CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound monitoring in high-risk women cannot prevent the diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.I. Olivier ◽  
M.A.C. Lubsen-Brandsma ◽  
S. Verhoef ◽  
M. van Beurden
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1568-1568
Author(s):  
David Fawunmi ◽  
Helene Gojon ◽  
Antonis Valachis

1568 Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of different screening modalities in detecting ovarian cancer in high-risk women and BRCA 1/2 carriers. Methods: We searched through MEDLINE and ISI Web of Science, with no language or year restriction, to identify studies that used various screening modalities (Ca125, transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) or combination) to detect ovarian cancer in high-risk women and BRCA 1/2 carriers. We summarized the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of each screening modality. Results: Seven studies including BRCA 1/2 carriers and 12 studies including high-risk women were eligible for analysis. The pooled sensitivity of combined Ca125 and TVUS for BRCA 1/2 carriers was 47.6% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 36.6%-58.8%). The pooled sensitivity of combined screening modality for high-risk population was 54% (95% CI: 43%-64-8%). The summary negative likelihood ratio for BRCA 1/2 carriers was 0.6 (95% CI: 0.48 – 0.75). In high-risk population (N = 12398) the rate of advanced stage incident screen-detected cancer was 56% (9 of 16 cancer) which is comparable to the rate of advanced stage in prevalent screening-detected cancer (18 of 32, 56%). In BRCA 1/2 carriers (N = 2356) no difference in stage distribution between incident screen-detected and interval cancer was found (26 of 31 cancer (84%) versus 24 of 27 (89%)). Conclusions: Despite annual combined screening with TVUS and Ca125, a high proportion of ovarian cancer in both BRCA 1/2 carriers and high-risk women are diagnosed in advanced stage. In addition, all screening modalities have an unacceptably low sensitivity. Therefore, it is unlikely that these screening modalities will reduce mortality from ovarian cancer. Further studies are needed to evaluate if more frequently screening more frequently than annually would offer a better chance of early-stage detection.


2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 35.2-35
Author(s):  
K. N. Gaarenstroom ◽  
B. Van Der Hiel ◽  
C. J. Van Asperen ◽  
G. G. Kenter

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (13) ◽  
pp. 1384-1386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Berchuck ◽  
Laura J. Havrilesky ◽  
Noah D. Kauff

Cancers ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaeyeon Kim ◽  
Eun Park ◽  
Olga Kim ◽  
Jeanne Schilder ◽  
Donna Coffey ◽  
...  

High-grade serous ovarian cancer, also known as high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), is the most common and deadliest type of ovarian cancer. HGSC appears to arise from the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum. As most HGSC cases present with widespread peritoneal metastases, it is often not clear where HGSC truly originates. Traditionally, the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) was long believed to be the origin of HGSC. Since the late 1990s, the fallopian tube epithelium has emerged as a potential primary origin of HGSC. Particularly, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), a noninvasive tumor lesion formed preferentially in the distal fallopian tube epithelium, was proposed as a precursor for HGSC. It was hypothesized that STIC lesions would progress, over time, to malignant and metastatic HGSC, arising from the fallopian tube or after implanting on the ovary or peritoneum. Many clinical studies and several mouse models support the fallopian tube STIC origin of HGSC. Current evidence indicates that STIC may serve as a precursor for HGSC in high-risk women carrying germline BRCA1 or 2 mutations. Yet not all STIC lesions appear to progress to clinical HGSCs, nor would all HGSCs arise from STIC lesions, even in high-risk women. Moreover, the clinical importance of STIC remains less clear in women in the general population, in which 85–90% of all HGSCs arise. Recently, increasing attention has been brought to the possibility that many potential precursor or premalignant lesions, though composed of microscopically—and genetically—cancerous cells, do not advance to malignant tumors or lethal malignancies. Hence, rigorous causal evidence would be crucial to establish that STIC is a bona fide premalignant lesion for metastatic HGSC. While not all STICs may transform into malignant tumors, these lesions are clearly associated with increased risk for HGSC. Identification of the molecular characteristics of STICs that predict their malignant potential and clinical behavior would bolster the clinical importance of STIC. Also, as STIC lesions alone cannot account for all HGSCs, other potential cellular origins of HGSC need to be investigated. The fallopian tube stroma in mice, for instance, has been shown to be capable of giving rise to metastatic HGSC, which faithfully recapitulates the clinical behavior and molecular aspect of human HGSC. Elucidating the precise cell(s) of origin of HGSC will be critical for improving the early detection and prevention of ovarian cancer, ultimately reducing ovarian cancer mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document