A Methodology for an Integrated Design and Process Planning Based on a Concurrent Engineering Reference Model

CIRP Annals ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 403-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Eversheim ◽  
H. Rozenfeld ◽  
W. Bochtler ◽  
R. Graessler
Author(s):  
Dennis E. Barbeau

This paper describes the status and potential for a fast time-to-market concurrent engineering process. The principles have been developed by the author over a 25 year learning process and used effectively on a variety of programs. Fast CE™ is fundamentally predicated on integration of the manufacturing and engineering processes at the conceptual design phase. Commencement at this early date is critical — 80 to 90% of the inherent production unit cost is locked in place during this process. Subsequent to development of an integrated design strategy, both producibility and functional product development evolve in parallel using a “model-centric” approach to maintain the integrity of all elements of the program. Fast CE™ not only eliminates the use of drawings, it requires that they not be used in any capacity except as a convenience reference. This provides tight control over a common data base that directly links all of the activities necessary to design and produce a product. The result is a significant reduction in cost and schedule, with gains in all of the processes required to bring a product to market. Drawing elimination in itself can amount to a savings of as much as one third of the total design cost. The activities previously supported by drawings — quality assurance, for example — are managed through simpler, more functionally oriented processes. The author describes the elements of Fast CE™ and the radical changes required in certain areas. Historical background traces development of the processes, providing perspective on the strategies and the issues faced and overcome, and leading to the issues currently faced in attainment of its full potential. The cost and schedule gains identified require cultural as well as operational changes. The more radical of these changes present a management challenge to any organization intent on gaining the full spectrum of benefits.


CIRP Annals ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 545-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen Herman ◽  
Mark Lawley ◽  
Stephen C.-Y. Lu ◽  
David Mattox

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaw C. Feng ◽  
Paul Witherell ◽  
Gaurav Ameta ◽  
Duck Bong Kim

Purpose Additive manufacturing (AM) processes are the integration of many different science and engineering-related disciplines, such as material metrology, design, process planning, in-situ and off-line measurements and controls. Major integration challenges arise because of the increasing complexity of AM systems and a lack of support among vendors for interoperability. The result is that data cannot be readily shared among the components of that system. In an attempt to better homogenization this data, this paper aims to provide a reference model for data sharing of the activities to be under-taken in the AM process, laser-based powder bed fusion (PBF). Design/methodology/approach The activity model identifies requirements for developing a process data model. The authors’ approach begins by formally decomposing the PBF processes using an activity-modeling methodology. The resulting activity model is a means to structure process-related PBF data and align that data with specific PBF sub-processes. Findings This model in this paper provides the means to understand the organization of process activities and sub-activities and the flows among them in AM PBF processes. Research limitations/implications The model is for modeling AM activities and data associated with these activity. Data modeling is not included in this work. Social implications After modeling the selected PBF process and its sub-processes as activities, the authors discuss requirements for developing the development of more advanced process data models. Such models will provide a common terminology and new process knowledge that improve data management from various stages in AM. Originality/value Fundamental challenges in sharing/reusing data among heterogeneous systems include the lack of common data structures, vocabulary management systems and data interoperability methods. In this paper, the authors investigate these challenges specifically as they relate to process information for PBF – how it is captured, represented, stored and accessed. To do this, they focus on using methodical, information-modeling techniques in the context of design, process planning, fabrication, inspection and quality control.


Author(s):  
Raj Selladurai ◽  
George VandeWerken

This chapter focuses on the recent Southwest states' multi-state planning collaborative study, which the Federal Railroad Administration initiated, coordinated, and released in 2015. It highlights the process, planning contextual factors, conclusions, recommendations, and implications, which may serve as a reference model for future studies in other regions of the U.S. The chapter also looks at the momentum of high-speed rail in the U.S., especially in California, and explores some of the considerations in moving toward more optimal and comprehensive transportation planning and policy development for high-speed rail for the U.S. in the future.


Author(s):  
Shaw C. Feng ◽  
Walter W. Nederbragt ◽  
Serge Kaing ◽  
Ram D. Sriram

Abstract This paper describes recent developments in the Design and Process Planning Integration (DPPI) project at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The project addresses the need for improved communication between design and process planning in the early product design stage. Since major manufacturing costs are committed during product specification and design, it is critical to successfully assess manufacturability and cost as early as possible in the design process. Documenting the DPPI foundation, this paper reviews industry needs for an integrated design and manufacturing environment for rapid product development. Additionally, this paper describes the project’s approach and the current status. Conceptual design and process planning prototype systems, that have been implemented, are also described. Finally, it describes the future direction for developing mechanisms to enable the integration of design and process planning, including information models and language interface specifications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document