Subjective Studies of the Blind Spot and Visual Fields

1936 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Jackson
Keyword(s):  
1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1103-1113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidehiko Komatsu ◽  
Ikuya Murakami

AbstractIn human subjects, the blind spot is perceptually filled-in by color and brightness from the surrounding visual field. The present behavioral study examined the occurrence of color filling-in at the blind spot in monkeys. First, the location of the blind spot was determined using a monocular saccade task. The blind spots were located on the horizontal meridian at approximately 15–17 deg from the fixation point in the temporal visual field. Then, filling-in at the blind spot was tested by determining if the monkey could discriminate between an annulus presented on the blind spot and a homogeneous disk in the normal visual field. In this task, the monkey was required to make a saccade to a homogeneous disk of the same color and size as an annulus presented simultaneously in the opposite field. Both stimuli were large enough to cover the blind spot and the inner circle of the annulus was confined inside the blind spot. All four monkeys tested performed this task correctly in over 80% of the trials. However, when one eye was covered and the annulus was presented on the blind spot of the uncovered eye, performance deteriorated significantly. To confirm that these results reflected filling-in, one monkey was trained to maintain fixation when two identical homogeneous disks appeared in opposite visual fields. When only one eye was uncovered, and the annulus was presented on the blind spot of the uncovered eye, the monkey maintained fixation in most of the trials. These results show that monkeys were unable to distinguish an annulus from a homogeneous disk when the annulus was presented on the blind spot. This indicates that color filling-in occurs at the blind spot in monkeys and opens possibility to physiological experiments to study the neural mechanisms of filling-in.


Diversity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 400
Author(s):  
Simon Potier

Ecological diversity among diurnal birds of prey, or raptors, is highlighted regarding their sensory abilities. While raptors are believed to forage primarily using sight, the sensory demands of scavengers and predators differ, as reflected in their visual systems. Here, I have reviewed the visual specialisations of predatory and scavenging diurnal raptors, focusing on (1) the anatomy of the eye and (2) the use of vision in foraging. Predators have larger eyes than scavengers relative to their body mass, potentially highlighting the higher importance of vision in these species. Scavengers possess one centrally positioned fovea that allows for the detection of carrion at a distance. In addition to the central fovea, predators have a second, temporally positioned fovea that views the frontal visual field, possibly for prey capture. Spatial resolution does not differ between predators and scavengers. In contrast, the organisation of the visual fields reflects important divergences, with enhanced binocularity in predators opposed to an enlarged field of view in scavengers. Predators also have a larger blind spot above the head. The diversity of visual system specializations according to the foraging ecology displayed by these birds suggests a complex interplay between visual anatomy and ecology, often unrelatedly of phylogeny.


1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H. Meyer ◽  
M. Guhlmann ◽  
J. Funk

Purpose We investigated whether the blind spot is larger in early “preperimetric” glaucoma with already deeply excavated optic discs than in normal persons. Methods We examined eight eyes of five patients with definite glaucomatous optic disc cupping but normal visual fields. Ten eyes of five normal healthy volunteers, with normal central excavation, served as controls. With SLO-perimetry we measured the differential light sensitivity 0.5-1.0° outside the disc margins, “within” the center (Goldmann V stimulus) and along the horizontal meridian of the optic discs. Optic disc topography was documented with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT). Results Differential light sensitivities adjacent to the optic discs did not differ in the two groups (normal 8.3dB, early glaucoma 8.4dB). Goldmann IV stimuli presented on the horizontal meridian of optic discs with glaucomatous cupping were seen up to 0.7° centrally (i.e., towards the center) of the disc margin. In the control group this distance was significantly greater (1.3°). The light differential thresholds with stimulus presentation in the disc center (Goldmann V) were significantly higher in the glaucoma group (0±2.8dB) than in the normal controls (6.6±1.3dB), though disc size was the same in both groups. Conclusions Blind spots of normal discs seem to be smaller than those of deeply excavated discs in eyes with early glaucoma, possibly because there is more light scattering by the normal disc surface towards the adjacent functioning retina.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Iester ◽  
Fabio De Feo ◽  
Gordon R. Douglas

Purpose. To determine whether the patterns of visual field damage between high-tension glaucoma (HTG) and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) are equivalent.Methods. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, fifty-one NTG and 57 HTG patients were recruited. For each recruited patient only the left eye was chosen. Glaucomatous patients had abnormal visual fields and/or glaucomatous changes at the optic nerve head. They were classified as HTG or NTG on the basis of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements. Patients' visual fields were analyzed by using Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), program 30-2, full threshold. The visual field sensitivity values and the pattern deviation map values of the 72 tested points were considered. Then a pointwise analysis and an area analysis, based on the Glaucoma Hemifield test criteria, were performed, and a comparison between the two subgroups was made by Student’sttest.Results. Between NTG and HTG, no significant difference was found pointwise for almost all the visual field points, except for two locations. One was under the blind spot, and the other was in the inferior hemifield around the twenty-degree position. When area analysis was considered, three areas showed a significantly different sensitivity between HTG and NTG.Conclusions. These data suggested that there was no relevant difference in the pointwise analysis between NTG and HTG; however, when visual field areas were compared, no difference in paracentral areas was found between NTG and HTG, but superior nasal step and inferior and superior scotomata showed to be deeper in HTG than in NTG.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A569-A569
Author(s):  
Joseph Raco ◽  
Maria Macias ◽  
Rohit Jain

Abstract Background: Hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus commonly manifests as symptoms of polyuria, polydipsia, fatigue, and weight loss as a result of insulin resistance. In cases of severe hyperglycemia, patients may also experience visual disturbances and dizziness as a result of swelling of the lens and dehydration respectively. These symptoms are not generally accompanied by gait disturbance or fixed, focal deficits on neurological examination. As such, symptoms such as double vision, peripheral field vision loss, cranial nerve deficits, or significant unsteadiness may warrant a more extensive neurologic workup rather than simply attributing all symptoms to hyperglycemia. Clinical Case: A 57-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with five days of fatigue, polyuria, polydipsia and pre-syncope associated with dizziness. She also described double vision in her peripheral visual fields and episodes of gait disturbances causing her to have to lower herself to the ground on multiple occasions, without loss of consciousness. Her neurologic examination demonstrated mildly ataxic finger-to-nose testing and concern for peripheral field vision loss. Intake lab work revealed a blood glucose of 725 mg/dL and a hemoglobin A1C of 13.4%. Initial neuroimaging with computed tomography was unremarkable. Though her symptoms were thought to be due to severe hyperglycemia, an MRI brain was obtained due to abnormal neurologic examination. MRI demonstrated a 1.9 cm pituitary macroadenoma abutting the optic chiasm with concern for hemorrhage. Subsequent lab evaluation determined the pituitary macroadenoma non-functional with TSH, free T4, free T3, AM cortisol, AM ACTH, and prolactin all within normal limits. Her hyperglycemia was treated with insulin with clinical improvement in all regards except visual symptoms. She was deemed safe for discharge with neurosurgical follow-up regarding surgical removal of her macroadenoma. Conclusion: Although hyperglycemia may present with broad symptoms including vague neurologic symptoms, it is critical to keep a broad differential diagnosis when atypical symptoms such as persistent vision changes and gait disturbances are present, especially after improvement in glycemic control has been obtained. A low threshold should be held for obtaining neuroimaging, as it is prudent to rule-out life-threatening causes of neurologic dysfunction.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  

Purpose: We report a case of a patient with bilateral papilledema and Benign Intracranial Hypertension caused by uncontrolled use of drugs for self-treatment of obesity. Methods: A 36-year-old, mildly obese female with a 7-month history of visual changes with floaters, intermittent episodes of diplopia and blurred vision, intense, debilitating, daily headaches, pulsatile tinnitus, bilateral maxillary pressure and pain. Fundus examination revealed papilledema, visual field test detects blind spot enlargement, generalized constriction, and loss of the nasal visual fields, optical coherence tomography (OCT) - increased RNFL thickness in all four quadrants, Lumbar puncture- Increased Intracranial Pressure. Results: The diagnosis of IIH we made according modified Dandy criteria. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first report in literature of BIH caused after self-medication of overweight. Patient during a year lose 40 kg, and she manage it by uncontrolled use of drugs for weight loss.


1975 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 641-642
Author(s):  
JUDITH LONG LAWS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document