Accuracy of Different Criteria for Lymph Node Staging in Rectal Cancer by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S1232
Author(s):  
Florian Loch ◽  
Matthias Taupitz ◽  
Christoph Schmidt ◽  
Joern Groene ◽  
Martin E. Kreis
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörn Gröne ◽  
Florian N. Loch ◽  
Matthias Taupitz ◽  
C. Schmidt ◽  
Martin E. Kreis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zixuan Zhuang ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Mingtian Wei ◽  
Xuyang Yang ◽  
Ziqiang Wang

BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based lymph node staging remains a significant challenge in the treatment of rectal cancer. Pretreatment evaluation of lymph node metastasis guides the formulation of treatment plans. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI in lymph node staging using various morphological criteria.MethodsA systematic search of the EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases was performed. Original articles published between 2000 and January 2021 that used MRI for lymph node staging in rectal cancer were eligible. The included studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate random-effects model was used to conduct a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.ResultsThirty-seven studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of preoperative MRI for the lymph node stage were 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68–0.77), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68–0.80), and 7.85 (95% CI, 5.78–10.66), respectively. Criteria for positive mesorectal lymph node metastasis included (A) a short-axis diameter of 5 mm, (B) morphological standard, including an irregular border and mixed-signal intensity within the lymph node, (C) a short-axis diameter of 5 mm with the morphological standard, (D) a short-axis diameter of 8 mm with the morphological standard, and (E) a short-axis diameter of 10 mm with the morphological standard. The pooled sensitivity/specificity for these criteria were 75%/64%, 81%/67%, 74%/79%, 72%/66%, and 62%/91%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the criteria in sensitivity/specificity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values of the fitted summary ROC indicated a diagnostic accuracy rate of 0.75–0.81.ConclusionMRI scans have minimal accuracy as a reference index for pretreatment staging of various lymph node staging criteria in rectal cancer. Multiple types of evidence should be used in clinical decision-making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document