Response to first-line single agent chemotherapy impacts subsequent response to second-line therapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
N. Jareemit ◽  
N.S. Horowitz ◽  
R.S. Berkowitz ◽  
K.M. Elias
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Subsequent Response ◽  
Single Agent Chemotherapy

Intravenous vinorelbine as first-line and second-line therapy in advanced breast cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2722-2730 ◽  
Author(s):  
B L Weber ◽  
C Vogel ◽  
S Jones ◽  
H Harvey ◽  
L Hutchins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

PURPOSE We evaluated single-agent intravenous (IV) vinorelbine as first- and second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC) in patients who were not resistant to anthracyclines. Objective tumor response (TR) and toxicity were assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 107 women were enrolled onto this multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label phase II study. Patients were stratified into first- and second-line treatment groups, based on prior treatment history. Vinorelbine was initially given at 30 mg/m2/wk, with dose modification for toxicity as indicated. Therapy was continued until disease progression or severe toxicity mandated withdrawal or until the patient asked to be removed from the study. RESULTS The objective response rate for all patients was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 44%): 35% (95% CI, 23% to 48%) for first-line patients and 32% (95% CI, 20% to 47%) for second-line patients. Nine first-line and three second-line patients obtained a complete response (CR). The median duration of objective response was 34 weeks in both groups. The overall survival durations of first- and second-line patients were 67 weeks and 62 weeks, respectively. Granulocytopenia was the predominant dose-limiting toxicity. Two patients died on study as a result of granulocytopenic sepsis. CONCLUSION Single-agent vinorelbine is an effective and well-tolerated agent for first- and second-line therapy of ABC. The results of this study confirm the findings of similar international trials and suggest vinorelbine should be considered a valid treatment option for patients with ABC and a potential component in future combination regimens for this disease.

A phase II study of single agent abraxane as second-line therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16058-e16058
Author(s):  
S. S. Sridhar ◽  
C. M. Canil ◽  
A. Eisen ◽  
I. F. Tannock ◽  
J. J. Knox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Cancer Setting

e16058 Background: Metastatic urothelial cancer progressing on or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy is incurable and has a very poor prognosis. There is no standard second-line therapy, but the taxanes including paclitaxel, have previously shown activity. Abraxane (ABI-007) is a novel well tolerated albumin-bound nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel. The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of single agent Abraxane in the second-line metastatic urothelial cancer setting. Methods: Patients with measureable metastatic urothelial cancer, who progressed on or after first-line cisplatin based chemotherapy were enrolled onto this phase II, two-stage multicenter trial. Patients received Abraxane 260 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Clinical evaluation, CBC and blood chemistries were performed every cycle and restaging CT scans every 2 cycles. Results: Fourteen patients have been enrolled to date. Patient demographics: M: F 12:2; mean age 64 (range 45–80); ECOG 0:1:2 4:5:5. A total of 57 cycles, avg 4 cycles/ patient (range 1–9) have been administered. There were three dose delays due to neuropathy, pain, and low neutrophil count respectively. There were two dose reductions due to fatigue and neuropathy. Most frequent adverse events (AE) were fatigue, alopecia, anorexia, cough and joint pain; the most frequent grade 3+ AE were fatigue, joint pain, hypertension, joint stiffness and back pain. Fourteen patients are currently evaluable for best response using RECIST criteria. There have been 5 partial responses (PR), 5 stable disease (SD) and 4 progressive disease (PD). Conclusions: Single agent Abraxane was well tolerated in the 2nd line, cisplatin refractory/resistant metastatic urothelial cancer setting. Preliminary efficacy results are encouraging with a clinical benefit rate of 71% (10 out of 14 evaluable pts having either SD or PR). Stage 1 response criteria have been met and accrual is ongoing to a total of 48 patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Second-line therapy with pemetrexed after gemcitabine failure in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: A multicenter phase II trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4124-4124 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Boeck ◽  
K. Weigang-Koehler ◽  
M. Fuchs ◽  
E. Kettner ◽  
D. Quietzsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

4124 Background: There is no established second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer after failure of standard first-line treatment with gemcitabine. In view of the urgent need of such therapy and the observation of clinically meaningful responses with pemetrexed in previously untreated pancreatic cancer, this phase II study evaluated pemetrexed as second-line therapy. Methods: This study was planned to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in 54 patients (pts) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (stage II-IV), ECOG performance status ≤2 and estimated life expectancy of ≥12 weeks (wks) after failure of first-line gemcitabine single agent or combination therapy. Pemetrexed was started at 500 mg/m2 q3w (10 min infusion), with vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation. Dose escalation by 100 mg/m2 every other cycle and an unlimited number of cycles were allowed. Primary endpoint was the 3-month survival rate. Results: A total of 189 treatment cycles (median 2, range 1–20) was given to 52 pts (60% male, median age 63 yrs, median time since initial diagnosis 32 wks, 89% stage IV disease). Doses were escalated in 2 pts (4%) and reduced due to toxicity in 9 pts (17%); median dose per cycle was 500 mg/m2 (range 212–700 mg/m2). The 3-month survival rate was 75% (95% CI 63.2–86.8%). At a median follow-up of 20 wks, the median overall survival estimate was 20 wks, with 9 pts alive including 1 still on pemetrexed. Median TTP was 7 wks (range 1–62 wks). The overall response rate was 3.8% (0 CR, 2 PR); 12 pts (23%) had SD for ≥6 wks, 9 of them for ≥12 wks. CA 19–9 decreased at least once by ≥ 50% in 12 pts (23%). Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity rates per pt were as follows: neutropenia 17.3% (febrile neutopenia: 3.8%), leukopenia 15.4%, thrombopenia 5.8% and anemia 3.8%. Conclusion: Pemetrexed is a feasible option for second-line therapy with mild toxicity and encouraging activity in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure. [Table: see text]

Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin as second-line therapy of advanced and metastatic NSCLC

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18157-18157
Author(s):  
A. J. Alencar ◽  
M. Blaya ◽  
L. Raez ◽  
N. Farfan ◽  
G. Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organ Failure ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Multi Organ Failure

18157 Background: Single agent gemcitabine is active as second line therapy in NSCLC. Oxaliplatin may be non-cross resistant with the other platinum-containing agents used as first-line therapy in NSCLC. The combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) is synergistic in pre-clinical models. Methods: A phase II, non-randomized trial was designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 over 100 min in combination with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 over 2 hours both given on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Patients with NSCLC were eligible if they had progressed after first line treatment. Primary endpoint was tumor response rate. Planned sample size is 30 patients over a period of 2 years. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Lung (FACT-L) v.4 questionaire was used to assess quality of life of patients on therapy. Results: Twenty-two patients have been enrolled. 13 males (59%) and 9 females (41%). 15 Hispanic (68%), 4 Caucasian (18%), and 3 African-American (13%). Median age is 55 yrs. Histologic subtypes are as follows: adenocarcinoma, 12; NSCLC not otherwise specified 7; squamous cell carcinoma, 3. Nine patients had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 (41%) and 13 had a PS of 1 (59%). Two patients were never smokers. A total of 56 cycles have been administered (median 2, range 1 to 6). GEMOX as second-line therapy was given to 18 patients (81%), third-line to 4 patients (18%). Two patients died on study from disease progression leading to respiratory and multi-organ failure. The following Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were seen in 2 patients each: fatigue, dyspnea, anemia, and multi-organ failure. Cancer pain was seen in 1 patient. Twenty patients are available for assessment of response. Two patients had a confirmed partial response (10%) and another eight had stable disease (40%). Preliminary results of FACT-L analysis in 19 pts shows improvement in Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) score in 25% of the patients after 2 cycles of therapy. Conclusions: Combination gemcitabine and oxaliplatin is active and well tolerated as second line treatment for NSCLC. Improvement of LCS score after 2 cycles suggests a clinical benefit that is beyond the observed response rate of 10%. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A multi-center phase Ib/II study of nal-irinotecan, 5-fluouracil and leucovorin in combination with nivolumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced unresectable biliary tract cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4154-TPS4154
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Sahai ◽  
Tyler Howard Buckley ◽  
Kent A. Griffith ◽  
Mark Zalupski
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cell Subset ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Line Therapy

TPS4154 Background: Patients (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) have poor prognosis despite systemic chemotherapy, and treatment beyond first-line platinum doublet remains investigational. The immunomodulatory properties of conventional cytotoxic therapy, particularly in regard to the upregulation of PD-L1 expression rendering tumor cells more sensitive to T cell-mediated lysis and neoantigen production, rapid emergence of chemotherapy resistance, and known modest efficacy of single agent PD-1 antibody in BTC provide a rationale for combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This multi-center, phase Ib/II, single-arm study is designed to investigate the role of nal-irinotecan, 5-FU and leucovorin in combination with nivolumab as second-line therapy in pts with advanced BTC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed advanced, unresectable biliary carcinoma (intra- or extra-hepatic and gallbladder) with progression or intolerance of first-line systemic therapy (excluding irinotecan and PD-1/PD-L1 antibody), measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS 0-1, Child Pugh A or B7, and absence of autoimmune disease or chronic steroid use. Primary objective of the phase Ib portion is to determine the recommended phase 2 dose, and of the phase II portion is to evaluate the median progression-free survival. Secondary objectives include evaluation of objective response rate per immune related (ir)RECIST, median OS and safety in this patient population. Exploratory objectives include identification of biomarker predictors of response and mechanisms of resistance through serial biopsies and blood collection (pre, on and post therapy), including sequential whole exome/transcriptomic analysis and immune cell subset analysis (tissue and blood). Therapy includes nal-irinotecan 70 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 (dose level -1) or 400 mg/m2 (dose level 0), 5-fluouracil 2400 mg/m2 IV over 46 hours, and nivolumab 240 mg on day 1 every 2 weeks for 6 months. In the absence of disease progression, pts may continue therapy for up to 2 years. Accrual goal is 30 evaluable pts. Using a null hypothesis value of median PFS of 2.9 months, and an alternative hypothesis of 5.0 months, this ongoing study has > 80% power, with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 to identify treatment efficacy of study arm. Clinical trial information: NCT03785873.

Esophageal Cancer: A Critical Evaluation of Systemic Second-Line Therapy

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (35) ◽  
pp. 4709-4714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Maria Rosina Thallinger ◽  
Markus Raderer ◽  
Michael Hejna
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Critical Evaluation ◽  
Individual Therapy ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

The objective of this article was to review clinical trials that used antineoplastic second-line chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies in patients with esophageal cancer after first-line therapy. Computerized (MEDLINE) and manual searches were performed to identify articles published on this topic between 1996 and 2011. Twenty-five published trials and four abstracts presented at scientific meetings were identified. A total of 10 trials included only patients with squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), four focused exclusively on adenocarcinoma (AC), the remaining 15 studies included both SCC and AC. The majority of trials (17 of 29) used docetaxel in combination with platinum analogs, eight used single-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy, and six evaluated targeted therapies. The numbers of patients were relatively small, ranging from eight to 55 patients. The response rates were generally low (between 0% and 39%), with only two small studies reporting objective responses of 50% and 63%, respectively. Time to progression ranged from 1.4 to 6.2 months, and the overall survival was disappointing at 4.0 to 11.4 months. Approximately 40% of patients who experience progressive disease after first-line chemotherapy are able to undergo second-line treatment. On the basis of data published so far, no standard second-line therapy has emerged. Future research will need to focus on individual therapy strategies such as genetic receptor mutations to increase the therapeutic outcome.

Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in metastatic melanoma (MM) patients (pts) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A single institution study of 696 pts.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9574-9574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Ann McKean ◽  
Lauren Elaine Haydu ◽  
Junsheng Ma ◽  
Roland L. Bassett ◽  
Wen-Jen Hwu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Therapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

9574 Background: Limited OS data, including prognostic and predictive factors of response, is available in mm pts treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was conducted on 696 mm pts treated with single-agent anti CTLA-4 or anti PD-1 on and off clinical trial between 2011-2015. Median OS was calculated from mm diagnosis. Results:Median age at mm diagnosis was 60 years old (range 15-86) and 65.2% were male. Subtypes were 63.2% non-acral cutaneous, 17.2% unknown primary, 7.8% mucosal, 6.5% acral, and 5.3% uveal. AJCC v7 staging at diagnosis was 7.9% M1a, 16.5% M1b, 33.0% M1c, and 42.5% not staged due to unknown LDH. LDH was elevated in 18.0% (400 pts). Mutation rates were 30.0% BRAF V600E/K (636 pts tested) and 24.5% NRAS (429 pts tested). First-line therapy for BRAF V600E/K mm pts included anti CTLA-4 (24.1%), BRAF/MEK targeted therapy (21.5%) and anti PD-1 (8.9%). First-line therapy for BRAF WT mm pts included anti CTLA-4 (28.1%) and anti PD-1 (12.8%). Median OS from mm for the cohort was 36.5 months (95% CI 33.3-44.9). Elevated LDH and staging correlated with OS (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively) on univariate analysis. Age, gender, subtype and mutation status were not significantly associated with OS. Compared to BRAF WT, pts with BRAF V600E/K mutation were younger (median = 53 vs 62 yrs, p < 0.001), more likely to have non-acral cutaneous mm (83.2% vs 58.0%, p < 0.001) and have a diagnosis of brain metastasis during the disease course (57.0% vs 28.8%, p < 0.001). While adjusting for stage, there was no significant difference in OS based on first or second line therapy in pts with BRAF V600E/K mm or first line therapy in BRAF WT MM; however, BRAF WT pts treated second line with anti-PD1 were observed to have improved OS compared with pts receiving anti-CTLA 4 (HR 0.43 95% CI:0.23-0.84 p = 0.012). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that LDH and stage are prognostic of OS in all mm pts treated with single agent immune therapy. Second line therapy in BRAF WT pts treated with single agent immune therapy is also prognostic of OS thus prompting further investigation to determine advantageous therapy sequencing in MM.

Outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving second line chemotherapy in Marmara University Hospital

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14588-14588
Author(s):  
F. Dane ◽  
M. Gumus ◽  
A. Ozturk ◽  
F. Yumuk ◽  
S. Iyikesici ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

14588 Background: With the development of oxaliplatin and irinotecan, multiple effective regimens are now available in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), both as first- and second-line treatment options. Exposure to all of the active drugs is effective in prolonging overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). There are limited studies, if any, analyzing the outcome of second line chemotherapy in metastatic CRC in Turkey. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the outcome of second-line treatments in metastatic CRC patients. Methods: Among 173 patients with metastatic CRC who were given first line chemotherapy 106 (47 female, 59 male) were administered second line treatment after progression. All patients histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma with ECOG performance score of 2 or lower, and received second line therapy for metastatic CRC after experienced disease progression during or following treatment with first-line therapy were entered the study. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically after each three-cycle period, and chemotherapy was changed or stopped if the cancer has progressed. Age, gender, grade, chemotherapy type (combination vs single agent), lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion, were analyzed as prognostic factors. Results: At a median follow up of 10 (range 1–40) months from the start of second line chemotherapy median TTP and OS time were 5 and 16 months respectively. Median age was 62 years (range 27–89). After second line therapy 16% of the patient had objective response rate (0.9% complete responses plus 15.1% partial responses), 37.7% had stable disease resulting in a tumor control rate of 53.7%, and 46.2% had progressive disease. One-year progression free survival and OS rates were 15 % and 53.5%, respectively. No difference was seen in the survival of patients received combination or single agent second line chemotherapy (p=0.14). Overall, over 12% of the patients suffered from grade 3 or 4 adverse effects. In multivariate analysis histological grade (p=0.015) was the only independent prognostic factor for survival. Conclusion: The survival outcome and adverse effects of second line treatments in Turkish patients in our department with metastatic CRC is consistent with the worlds’ literature. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document