed to and detracted from the experience meeting their definitions of quality, and their reflections on different aspects of QOC. We used content analysis to generate themes. Results: From December 2018 to July 2019, we conducted 24 interviews. Ten participants had a surgical and 14 had a medical abortion. Seventeen (71%) were treated in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and 7 (29%) beyond that, with an average gestational age of 10 weeks + 5 days (range 5-23 + 6). We identified 4 major themes that contributed to participant’s perception of high quality care: 1) interpersonal interactions with staff or other patients, 2) being informed and prepared, 3) participation and choices in care and 4) accessibility. Nearly all participants identified interpersonal interactions with staff as an important contributor to quality with positive interactions often cited as the best part of their abortion experience and negative interactions as the worst. For information and preparation, participant described not only the importance of being well prepared, but how incongruencies between information and the actual experience detracted from quality. Participants said that making choices about their care, for example, method of abortion, was a positive contributor. Finally, participants identified access to care, specifically in relation to waiting times and travel, as an important aspect of QOC. Conclusions: Participants situated quality in abortion care in 4 domains: interpersonal aspects of care, information and preparation, choices, and accessibility. Indicators identified can be used to develop standard metrics to ensure care meets service-user needs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii22-ii22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew Voisin ◽  
Kathy Oliver ◽  
Stu Farrimond ◽  
Tess Chee ◽  
Gelareh Zadeh ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Since the COVID-19 pandemic, thousands of medical procedures and appointments have been cancelled or delayed. The long-term effects of these drastic measures directly on brain tumour patients and their caregivers are unknown. The purpose of this study is to better understand how COVID-19 has affected this vulnerable population on a global scale. METHODS An online 79-question survey was developed by the IBTA, in conjunction with the SNO COVID-19 Task Force. The survey was sent to over 120 brain tumour charities and not-for-profits worldwide and disseminated to brain tumour patients and caregivers. All responses were subdivided by patient vs caregiver and by geographical region. RESULTS In total, 1989 participants completed the survey from 33 countries, including 1459 patients and 530 caregivers. There were no significant differences in COVID-19 testing rates (p = 0.662) or the number of positive cases for brain tumour patients between regions (p = 0.1068). Caregivers were significantly more anxious than patients (p = < 0.0001). Patients from the Americas were most likely to have lost their jobs due to the pandemic, practiced self-isolation, and received telehealth services (p = < 0.0001). Patients from Europe experienced the most treatment delays (p = 0.0031). Healthcare providers were ranked as the most trusted source of information. CONCLUSIONS As a result of COVID-19, brain tumour patients and caregivers have experienced significant stress and anxiety. Healthcare professionals, brain tumour charities, and not-for-profits must ensure that they continue to provide accessible, high-quality care, information, and support in the age of COVID-19.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine C. Whitehouse ◽  
Rebecca Blaylock ◽  
Shelly Makleff ◽  
Patricia A. Lohr

Abstract Background Quality of care (QOC) is increasingly identified as an important contributor to healthcare outcomes, however little agreement exists on what constitutes quality in abortion care or the recommended indicators from the service-user perspective. Our study aimed to explore perceptions and experiences of abortion QOC in England and Wales. Methods We performed in-depth interviews (via phone or in-person) with participants who had an abortion at a nationwide independent sector provider in the previous 6 months. We explored their experiences of the abortion service at each point in the care pathway, their perspectives on what contributed to and detracted from the experience meeting their definitions of quality, and their reflections on different aspects of QOC. We used content analysis to generate themes. Results From December 2018 to July 2019, we conducted 24 interviews. Ten participants had a surgical and 14 had a medical abortion. Seventeen (71%) were treated in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and 7 (29%) beyond that, with an average gestational age of 10 weeks + 5 days (range 5–23 + 6). We identified 4 major themes that contributed to participant’s perception of high quality care: (1) interpersonal interactions with staff or other patients, (2) being informed and prepared, (3) participation and choices in care and (4) accessibility. Nearly all participants identified interpersonal interactions with staff as an important contributor to quality with positive interactions often cited as the best part of their abortion experience and negative interactions as the worst. For information and preparation, participant described not only the importance of being well prepared, but how incongruencies between information and the actual experience detracted from quality. Participants said that making choices about their care, for example, method of abortion, was a positive contributor. Finally, participants identified access to care, specifically in relation to waiting times and travel, as an important aspect of QOC. Conclusions Participants situated quality in abortion care in 4 domains: interpersonal aspects of care, information and preparation, choices, and accessibility. Indicators identified can be used to develop standard metrics to ensure care meets service-user needs.


2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn H. Oermann ◽  
Jennifer Pasma

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry Mills ◽  
Jennifer Brush

Speech-language pathologists can play a critical role in providing education and intervention to prevent social withdrawal, prevent premature disability, and maximize cognitive functioning in persons with MCI. The purpose of this article is to describe positive, solution-focused educational program that speech-language pathologists can implement with family care partners to improve relationships and provide quality care for someone living with MCI.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 32-33
Author(s):  
Janet McNichol
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document